NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
im super jealous of all the people at covington with no hours requirement
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Almost all of the Chicago-based firms, save Kirkland, and including most national firms with offices there (Skadden, Latham) have an hours requirement according to your list.Anonymous User wrote:You and some folks like billable hour requirements? No problem. Keep loving it!Anonymous User wrote:Great job answering the question. Arguing that something is TTT is perhaps the best way to counter a logical question.Anonymous User wrote:There's a reason why most firms don't have that requirement any more. Too TTTAnonymous User wrote: Right? I'm sure most firms without requirements do so because it's next to impossible to not hit 1900 or 2000. Anon(s) that hates billable hours requirements: on average are you below 2k hours at year end?
I wouldn't want it in my life and I am pretty sure many others wouldn't want it. Hence, the trend among major firms has been to move away from that requirement.
https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/associa ... d-bonuses/
Also, if you are in a firm with an assignment pooling system for juniors, juniors don't have much control over their hours. Still, a 1800 hours target definitely isn't particularly difficult to meet, especially if pro bono or marketing hours are included. But those requirements would still be a source of stress when you have absolutely no control over how much work you get.
The associates don't love hours requirements but it's a stretch to say an hours requirement isn't in line with market practice for places like Chicago and Houston.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
id personally rather be at a place that has a bonus threshold, but also pays out above market bonuses as you hit various thresholds. that seems preferable to billing 2800 at S&C to make less than some dickhead at cadwalader billing the same.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
im watching all three world cup games every dayAnonymous User wrote:I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
No spoilers... I'm DVRing them for after work.Anonymous User wrote:im watching all three world cup games every dayAnonymous User wrote:I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
At a firm with no billable requirement, you just don't think about hours at all. You are busy or you are not busy. That's all. Perhaps it's different for Wachtell, but there's no NYC firm that makes you work so much all the time that you literally have no life. There are some months where you absolutely have no life to be sure. But other times, it's not as bad and you do have some free time.Anonymous User wrote:I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I happen to agree with the first anon here because that's what I know. I'm going to be well over my minimum this year, so I have no shame in stepping out early when I can. Even so, sometimes I feel uneasy when others are more buy than me, so it's nice knowing that I'm meeting expectations. If I didn't have the threshold I think I'd be more nervous about what's expected of me (or if my work is being valued), even if it's unspoken.Anonymous User wrote:At a firm with no billable requirement, you just don't think about hours at all. You are busy or you are not busy. That's all. Perhaps it's different for Wachtell, but there's no NYC firm that makes you work so much all the time that you literally no life. There are some months where you absolutely have no life to be sure. But other times, it's not as bad and you do have some free time.Anonymous User wrote:I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: NYC to 200k
No hours requirement here. Billed well under 2k. Full boneus.
Chupalo
Chupalo
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Losing hope for OMM...
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
What about incoming associates? Will they be on the 180 or 190 scale?Anonymous User wrote:Mayer Brown matched raises and bonuses. you need 1900 prorated hours by the end of June and if you don't hit it now but hit it end of year, they'll include it in your year-end bonus.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
At an hours requirement firm. Billed 1450 last year and got 90% bonus. Took all my vacation time.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Welcome to the transcontinental pity party with all us DC associates.Anonymous User wrote:Losing hope for OMM...
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Same. But got no bonused.Anonymous User wrote:At an hours requirement firm. Billed 1450 last year and got 90% bonus. Took all my vacation time.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
This is correct.Anonymous User wrote:At a firm with no billable requirement, you just don't think about hours at all. You are busy or you are not busy. That's all. Perhaps it's different for Wachtell, but there's no NYC firm that makes you work so much all the time that you literally have no life. There are some months where you absolutely have no life to be sure. But other times, it's not as bad and you do have some free time.Anonymous User wrote:I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
The average associate in nyc V5 is not billing 2400 in my experience. As an associate at S&C, we are shown figures by firm management that average associate hours are around 1700-1800 (which is less than average partner billables). I personally billed 1750 as a 3rd year and got full bonus, no comment at all about hours in reviews. This is not atypical. At Skadden I would have gotten no bonus, which would have sucked.
Obviously there are people who get crushed but remember sometimes it’s your fault if you don’t step off the treadmill. Being at a no minimum firm is highly, highly preferable.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Anon from above. I would have been fine getting no bonus. Ask anyone here if they'd trade 20k of pre-tax comp for 550 less hours billed. Almost everyone would take it. Gonna weasel my way to lasting another year here and then gtfo of this awful industry.Anonymous User wrote:Same. But got no bonused.Anonymous User wrote:At an hours requirement firm. Billed 1450 last year and got 90% bonus. Took all my vacation time.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
This. And I'll keep doing it until my TTT firm matches.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
im watching all three world cup games every day
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I was just shy of bonus by ~50 hours and got zero.Anonymous User wrote:Same. But got no bonused.Anonymous User wrote:At an hours requirement firm. Billed 1450 last year and got 90% bonus. Took all my vacation time.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Skadden’s state of the firm said average associate billables (including permitted marketing / pro bono etc) were 1750. Skadden’s bonus threshold is 1800. I think people here are underestimating how many people get screwed.Anonymous User wrote:I was just shy of bonus by ~50 hours and got zero.Anonymous User wrote:Same. But got no bonused.Anonymous User wrote:At an hours requirement firm. Billed 1450 last year and got 90% bonus. Took all my vacation time.
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
if u were at skadden, you coulda billed 50 to pro bono and got your bonus. for all intents and purposes, that's the same.Anonymous User wrote:This is correct.Anonymous User wrote:At a firm with no billable requirement, you just don't think about hours at all. You are busy or you are not busy. That's all. Perhaps it's different for Wachtell, but there's no NYC firm that makes you work so much all the time that you literally have no life. There are some months where you absolutely have no life to be sure. But other times, it's not as bad and you do have some free time.Anonymous User wrote:I think that the best for associates is having a low hours requirement, like 1900. Super easy to hit, and if I am way over pace I can spend days or weeks with a light workload billing 3-4 hours a day and not feeling pressured to frantically search for more work. If there was no requirement, I think the expectation would be “why are you barely working? This is a work day do something.” But with a low requirement people are like “oh damn on pace for 2,300? Yeah, enjoy this slow time when you can!”
I’m totally speculating here, but that’s how I would picture it.
The average associate in nyc V5 is not billing 2400 in my experience. As an associate at S&C, we are shown figures by firm management that average associate hours are around 1700-1800 (which is less than average partner billables). I personally billed 1750 as a 3rd year and got full bonus, no comment at all about hours in reviews. This is not atypical. At Skadden I would have gotten no bonus, which would have sucked.
Obviously there are people who get crushed but remember sometimes it’s your fault if you don’t step off the treadmill. Being at a no minimum firm is highly, highly preferable.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
OMM will match. I feel like OMM's rep has already lost some cache (my baby boomer FIL talks about OMM like it's Gibson Dunn or Latham). But PPP is still high even though declining. I just don't think OMM wants to resign itself to second-tier status.Anonymous User wrote:Losing hope for OMM...
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I think OMM views Latham and Gibson as peer firms, so I wouldn't be shocked if we see a match from OMM soon.Anonymous User wrote:OMM will match. I feel like OMM's rep has already lost some cache (my baby boomer FIL talks about OMM like it's Gibson Dunn or Latham). But PPP is still high even though declining. I just don't think OMM wants to resign itself to second-tier status.Anonymous User wrote:Losing hope for OMM...
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I would be shocked to see a match from Latham soon. Where the hell are those guys?Anonymous User wrote:I think OMM views Latham and Gibson as peer firms, so I wouldn't be shocked if we see a match from OMM soon.Anonymous User wrote:OMM will match. I feel like OMM's rep has already lost some cache (my baby boomer FIL talks about OMM like it's Gibson Dunn or Latham). But PPP is still high even though declining. I just don't think OMM wants to resign itself to second-tier status.Anonymous User wrote:Losing hope for OMM...
-
- Posts: 427956
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I get the feeling that reported averages include laterals, people who took time a large amount of time off (maternity leave or otherwise), people on part time arrangements, etc. Wonder if they even count stub years. I don't think they're at all representative of what a typical associate would bill over the course of 12 months.Anonymous User wrote:
This is correct.
The average associate in nyc V5 is not billing 2400 in my experience. As an associate at S&C, we are shown figures by firm management that average associate hours are around 1700-1800 (which is less than average partner billables). I personally billed 1750 as a 3rd year and got full bonus, no comment at all about hours in reviews. This is not atypical. At Skadden I would have gotten no bonus, which would have sucked.
Obviously there are people who get crushed but remember sometimes it’s your fault if you don’t step off the treadmill. Being at a no minimum firm is highly, highly preferable.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login