What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

What sounds more impressive on resume

cum laude
4
36%
with Honors
4
36%
with Distinction
3
27%
 
Total votes: 11

Anonymous User
Posts: 324933
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:17 pm

I've seen all of these used to mean basically the same thing. What sounds better to you?

Just wondering.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
4LTsPointingNorth

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:17 am

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby 4LTsPointingNorth » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:23 pm

This can't be a serious post, but I will give it a completely serious response.

All three are problematic and should be avoided.

"Cum Laude" to me just screams "not quite smart enough for 'Magna Cum Laude' or 'Summa Cum Laude.'"

"With honors" just screams "Without high honors" to me.

"With distinction" just seems like a made up award for effort.

I think the best bet is to just have a clean listing of the school attended in the attorney bio without any descriptors.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29316
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I've seen all of these used to mean basically the same thing. What sounds better to you?

Just wondering.

Whichever one your school uses.

(Signed, Nony Mouse, BA cum laude.)

dudders

Bronze
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby dudders » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:25 pm

I don't think you really have any control over which type of language your school uses. Latin or not ... go with how your school lists it on your diploma. Mine says "with honors" and I'm not going to change it to "cum laude"

Nebby

Diamond
Posts: 31199
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby Nebby » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:27 pm

cum lauder

Anonymous User
Posts: 324933
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:34 pm

I agree with "Cum Laude" = "not quite smart enough for 'Magna Cum Laude' or 'Summa Cum Laude.'"

"With distinction" sounds like it could be any award, including a pro bono award. Too broad.

"With honors" sounds best, because many folks don't realize/know that "With High Honors" or "With Highest Honors" exist. And "With honors" sounds decently broad to cover all three (honors, high honors and highest honors).

User avatar
poptart123

Silver
Posts: 1153
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby poptart123 » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:40 pm

Keeper of the Peregrinus tbh

http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/peregrinus/keeper

If I went to UT I would shoot for #4 just for that

User avatar
KissMyAxe

Bronze
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction

Postby KissMyAxe » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:58 pm

poptart123 wrote:Keeper of the Peregrinus tbh

http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/peregrinus/keeper

If I went to UT I would shoot for #4 just for that


TITCR

Image



Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.