Bonus Speculation

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
Lincoln
Posts: 1193
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Lincoln » Tue Dec 05, 2017 6:37 pm

A TTT bonus practice I wasn't aware of until recently is that Quinn Emanuel doesn't pay bonuses to associates who weren't there a full year. That doesn't sound like a big deal, but consider this scenario:

Lincoln graduated from a T6 law school (with six figures of debt, obviously) in 2015 and joined hotshot, fast-growing litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel in September 2015. Lincoln worked at Quinn and billed about 1 million hours before leaving the firm in August 2016 for a preftigious clerkship. Lincoln obviously didn't get a bonus in 2016 because he was not employed in December.

After finishing the clerkship, Lincoln then returned to Quinn in September 2017. My understanding is that Quinn will not pay Lincoln any bonus in 2017. Lincoln's first bonus will instead be in December 2018, but which time Lincoln will have worked at Quinn for 28 months and billed about 8 billion hours.

By contrast, Lincoln's buddy, Seward, graduated from the same T6 law school also in 2015. Seward joined the litigation department of a V5 firm. (I'll let you venture a guess at which firm Seward joined.) Seward also left to clerk in August 2016 and returned to his V5 firm in September 2017. In December 2017, Seward will receive a bonus that is pro-rated for both 2016 and 2017, meaning that he'll receive 8/12*15,000+4/12*25,000 = $18,333.

User avatar
rpupkin
Posts: 5629
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby rpupkin » Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:05 pm

Lincoln wrote:A TTT bonus practice I wasn't aware of until recently is that Quinn Emanuel doesn't pay bonuses to associates who weren't there a full year. That doesn't sound like a big deal, but consider this scenario:

Lincoln graduated from a T6 law school (with six figures of debt, obviously) in 2015 and joined hotshot, fast-growing litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel in September 2015. Lincoln worked at Quinn and billed about 1 million hours before leaving the firm in August 2016 for a preftigious clerkship. Lincoln obviously didn't get a bonus in 2016 because he was not employed in December.

After finishing the clerkship, Lincoln then returned to Quinn in September 2017. My understanding is that Quinn will not pay Lincoln any bonus in 2017. Lincoln's first bonus will instead be in December 2018, but which time Lincoln will have worked at Quinn for 28 months and billed about 8 billion hours.

It doesn't surprise me that Quinn operates that way. But it's definitely not just a QE thing; I know people at other big law firms who have been treated similarly when leaving to clerk and then returning.

Also, there's a glaring weakness in your hypo: Who would leave Quinn "for a prftigious clerkship" and then return to Quinn afterward?

User avatar
Lincoln
Posts: 1193
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Lincoln » Wed Dec 06, 2017 3:08 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Lincoln wrote:A TTT bonus practice I wasn't aware of until recently is that Quinn Emanuel doesn't pay bonuses to associates who weren't there a full year. That doesn't sound like a big deal, but consider this scenario:

Lincoln graduated from a T6 law school (with six figures of debt, obviously) in 2015 and joined hotshot, fast-growing litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel in September 2015. Lincoln worked at Quinn and billed about 1 million hours before leaving the firm in August 2016 for a preftigious clerkship. Lincoln obviously didn't get a bonus in 2016 because he was not employed in December.

After finishing the clerkship, Lincoln then returned to Quinn in September 2017. My understanding is that Quinn will not pay Lincoln any bonus in 2017. Lincoln's first bonus will instead be in December 2018, but which time Lincoln will have worked at Quinn for 28 months and billed about 8 billion hours.

It doesn't surprise me that Quinn operates that way. But it's definitely not just a QE thing; I know people at other big law firms who have been treated similarly when leaving to clerk and then returning.

Also, there's a glaring weakness in your hypo: Who would leave Quinn "for a prftigious clerkship" and then return to Quinn afterward?


Well, I know at least one person who did, which is why I know about this policy.

I think it's bullshit, and the relevant firms should be shamed for it.

nybar2017
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:42 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby nybar2017 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 3:44 pm

Wouldn't the person in your hypo get a 70k clerkship bonus?

User avatar
SplitMyPants
Posts: 1617
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby SplitMyPants » Wed Dec 06, 2017 4:01 pm

nybar2017 wrote:Wouldn't the person in your hypo get a 70k clerkship bonus?


that's only supposed to help out with compensating for the shit clerkship pay...
even then, bc prestige isn't free, you're not made whole vis-a-vis a year of big law salary

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5991
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby 2014 » Wed Dec 06, 2017 4:43 pm

Getting a full bonus upon your return to the same firm from a clerkship is generally up for negotiation before you depart (anecdotally based on multiple NY firms), though most have a baseline rule of a prorated bonus the year you return rather than no bonus. I say that just to point out that there's a chance that the QE person didn't advocate well enough for themselves, even if the general rule smells a little TTT.

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 4:49 pm

Came to Quinn after a clerkship (although I was not returning to the firm) and got a clerkship bonus and prorated bonus based on class year. Suspect your friend will get the same.

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:06 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Came to Quinn after a clerkship (although I was not returning to the firm) and got a clerkship bonus and prorated bonus based on class year. Suspect your friend will get the same.


Still negotiable if you ask before accepting the offer, though, yes, what you describe is the default if you don't ask.

Quinn is also notoriously cheap, though.

User avatar
Pokemon
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Pokemon » Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:45 pm

This thread is off-topic. Cravats associates are leaving the firm in droves, only way to stop them is the raise to 200

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 6:09 pm

bonuses at 30-50% of associate's salary?! So...are my calculations right (assuming bare minimum 30%)? If so, this is INSANE.

1st year: 54k (!!!)
2nd: 57k
3rd: 63k

https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/califor ... t-bonuses/

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 6:31 pm

Anonymous User wrote:bonuses at 30-50% of associate's salary?! So...are my calculations right (assuming bare minimum 30%)? If so, this is INSANE.

1st year: 54k (!!!)
2nd: 57k
3rd: 63k

https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/califor ... t-bonuses/


Not to discount the fact that these bonuses are great, but a fed clerkship (or two) is a given for almost all HH associates. Bonuses don't seem as dramatic if everyone's coming in as a third year. i.e.. 50k vs 63k

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 6:33 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:bonuses at 30-50% of associate's salary?! So...are my calculations right (assuming bare minimum 30%)? If so, this is INSANE.

1st year: 54k (!!!)
2nd: 57k
3rd: 63k

https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/califor ... t-bonuses/


Not to discount the fact that these bonuses are great, but a fed clerkship (or two) is a given for almost all HH associates. Bonuses don't seem as dramatic if everyone's coming in as a third year. i.e.. 50k vs 63k


I guess but I am pretty sure 3rd years are getting around 50% bonuses (105k) given how everyone who works there is always saying their bonuses are insane.

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:43 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:bonuses at 30-50% of associate's salary?! So...are my calculations right (assuming bare minimum 30%)? If so, this is INSANE.

1st year: 54k (!!!)
2nd: 57k
3rd: 63k

https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/califor ... t-bonuses/


Not to discount the fact that these bonuses are great, but a fed clerkship (or two) is a given for almost all HH associates. Bonuses don't seem as dramatic if everyone's coming in as a third year. i.e.. 50k vs 63k


I guess but I am pretty sure 3rd years are getting around 50% bonuses (105k) given how everyone who works there is always saying their bonuses are insane.


50% is pretty rare and reserved for the top billers (2500+ at least), and IMO, not worth it for the extra hours; but at least they pay up if you do hit that due to multiple trials etc. 30% is more common for juniors with "normal" hours, but 40% is also common if you had good hours and do good work, particularly for mid-levels and the few senior associates. Still kicks the crap out of market, particularly if you are a junior. It gets compressed the more senior you get, though.

As noted, there aren't really any true first years. Most are former clerks and/or mid-level laterals. There's a lot more individual discretion to bonuses (within the 30-50% band) depending on who you work with, your contributions to the firm, etc., even though the firm treats everyone pretty generously.

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:47 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:bonuses at 30-50% of associate's salary?! So...are my calculations right (assuming bare minimum 30%)? If so, this is INSANE.

1st year: 54k (!!!)
2nd: 57k
3rd: 63k

https://abovethelaw.com/2017/12/califor ... t-bonuses/


Not to discount the fact that these bonuses are great, but a fed clerkship (or two) is a given for almost all HH associates. Bonuses don't seem as dramatic if everyone's coming in as a third year. i.e.. 50k vs 63k


I guess but I am pretty sure 3rd years are getting around 50% bonuses (105k) given how everyone who works there is always saying their bonuses are insane.


50% is pretty rare and reserved for the top billers (2500+ at least), and IMO, not worth it for the extra hours; but at least they pay up if you do hit that due to multiple trials etc. 30% is more common for juniors with "normal" hours, but 40% is also common if you had good hours and do good work, particularly for mid-levels and the few senior associates. Still kicks the crap out of market, particularly if you are a junior. It gets compressed the more senior you get, though.

As noted, there aren't really any true first years. Most are former clerks and/or mid-level laterals. There's a lot more individual discretion to bonuses (within the 30-50% band) depending on who you work with, your contributions to the firm, etc., even though the firm treats everyone pretty generously.


Good to know. Do you work at HH?

Anonymous User
Posts: 302686
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:00 pm

Morgan Lewis match plus additional "discretionary" bonuses for top performing associates.

anonnymouse
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: Bonus Speculation

Postby anonnymouse » Sun Dec 10, 2017 10:15 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Morgan Lewis match plus additional "discretionary" bonuses for top performing associates.

Discretionary bonus was not getting no-offered as a summer.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.