Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 338989
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 11, 2019 1:12 am

Finally narrowed down my options to 2 firms S&C in New York and Sidley in Chicago, liked both firms equally, interested in transactional work (investment funds, finance..., but not really M&A).

Currently leaning toward Sidley. I like New York a lot but Chicago seems more amenable to establishing roots and settling down, plus it's more affordable.

Everyone around me, however, keeps telling me that I should take S&C, which is making me doubt myself. I understand that New York offers more/better deals/greater variety in terms of corporate work but is there something so magical about corporate in New York that I'd be doing myself a disservice by starting in Chicago?

Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks.

User avatar
trebekismyhero

Silver
Posts: 834
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby trebekismyhero » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:59 am

If you think you would be happier in Chicago go with Sidley. They have a good investment funds group. I chose Chicago over NY and don't regret it at all

User avatar
yodamiked

Bronze
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby yodamiked » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:13 am

If Chicago is where you want to end up in the long run, then definitely start in Chicago. Starting at a big firm in NY definitely opens up doors for you if you're unclear where you want to be/what you want to be doing in the future, but coming from someone in NY, I find the benefits you're told as a law student/junior to be somewhat over-exaggerated.

The Lsat Airbender

Bronze
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:34 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby The Lsat Airbender » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:39 am

yodamiked wrote:Starting at a big firm in NY definitely opens up doors for you if you're unclear where you want to be/what you want to be doing in the future, but coming from someone in NY, I find the benefits you're told as a law student/junior to be somewhat over-exaggerated.


Especially when we're talking about the delta between NY and a major market like Chicago. If you're trying to choose between, say, NYC and Louisville, then it might make sense to worry about the kind of generic transactional work you'd get.

Anonymous User
Posts: 338989
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 11, 2019 2:08 pm

trebekismyhero wrote:If you think you would be happier in Chicago go with Sidley. They have a good investment funds group. I chose Chicago over NY and don't regret it at all


Completely agreed. I had a similar choice as OP. I ended, up choosing a top Chicago firm over Cravath, and I don't have a single regret. Chicago is a major market with high quality of work and a very affordable cost of living. Why turn that down for more prefftige when you're already hanging out in the highest echelon of biglaw in your major market?

MillllerTime

New
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:02 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby MillllerTime » Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:55 pm

Sidley, Kirkland, and (to a lesser extent) other major Chicago firms are full of people who either turned down top NY firms or who lateraled here after a few years. I have yet to meet anyone who was unhappy with their decision.

The work is only a very minor step down from the Cravaths and S&Cs, and not a step down at all from lesser NY shops - definitely not enough to make up for the lifestyle. It's mentioned on here plenty, but I can't stress enough how different the NY lifestyle is from the rest of the legal markets out there. If you have comparable options outside of NYC and you don't have a strong desire to live there, don't.

JHP

Bronze
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:11 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby JHP » Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:42 pm

The Lsat Airbender wrote:
yodamiked wrote:Starting at a big firm in NY definitely opens up doors for you if you're unclear where you want to be/what you want to be doing in the future, but coming from someone in NY, I find the benefits you're told as a law student/junior to be somewhat over-exaggerated.


Especially when we're talking about the delta between NY and a major market like Chicago. If you're trying to choose between, say, NYC and Louisville, then it might make sense to worry about the kind of generic transactional work you'd get.

Seconding this and everyone else's comments. If you want to end up in Chicago, start in Chicago. Whatever negligible difference there may be between Sidley and S&C's work will probably be worth it for you to start off in the city you actually want to be in. It's where you'll be cultivating your reputation, your network, personal life, etc., so no use putting in an extra step by going to New York first only to have to uproot yourself to go to Chicago.

Anonymous User
Posts: 338989
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:26 pm

OP here.
Thanks everyone. I appreciate the comments.
I am just curious about what was mentioned regarding the different lifestyle in the NY legal market. What does the NY law firm life entail that would be different in Chicago? I heard the hours in Chicago are fairly similar, especially at places like Sidley.

Res Ipsa Loquitter

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby Res Ipsa Loquitter » Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:45 am

if this was Sidley NY vs. S&C NY, then answer would be S&C.

but it's not worth uprooting your life for a marginal amount of firm prestige. take sidley Chicago if that's where you want to live.

User avatar
trebekismyhero

Silver
Posts: 834
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby trebekismyhero » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:26 pm

Anonymous User wrote:OP here.
Thanks everyone. I appreciate the comments.
I am just curious about what was mentioned regarding the different lifestyle in the NY legal market. What does the NY law firm life entail that would be different in Chicago? I heard the hours in Chicago are fairly similar, especially at places like Sidley.


Generally NY requires a lot more face time. At my Chicago office, corporate associates work in the office between 9:30 and 5 and then usually can do everything else from home, lit associates have it even easier. Whereas I know in our NY office associates are expected to be in the office when working. Late nights working at home are a lot better than in the office. Also, I think most NY firms require first years to share offices. That is not the case in Chicago. Plus the money goes a lot further in Chicago.

RaceJudicata

Gold
Posts: 1771
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby RaceJudicata » Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:27 pm

trebekismyhero wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:OP here.
Thanks everyone. I appreciate the comments.
I am just curious about what was mentioned regarding the different lifestyle in the NY legal market. What does the NY law firm life entail that would be different in Chicago? I heard the hours in Chicago are fairly similar, especially at places like Sidley.


Generally NY requires a lot more face time. At my Chicago office, corporate associates work in the office between 9:30 and 5 and then usually can do everything else from home, lit associates have it even easier. Whereas I know in our NY office associates are expected to be in the office when working. Late nights working at home are a lot better than in the office. Also, I think most NY firms require first years to share offices. That is not the case in Chicago. Plus the money goes a lot further in Chicago.


Yep, number of hours may be the same, but working X hours in the office at 2am is infinitely worse than doing so on your couch. Also, I’ve never understood why NY folks tend to get to the office super late in the morning. Unnecessarily causes you to be in office later at night. But it’s pervasive (at least at my firm)..

Anonymous User
Posts: 338989
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell NY v. Sidley Chicago

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:27 pm

RaceJudicata wrote:
Yep, number of hours may be the same, but working X hours in the office at 2am is infinitely worse than doing so on your couch. Also, I’ve never understood why NY folks tend to get to the office super late in the morning. Unnecessarily causes you to be in office later at night. But it’s pervasive (at least at my firm)..


At my firm, 9:30-10:00 is the regular start time, and I believe official business hours start at 9:30. I always found it bizarre too.



Return to “Legal Employment?

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.