Biglaw lawyer taking questions

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
ToTransferOrNot
Posts: 1928
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby ToTransferOrNot » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:44 am

Do you know any people in the bankruptcy group at your firm? If so, does it seem like things are slowing down, and what do the exit options seem to be for bankruptcy folks?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273137
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:51 am

ToTransferOrNot wrote:Do you know any people in the bankruptcy group at your firm? If so, does it seem like things are slowing down, and what do the exit options seem to be for bankruptcy folks?


I can answer about my firm: BK is always busy. It was absolutely crazy last year and the year before. Things have definitely slowed down, but it's still very, very busy.

It doesn't take a law firm insider to know this either. Just look at the number of bankruptcy filings last year and their asset values and compare them to the year before.

User avatar
rocon7383
Posts: 431
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:02 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby rocon7383 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:46 am

0LNewbie wrote:How obnoxious is tracking your activity in 6 minute increments? That's one of the things about biglaw that is most off-putting to me. I probably need to get over it.



Could you explain what this means? I'm oblivious.

User avatar
homestyle28
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:48 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby homestyle28 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:52 am

Not to be overly simple, but are you happy?

User avatar
jchoggan
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:26 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby jchoggan » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:53 am

rocon7383 wrote:
0LNewbie wrote:How obnoxious is tracking your activity in 6 minute increments? That's one of the things about biglaw that is most off-putting to me. I probably need to get over it.



Could you explain what this means? I'm oblivious.

You track billable hours in 6-minute increments... it's how your firm gets paid (typically), and one of the primary ways you get evaluated. From what I understand, it is rather obnoxious, but you get used to it pretty quickly... just part of the grind.

Stanislaw Carter
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby Stanislaw Carter » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:55 am

You track billable hours in 6-minute increments... it's how your firm gets paid (typically), and how you get evaluated. From what I understand, it is rather obnoxious, but you get used to it pretty quickly... just part of the grind.


Not every firm does those increments.

User avatar
rocon7383
Posts: 431
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:02 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby rocon7383 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:55 am

homestyle28 wrote:Not to be overly simple, but are you happy?


+1, but building off of it, would you say working in biglaw has had an overall negative or positive impact on your social life/friendships/relationships? Obviously, I don't expect you to get into specifics but appreciate any insight you may offer.

User avatar
japes
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:24 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby japes » Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:55 am

Would longish hair on a guy be a negative in an interview? Assume it's around shoulder-length and well-groomed, and cutting it could have a negative impact on confidence in the interview.

User avatar
homestyle28
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:48 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby homestyle28 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:58 am

japes wrote:Would longish hair on a guy be a negative in an interview? Assume it's around shoulder-length and well-groomed, and cutting it could have a negative impact on confidence in the interview.


Samson, esq.?

User avatar
nixxers
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:47 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby nixxers » Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:39 pm

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but how do 1L's apply for summer positions with your firm? i.e. is the information your firm's website or...?


thanks so much for taking the time to do this, I've been following it since the beginning and it's been very helpful.

User avatar
japes
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:24 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby japes » Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:44 pm

homestyle28 wrote:
japes wrote:Would longish hair on a guy be a negative in an interview? Assume it's around shoulder-length and well-groomed, and cutting it could have a negative impact on confidence in the interview.


Samson, esq.?


I've had it that way since probably middle school and am very uncomfortable with the idea of cutting it short for a variety of personal reasons. I'm wondering if I can get by with cutting my hair for interviews or if I should just get used to it being short.

bmontminy
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:06 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby bmontminy » Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:47 pm

In your experience, if a 1L has average grades first semester, but killer grades the second semester, will firms note this difference to an extent it may make a difference? Or is it strictly looking at the overall GPA?

User avatar
clintonius
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby clintonius » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:25 pm

Stanislaw Carter wrote:
You track billable hours in 6-minute increments... it's how your firm gets paid (typically), and how you get evaluated. From what I understand, it is rather obnoxious, but you get used to it pretty quickly... just part of the grind.


Not every firm does those increments.

It's often up to the client you're doing the work for. The firm I was at (as an admin) set its default to 15-minute increments, but if the client requires 6-minute increments you have to switch to that.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273137
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:30 pm

Do you find that there is any age discrimination? In other words, when your firm is looking to hire new attorneys, is there an implicit preference for those in their mid 20s as opposed to those in their late 20s or older?

Thank you.

User avatar
vamedic03
Posts: 1579
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby vamedic03 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Do you find that there is any age discrimination? In other words, when your firm is looking to hire new attorneys, is there an implicit preference for those in their mid 20s as opposed to those in their late 20s or older?

Thank you.


As a 30 y.o. 2L, I can tell you that I certainly never faced any 'age discrimination' and, in general, had more success than my peers without work experience.

And, there's no reason a rational employer, if looking at 2 otherwise equally qualified candidates would choose the candidate without work experience just so the are younger.

Stanislaw Carter
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby Stanislaw Carter » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:36 pm

clintonius wrote:
Stanislaw Carter wrote:
You track billable hours in 6-minute increments... it's how your firm gets paid (typically), and how you get evaluated. From what I understand, it is rather obnoxious, but you get used to it pretty quickly... just part of the grind.


Not every firm does those increments.

It's often up to the client you're doing the work for. The firm I was at (as an admin) set its default to 15-minute increments, but if the client requires 6-minute increments you have to switch to that.


Again, it just depends on the firm. Some firms just have the clout to insist that they bill in 15-minute increments, whether clients like it or not.

Some practices, however, are prone to having finer increments.

User avatar
Kohinoor
Posts: 2756
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby Kohinoor » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:57 pm

clintonius wrote:
Stanislaw Carter wrote:
You track billable hours in 6-minute increments... it's how your firm gets paid (typically), and how you get evaluated. From what I understand, it is rather obnoxious, but you get used to it pretty quickly... just part of the grind.


Not every firm does those increments.

It's often up to the client you're doing the work for. The firm I was at (as an admin) set its default to 15-minute increments, but if the client requires 6-minute increments you have to switch to that.

Bankruptcy had rules requiring 6 minute increments. Most of our other departments went by 10s.

::edit::

SDNY specific. YMMV.
Last edited by Kohinoor on Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
TatteredDignity
Posts: 1520
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby TatteredDignity » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:00 pm

So, if you work on the same thing for a couple of hours, it's not too much of a pain to enter the activity into whatever system right? Or does it suck no matter what.

User avatar
Kohinoor
Posts: 2756
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby Kohinoor » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:06 pm

0LNewbie wrote:So, if you work on the same thing for a couple of hours, it's not too much of a pain to enter the activity into whatever system right? Or does it suck no matter what.

As a practical matter, partners will pester you not to have a particularly long time block with one entry. So if you spent 12 hours marking up a merger agreement, you might get flak for "Reviewed Merger Agreement (12.00)". It usually goes down better if you have a few entries with detailed descriptions or at least many little entries.

3rdYrLitigator
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby 3rdYrLitigator » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:51 pm

JusticeJackson wrote:Would your firm hire a person that went to a terrible school, but did a Fed COA clerkship? If so, would you guys interview clerks that didn't summer there in the Fall?


Most likely and yes.

3rdYrLitigator
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby 3rdYrLitigator » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:52 pm

0LNewbie wrote:How obnoxious is tracking your activity in 6 minute increments? That's one of the things about biglaw that is most off-putting to me. I probably need to get over it.


It's generally a pain in the ass.

3rdYrLitigator
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby 3rdYrLitigator » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:53 pm

glitched wrote:Hello. Just wanted to start by saying thanks because this is great.

I think questions about work experience were asked before, but I wanted to ask how bad it looks if during my year off, I worked somewhere for about 5 months after graduation, quit, and then had a big time gap until law school started? Well I quit my job about a month and a half ago for personal reasons and I can't find a job and it looks like I might have to be unemployed until August.


I don't think it's a big deal, just be prepared to answer what you were doing.

3rdYrLitigator
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby 3rdYrLitigator » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:53 pm

soccerfreak wrote:How far down the "rankings" does your firm go for OCI?


OCI lists are available through NALP, I don't want to give out exact school rankings, but not that far.

3rdYrLitigator
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby 3rdYrLitigator » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:54 pm

ToTransferOrNot wrote:Do you know any people in the bankruptcy group at your firm? If so, does it seem like things are slowing down, and what do the exit options seem to be for bankruptcy folks?


Sorry, don't really have much interaction with them, I think they're generally busy, but have no idea about exit options.

3rdYrLitigator
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: Biglaw lawyer taking questions

Postby 3rdYrLitigator » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:55 pm

homestyle28 wrote:Not to be overly simple, but are you happy?


Overall, I'd say I'm content. But there are times that I really hate Biglaw life.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.