Re: Chicago Class of 2014
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:04 pm
finally clicked that.Sentry wrote:Still no admit packet....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5BMQ-xpTog
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=141661
finally clicked that.Sentry wrote:Still no admit packet....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5BMQ-xpTog
Good god you're persuasive. That is pretty awesome.
Bastards!eskimo wrote:
Dammit Forza! She's ours!forza wrote:Bastards!eskimo wrote:
Also - when you come in March I'll introduce you to some 1Ls/popular hang-out spots in the Village. Try to make your decision a little tougher.
Low blow, man. Low blow.Sentry wrote:This thread is for T5ers only.
I'm pretty sure Forza's success at Law School is going to make all of us "T5ers" extremely jealous, so I would go easy on that kind of talk!Sentry wrote:This thread is for T5ers only.
Details!er doctor wrote:Got my admit packet in the mail today.
A hard copy of the viewbook that can be downloaded on the admitted students websiteeskimo wrote:Details!er doctor wrote:Got my admit packet in the mail today.
Regents caps heating bills at around $70 I believe.Kili wrote:+1, Heat is included. Someone from a past thread said heat ran them $400+ in winter and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Regents includes it.Muenchen wrote:Looking again at some of the photos and set ups at Algonquin, I'm starting to like it more and more. The way that the photos showed the studio divided up made it look neat. I think that and the reported clunkiness of the university housing process is making private the more appealing option.
I'm not sure what you mean by sufficient. What would make it insufficient?Kili wrote:Any idea whether that's sufficient for the worst months?California Babe wrote:Regents caps heating bills at around $70 I believe.Kili wrote:+1, Heat is included. Someone from a past thread said heat ran them $400+ in winter and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Regents includes it.Muenchen wrote:Looking again at some of the photos and set ups at Algonquin, I'm starting to like it more and more. The way that the photos showed the studio divided up made it look neat. I think that and the reported clunkiness of the university housing process is making private the more appealing option.
Don't worry. The Law School will subsidize your drinking most Friday afternoons if you find yourself unable to afford it otherwise.Muenchen wrote:As a St. Louis native, someone who enjoys alcohol, and someone who hates taxes, I found this graphic in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch a little depressing. Probably won't change my mind though
--LinkRemoved--
Lulz. Awesome. It would only marginally affect my consumption. Also maybe spur me to load up when I'm at home!California Babe wrote:Don't worry. The Law School will subsidize your drinking most Friday afternoons if you find yourself unable to afford it otherwise.Muenchen wrote:As a St. Louis native, someone who enjoys alcohol, and someone who hates taxes, I found this graphic in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch a little depressing. Probably won't change my mind though
--LinkRemoved--
I think I see the miscommunication. Cali is just telling us not to worry about outrageous heating bills at Regents because no matter how much heat you use, the most you will have to pay is $70. I think Kili was thinking that they only allow you to use $70 worth of heat and was worried that more would be necessary in the cold winters. But it's good to know that we won't have to freeze if we go with Regents! Correct me if I am misunderstanding what you both meant.California Babe wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by sufficient. What would make it insufficient?Kili wrote:Any idea whether that's sufficient for the worst months?California Babe wrote:Regents caps heating bills at around $70 I believe.Kili wrote: +1, Heat is included. Someone from a past thread said heat ran them $400+ in winter and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Regents includes it.
Ah yes, that makes sense. So to clarify: Regents caps how much you have to pay at ~$70, not how much heat you are allowed to use.Muenchen wrote:I think I see the miscommunication. Cali is just telling us not to worry about outrageous heating bills at Regents because no matter how much heat you use, the most you will have to pay is $70. I think Kili was thinking that they only allow you to use $70 worth of heat and was worried that more would be necessary in the cold winters. But it's good to know that we won't have to freeze if we go with Regents! Correct me if I am misunderstanding what you both meant.