below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby rayiner » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:29 pm

mac.empress wrote:You are bitter...and often rejected.


Not bitter, just shallow. Mismatched couples offend my aesthetic sensibilities.

User avatar
mac.empress
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mac.empress » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:31 pm

rayiner wrote:
mac.empress wrote:You are bitter...and often rejected.


Not bitter, just shallow. Mismatched couples offend my aesthetic sensibilities.


Aha. I that case, we may be on the same page then. Ish.

User avatar
OperaSoprano
Posts: 4410
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby OperaSoprano » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:32 pm

rayiner wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:Are you saying I'm dumb, or just atypical of girls in general? Do you think this is a reasonable approach to boy evaluation?


It's just my tongue-in-cheek way of saying that your approach to boy evaluation is :roll: .


Okay, Ray. You're gifted at just about everything else. You tell me who I should be falling for.

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby rayiner » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:33 pm

OperaSoprano wrote:
rayiner wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:Are you saying I'm dumb, or just atypical of girls in general? Do you think this is a reasonable approach to boy evaluation?


It's just my tongue-in-cheek way of saying that your approach to boy evaluation is :roll: .


Okay, Ray. You're gifted at just about everything else. You tell me who I should be falling for.


7+.

User avatar
nyyankees
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:50 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby nyyankees » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:34 pm

mac.empress wrote:
Ragged wrote:
mac.empress wrote:
Certified, baby. No pix though so stfu. :)


You are a 4, unless you can provide a picture of yourself in front of your computer with TLS open on your screen so we know its you.


For all I care you could call me .5. No pix for you.

Back to OPs depressing problems...



love the response. If you are hot enough to consider yourself an 8, humble enough not to give yourself a 10 on the internet (though you probably think you deserve it) and smart enough not to give a shit, you my friend must be hot.

User avatar
nyyankees
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:50 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby nyyankees » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:35 pm

kittenmittons wrote:Dr Dre has some advice for you bro: Track 16 on the Chronic.


all kinds of win going on here.

User avatar
nyyankees
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:50 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby nyyankees » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:36 pm

mrmediocre wrote:
Modian wrote:did you explain your upward trend?

she is the boalt hall of women

read into that analogy


Ken has been there?

User avatar
OperaSoprano
Posts: 4410
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby OperaSoprano » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:39 pm

rayiner wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:
rayiner wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:Are you saying I'm dumb, or just atypical of girls in general? Do you think this is a reasonable approach to boy evaluation?


It's just my tongue-in-cheek way of saying that your approach to boy evaluation is :roll: .


Okay, Ray. You're gifted at just about everything else. You tell me who I should be falling for.


7+.


Does this apply solely to physical appearance, or to all attributes?

(The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.)

Also, does this mean I am in the 7 range?

User avatar
mac.empress
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mac.empress » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:45 pm

OperaSoprano wrote:Does this apply solely to physical appearance, or to all attributes?

(The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.)

Also, does this mean I am in the 7 range?


This.

User avatar
mac.empress
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mac.empress » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:46 pm

nyyankees wrote:
mac.empress wrote:
Ragged wrote:
mac.empress wrote:
Certified, baby. No pix though so stfu. :)


You are a 4, unless you can provide a picture of yourself in front of your computer with TLS open on your screen so we know its you.


For all I care you could call me .5. No pix for you.

Back to OPs depressing problems...



love the response. If you are hot enough to consider yourself an 8, humble enough not to give yourself a 10 on the internet (though you probably think you deserve it) and smart enough not to give a shit, you my friend must be hot.


:oops: ...... :mrgreen:

mrmediocre
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mrmediocre » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:48 pm

questions?

User avatar
D. H2Oman
Posts: 7469
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby D. H2Oman » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:48 pm

Don't worry OP that girl was probably just yield protecting you.

User avatar
mac.empress
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mac.empress » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:51 pm

OP, plan B for chick and grades?

User avatar
D. H2Oman
Posts: 7469
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby D. H2Oman » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:52 pm

mac.empress wrote:OP, plan B for chick and grades?



Just study more and ask out every halfway decent looking girl that you see.

mrmediocre
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mrmediocre » Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:53 pm

mac.empress wrote:OP, plan B for chick and grades?

none, work harder on the course material

User avatar
sapp
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby sapp » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:00 pm

What about expanding your target region?

Maybe you're limiting yourself by only trying for a Big Law position in your immediate area.
You may be qualified for an even better position outside the vicinity you're currently applying to.

User avatar
20160810
Posts: 19648
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby 20160810 » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:09 pm

mac.empress wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:Does this apply solely to physical appearance, or to all attributes?

(The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.)

Also, does this mean I am in the 7 range?


This.

It's also much harder to 10-scale a guy, because guys can do much more to enhance their physical appearance through the use of exercise. Let's take the example of a guy who is basically a 5: No major physical deformities and not a ginger, but really nothing special going on. All of a sudden, this guy starts hitting the gym all the time, gets biceps and abs. His 10-scale rating just went way up without any appreciable change to his otherwise-average face.

Girls, on the other hand, are far less lucky in this regard. They are generally expected to be in-shape, but excessive exercise doesn't raise their rating at all and might even lower it (a girl with bigger guns/nicer abs than me would freak me out--just don't be overweight). Although other factors (boobs mainly, exceptions made for a truly shapely ass) do play in, girls are more or less forced to play the hand they were dealt facially.

Thus, there is the potential that you might fall for a guy who is in the 4-6 range, knowing that with the right investment of time and effort he has the potential to put himself into the 6-8.5/9 range. Conversely, if a guy is rated highly because of his body, you need to use caution: Don't let him start skipping workouts and eating fast food just because he's getting laid regularly, or your 8.5 bf might be a 6 before you know it.

User avatar
sapp
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby sapp » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:13 pm

SoftBoiledLife wrote:
mac.empress wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:Does this apply solely to physical appearance, or to all attributes?

(The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.)
Also, does this mean I am in the 7 range?


This.

It's also much harder to 10-scale a guy, because guys can do much more to enhance their physical appearance through the use of exercise. Let's take the example of a guy who is basically a 5: No major physical deformities and not a ginger, but really nothing special going on. All of a sudden, this guy starts hitting the gym all the time, gets biceps and abs. His 10-scale rating just went way up without any appreciable change to his otherwise-average face.

Girls, on the other hand, are far less lucky in this regard. They are generally expected to be in-shape, but excessive exercise doesn't raise their rating at all and might even lower it (a girl with bigger guns/nicer abs than me would freak me out--just don't be overweight). Although other factors (boobs mainly, exceptions made for a truly shapely ass) do play in, girls are more or less forced to play the hand they were dealt facially.

Thus, there is the potential that you might fall for a guy who is in the 4-6 range, knowing that with the right investment of time and effort he has the potential to put himself into the 6-8.5/9 range. Conversely, if a guy is rated highly because of his body, you need to use caution: Don't let him start skipping workouts and eating fast food just because he's getting laid regularly, or your 8.5 bf might be a 6 before you know it.


/Begins to reconsider using the gym as a distraction from status checkers.

You speak an ugly truth sir.
Last edited by sapp on Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mac.empress
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby mac.empress » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:14 pm

SoftBoiledLife wrote:
mac.empress wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:Does this apply solely to physical appearance, or to all attributes?

(The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.)

Also, does this mean I am in the 7 range?


This.

It's also much harder to 10-scale a guy, because guys can do much more to enhance their physical appearance through the use of exercise. Let's take the example of a guy who is basically a 5: No major physical deformities and not a ginger, but really nothing special going on. All of a sudden, this guy starts hitting the gym all the time, gets biceps and abs. His 10-scale rating just went way up without any appreciable change to his otherwise-average face.

Girls, on the other hand, are far less lucky in this regard. They are generally expected to be in-shape, but excessive exercise doesn't raise their rating at all and might even lower it (a girl with bigger guns/nicer abs than me would freak me out--just don't be overweight). Although other factors (boobs mainly, exceptions made for a truly shapely ass) do play in, girls are more or less forced to play the hand they were dealt facially.

Thus, there is the potential that you might fall for a guy who is in the 4-6 range, knowing that with the right investment of time and effort he has the potential to put himself into the 6-8.5/9 range. Conversely, if a guy is rated highly because of his body, you need to use caution: Don't let him start skipping workouts and eating fast food just because he's getting laid regularly, or your 8.5 bf might be a 6 before you know it.


LOL!

User avatar
TheLuckyOne
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:00 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby TheLuckyOne » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:41 pm

OperaSoprano wrote:The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.



This reminds me of when the "10" overly confident guy asked me out and I refused without providing any good reason besides the fact that I was not in a mood. It took him ~20 minutes to clarify if I remembered who I was speaking with and how exactly he looked like. I mean he asked these questions at least 10 times. :lol: That was hilarious.
Last edited by TheLuckyOne on Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
D. H2Oman
Posts: 7469
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby D. H2Oman » Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:42 pm

So much Anti-hopefulundergrad trolling in here

wocehtoom
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:16 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby wocehtoom » Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:00 pm

A/S/L?

....oh shit wrong forum

deathviaboredom
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:21 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby deathviaboredom » Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:15 pm

rayiner wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:
mac.empress wrote:
SoftBoiledLife wrote:
Rayiner, I don't get to say this much to you, but the fundamental premise of your analysis here is flawed: You are neglecting the possibility that overreaching itself can often (within a certain boundary range) provide the requisite qualification. Sure, typically a 5 hitting on an 8 will be shot down, yes, but there exist a not insignificant amount of instances wherein the boldness required for a 5 to hit on an 8 will convey to that 8 that the 5-male possesses some quality enabling him to be in her league (usually the female will assume that this is some kind of intangible, such as money, coolness, intellect, etc.).

It it precisely because most people view overreaching as a suicide mission that it is so often successful (at least for men--women have a much harder time overreaching because men are inherently far more superficial and care less about intangibles). Women are apt to assume that overreaching is just not done, and therefore the guy is in their league. By the time they figure out the truth, it's often too late and an emotional attachment has formed.


From a chick, TITCR.


This. I don't know what number I get, but what I fall for generally (nerdiness/intellectual fireworks, vulnerability [cockiness = gigantic turnoff], and some "feeling" qualities) is not readily physically apparent. If someone has all that, his attractiveness number is just not going to matter.


Girls are dumb.


TITCR

User avatar
20160810
Posts: 19648
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby 20160810 » Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:45 pm

TheLuckyOne wrote:
OperaSoprano wrote:The problem is that attractive boys know they are attractive, and that is unattractive.



This reminds me of when the "10" overly confident guy asked me out and I refused without providing any good reason besides the fact that I was not in a mood. It took him ~20 minutes to clarify if I remembered who I was speaking with and how exactly he looked like. I mean he asked these questions at least 10 times. :lol: That was hilarious.


I think what we're supposed to get from this post is that

A.) Enough incredibly attractive males pay you romantic attention that rejecting one requires no hesitation whatsoever.
B.) You are, accordingly, very attractive yourself.

Neither A nor B can be given any credence whatsoever until you provide pics

(Source: Restatement 2d of Internet:

§42 All internet forum posters are presumed male until proven otherwise

§42(a) If content of posting indicates that poster is female, it is valid to presume that this is factual, although such evidence is by no means to be treated as conclusive.

§42(a)(1) All internet females should be presumed supremely unattractive until pics are provided.

§42(a)(1)(A) All pics should be presumed to have been taken at a tricky "Myspace-style" angle to disguise obesity until scaled, full-body pics are provided.)

User avatar
D. H2Oman
Posts: 7469
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am

Re: below median, rejected by hot girl, taking q's

Postby D. H2Oman » Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:59 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: checkers, LawHammer and 14 guests