Military Law Forum

(Issue areas, International Law, International Public Interest, Public Service in the private sector, Non-Profits, Public Interest Organizations, Government/ government agencies, employment settings)
Fed_Atty

Bronze
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:01 am

Re: Military Law

Post by Fed_Atty » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:22 pm

andythefir wrote:Especially for 1st time applicants don't get your hopes up because the Navy never takes anyone on their 1st board. Ever. It's a numbers game, there are enough applicants that they can afford to only choose the people who are willing to risk their whole careers for a chance. All branches (except for the OYCP) will insist on turning down applicants multiple times before they accept them to prove that they want it bad enough, there are enough of us that they can do whatever they want.
Incorrect. The Navy does take people on their first board. They took me on my first board and I know of others.

andythefir

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Military Law

Post by andythefir » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:23 pm

NavyJAG1 wrote:
andythefir wrote:Especially for 1st time applicants don't get your hopes up because the Navy never takes anyone on their 1st board. Ever. It's a numbers game, there are enough applicants that they can afford to only choose the people who are willing to risk their whole careers for a chance. All branches (except for the OYCP) will insist on turning down applicants multiple times before they accept them to prove that they want it bad enough, there are enough of us that they can do whatever they want.
Incorrect. The Navy does take people on their first board. They took me on my first board and I know of others.
Congratulations, but when did you apply? Did you have former military service/some other game-changer? The Navy told me straight up that for people without those kinds of backgrounds applying in 2013 for the first time is very grim.

User avatar
bouakedojo

Bronze
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by bouakedojo » Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:19 pm

andythefir wrote:
NavyJAG1 wrote:
andythefir wrote:Especially for 1st time applicants don't get your hopes up because the Navy never takes anyone on their 1st board. Ever. It's a numbers game, there are enough applicants that they can afford to only choose the people who are willing to risk their whole careers for a chance. All branches (except for the OYCP) will insist on turning down applicants multiple times before they accept them to prove that they want it bad enough, there are enough of us that they can do whatever they want.
Incorrect. The Navy does take people on their first board. They took me on my first board and I know of others.
Congratulations, but when did you apply? Did you have former military service/some other game-changer? The Navy told me straight up that for people without those kinds of backgrounds applying in 2013 for the first time is very grim.
I believe he's a former Navy officer, IIRC.

adonai

Silver
Posts: 1033
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:09 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by adonai » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:18 pm

bouakedojo wrote:
andythefir wrote:
NavyJAG1 wrote:
andythefir wrote:Especially for 1st time applicants don't get your hopes up because the Navy never takes anyone on their 1st board. Ever. It's a numbers game, there are enough applicants that they can afford to only choose the people who are willing to risk their whole careers for a chance. All branches (except for the OYCP) will insist on turning down applicants multiple times before they accept them to prove that they want it bad enough, there are enough of us that they can do whatever they want.
Incorrect. The Navy does take people on their first board. They took me on my first board and I know of others.
Congratulations, but when did you apply? Did you have former military service/some other game-changer? The Navy told me straight up that for people without those kinds of backgrounds applying in 2013 for the first time is very grim.
I believe he's a former Navy officer, IIRC.
My interviewer did the Navy JAG internship and got in on first try. Perhaps former Navy/military experience is a huge bump. There's enough of those types to take so I am not expecting at all to be taken in this time. Not just saying that as a figure of speech but am actually deciding my next steps as if I already got rejected.

andythefir

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Military Law

Post by andythefir » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:24 pm

adonai wrote: Not just saying that as a figure of speech but am actually deciding my next steps as if I already got rejected.
In 2013 every JAG applicant at every level should always assume they will get rejected. The numbers are way too low to count on the JAG at any point.
Last edited by andythefir on Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


NAOBERJU

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:30 am

Re: Military Law

Post by NAOBERJU » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:46 am

Just to chime in...I was accepted by the Navy on my first board and I have no prior military experience or family connection. I would not throw away or discount the first board. Anything is possible.

adonai

Silver
Posts: 1033
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:09 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by adonai » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:14 am

NAOBERJU wrote:Just to chime in...I was accepted by the Navy on my first board and I have no prior military experience or family connection. I would not throw away or discount the first board. Anything is possible.
Let me guess, top 10%? :P

User avatar
Esquire

Bronze
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:45 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by Esquire » Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:53 pm

andythefir wrote:Especially for 1st time applicants don't get your hopes up because the Navy never takes anyone on their 1st board. Ever. It's a numbers game, there are enough applicants that they can afford to only choose the people who are willing to risk their whole careers for a chance. All branches (except for the OYCP) will insist on turning down applicants multiple times before they accept them to prove that they want it bad enough, there are enough of us that they can do whatever they want.
Completely untrue on the Navy account and the "all branches" comment.

User avatar
abogadesq

Silver
Posts: 589
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 1:30 am

Re: Military Law

Post by abogadesq » Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:47 pm

Esquire wrote:For those who were selected for Army AD and are just finishing up law school, hurry up and get another job. February 2014 is the earliest you'll be starting, most likely.
I thought the Army only selects people after they take the bar exam?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


DannyBoy31

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:38 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by DannyBoy31 » Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:52 pm

OYCP applicant here anxiously awaiting the board results. Maybe we'll get lucky and they'll be released this week, although the recent trend suggests it will be the last week of February or the first week of March.

Can anyone who has been accepted to this program please give a brief summary of what to expect if accepted as far as when you meet with the AFROTC detachment, when one should expect to go to MEPS, take the AFOQT, and attend summer training? Thanks!

User avatar
Pumpkin_Pie

New
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:37 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by Pumpkin_Pie » Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:05 pm

Tagging

target

Silver
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:40 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by target » Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:53 pm

DannyBoy31 wrote:OYCP applicant here anxiously awaiting the board results. Maybe we'll get lucky and they'll be released this week, although the recent trend suggests it will be the last week of February or the first week of March.

Can anyone who has been accepted to this program please give a brief summary of what to expect if accepted as far as when you meet with the AFROTC detachment, when one should expect to go to MEPS, take the AFOQT, and attend summer training? Thanks!
I am applying for this board review, but here is what my ROTC interviewer told me. He said that I need to contact him/ROTC detachment as soon as I find out the result to get all the paperwork done. I will then go through a background check, a medical examination, etc. He also mentioned that the summer training will start around mid- to late-June and run until late-July.

Good luck!

NAOBERJU

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:30 am

Re: Military Law

Post by NAOBERJU » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:59 pm

I have good grades but I was not in the top 10%. I am not even close to the top 10%. I also did not go to a tier one law school. While the Navy seemed to care about grades, they definitely were looking at other factors. My impression, and this is just my personal opinion, but I think the interview and the Navy JAG Corps internship were the two most significant parts of my application.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


navyjagjds

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by navyjagjds » Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:40 pm

I was also selected for Navy JAG on my first attempt and I do not have any military or family connections. My grades were in the top half of the class at a first tier law school. I will second Naoberju in that the interview seemed to be a very important factor. I also had extensive leadership in undergrad and a couple of prestigious leadership awards.

andythefir

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Military Law

Post by andythefir » Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:51 pm

navyjagjds wrote:I was also selected for Navy JAG on my first attempt and I do not have any military or family connections. My grades were in the top half of the class at a first tier law school. I will second Naoberju in that the interview seemed to be a very important factor. I also had extensive leadership in undergrad and a couple of prestigious leadership awards.
Looks like the recruiters were trying to let me down easy then.

erik_1717

New
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:54 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by erik_1717 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Any Army 2L summer interns hear back regarding the final selections?

navyjagjds

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by navyjagjds » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:48 pm

andythefir wrote:
navyjagjds wrote:I was also selected for Navy JAG on my first attempt and I do not have any military or family connections. My grades were in the top half of the class at a first tier law school. I will second Naoberju in that the interview seemed to be a very important factor. I also had extensive leadership in undergrad and a couple of prestigious leadership awards.
Looks like the recruiters were trying to let me down easy then.
Well, I was also pretty convinced that one needed a military connection of some sort and that it would take a few boards to show them that I was serious about joining. Maybe the decision-makers mixed it up this year and the recruiters normally would be right about what they told you.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


f_atc

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:50 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by f_atc » Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:56 pm

I applied for the AF GLP for the Feb 2013 board. Are there many people on here waiting on those results?

Wondering who else is checking this blog, the AF Facebook page, and their phones over and over again everyday.

User avatar
bouakedojo

Bronze
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:08 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by bouakedojo » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:41 pm

andythefir wrote:
navyjagjds wrote:I was also selected for Navy JAG on my first attempt and I do not have any military or family connections. My grades were in the top half of the class at a first tier law school. I will second Naoberju in that the interview seemed to be a very important factor. I also had extensive leadership in undergrad and a couple of prestigious leadership awards.
Looks like the recruiters were trying to let me down easy then.
No, I think the general rule is that most don't get selected on the first board. The people posting here that have are the exceptions to the rule. I've talked to four different Navy JAGs who've said the same thing to me. One said they did a survey at their JAG training of how many people there got in the first time and almost everyone said it took multiple attempts.

All that said, keep your head up. :)

DannyBoy31

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:38 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by DannyBoy31 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:54 pm

f_atc wrote:I applied for the AF GLP for the Feb 2013 board. Are there many people on here waiting on those results?

Wondering who else is checking this blog, the AF Facebook page, and their phones over and over again everyday.

I'd say it's safe to say you're in good company. I applied to the OYCP, but I think the same board makes selections for both programs.

zashby

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:43 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by zashby » Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:11 pm

DannyBoy31 wrote:
f_atc wrote:I applied for the AF GLP for the Feb 2013 board. Are there many people on here waiting on those results?

Wondering who else is checking this blog, the AF Facebook page, and their phones over and over again everyday.

I'd say it's safe to say you're in good company. I applied to the OYCP, but I think the same board makes selections for both programs.
I am also applying. Does anyone know if there is a quota for how many 1Ls, 2Ls, etc. they are looking for or if the AF just wants to fill x number of spots and doesn't care how its allocated?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Trout et al

Bronze
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:36 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by Trout et al » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:09 pm

.
Last edited by Trout et al on Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Pdk7

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:45 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by Pdk7 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:43 pm

Trout et al wrote:Does school prestige matter for JAG? If so, to what extent? What advice would you give someone who is deciding between lower Top-14 at sticker and regional tier-1 with close to full ride? Is JAG basically too selective to even take into consideration when making this decision.

Assume no military experience or connections.
I would say it doesn't matter for the most part. I don't know anything about the other branches but I know that its not really a priority for Army. They care more about the quality of the person. I used to be kind of paranoid about this as well, and I kind of didn't trust other people when they told me the same thing, but do your own research. I went to their website and looked at the list of individuals selected for Active Duty, Reserves, and 1L and 2L internships. You'll see that the list of schools includes almost as many T4 schools as it does T1 on all of them. I did this for each year of law school and as I was applying, and it never really changed. I'm graduating from a Tier 4 school and I got 2L summer internship and the AD position.

target

Silver
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:40 pm

Re: Military Law

Post by target » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:16 pm

Pdk7 wrote:
Trout et al wrote:Does school prestige matter for JAG? If so, to what extent? What advice would you give someone who is deciding between lower Top-14 at sticker and regional tier-1 with close to full ride? Is JAG basically too selective to even take into consideration when making this decision.

Assume no military experience or connections.
I would say it doesn't matter for the most part. I don't know anything about the other branches but I know that its not really a priority for Army. They care more about the quality of the person. I used to be kind of paranoid about this as well, and I kind of didn't trust other people when they told me the same thing, but do your own research. I went to their website and looked at the list of individuals selected for Active Duty, Reserves, and 1L and 2L internships. You'll see that the list of schools includes almost as many T4 schools as it does T1 on all of them. I did this for each year of law school and as I was applying, and it never really changed. I'm graduating from a Tier 4 school and I got 2L summer internship and the AD position.
With this said, go to a school that you think would give you most job prospects. Don't put all your eggs in the JAG basket.

User avatar
howell

Silver
Posts: 615
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:57 am

Re: Military Law

Post by howell » Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:46 am

Trout et al wrote:Does school prestige matter for JAG? If so, to what extent? What advice would you give someone who is deciding between lower Top-14 at sticker and regional tier-1 with close to full ride? Is JAG basically too selective to even take into consideration when making this decision.

Assume no military experience or connections.
I have not seen any indication in the Air Force's selections that school matters at all. In our 60+ person JASOC class, very few are from T14s. I would say most are from solid T1 & T2 schools, but they run the gamut. And this class was all selected during the past year or so, which was certainly a very selective time for the AF. No one that I've talked to who has been involved in the selection process seems concerned with the school. My guess would be that it's tougher finding law students who can handle the legal work who can also be good officers.

I also agree with the poster above who said not to put all of your eggs in the JAG basket. You never know when something might come up that could disqualify you. I think you'll be ahead of the game if you go to law school knowing you want to apply for JAG positions, but, as with anyone applying for JAG, you have to have a plan B. What that is might be better served by less debt or a higher-ranked school.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Public Interest & Government”