K&E investment funds group

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
masque du pantsu

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby masque du pantsu » Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:59 pm

TheSpecialist wrote:
Rahviveh wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Rahviveh wrote:You can't possibly find this stuff interesting. Please do something else with your life


Some people do find it interesting. I personally like fund formation work a lot. The negotiation, complex tax structuring, rules and regulations, etc.

Op, you will be negotiating stupid indemnities and reps in side letters for dozens of investors. It's the ultimate paper pushing job. Also why do you think you would be doing the complex tax structuring (whatever tf that means). The tax people will do that. You will be the monkey inputting their comments and relaying them to the client. Be honest with yourself.



Just lol at any transactional attorney trying to talk crap about another group because its "paper pushing" or it's "monkey" work. Newsflash: That's all transactional work, particularly at the junior associate level. The business people are in charge and you're just there to paper the deal. It's all boring to the average person and everyone has varying interests in what they can tolerate or ideally find somewhat interesting. Because getting signature pages and sitting on 4 hour diligence calls, the majority of which you're simply introducing the various specialists/managing time is SOO incredibly important and interesting.


This isn't really correct. There is papering in every transactional practice (memorializing promises so that they can be enforced is kind of the whole point), but some are absolutely worse than others. For example in M&A, because of business / legal term overlap and the number of deals you have seen, business people will ask for your input on a lot of shit once you get more senior. Agreed that junior work is boring regardless, but how long it takes before that changes does vary.

Do not discount exactly how boring fund formation work is for a junior. Like, you think you will be structuring and drafting LPAs and shit like that. You will not be, not really. You will get a call from some partner saying "hey great news we're launching a new fund" and you'll think to yourself, great, i'll get to think about drafting, tax structuring, etc. But no, all they want you to do is take all of the documents from "[ ] Opportunities IV Fund" and change all the references to "[ ] Opportunities V Fund," and they want it right now right now right now. I did some work in our funds group before choosing a permanent home and there is a reason why i didn't choose it, although the people were cool.

One thing about K&E's practice though. I have heard that they use funds work as a loss-leader to generate general corporate / M&A business, and I think they may even share generation credit for that work. So if you were in it for hte long haul (rather than to jump ship for a Hedge Fund counsel job), at least you'd get more respect than at other non-boutique law firms?

User avatar
LaLiLuLeLo

Silver
Posts: 638
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby LaLiLuLeLo » Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:09 pm

masque du pantsu wrote:
TheSpecialist wrote:
Rahviveh wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Rahviveh wrote:You can't possibly find this stuff interesting. Please do something else with your life


Some people do find it interesting. I personally like fund formation work a lot. The negotiation, complex tax structuring, rules and regulations, etc.

Op, you will be negotiating stupid indemnities and reps in side letters for dozens of investors. It's the ultimate paper pushing job. Also why do you think you would be doing the complex tax structuring (whatever tf that means). The tax people will do that. You will be the monkey inputting their comments and relaying them to the client. Be honest with yourself.



Just lol at any transactional attorney trying to talk crap about another group because its "paper pushing" or it's "monkey" work. Newsflash: That's all transactional work, particularly at the junior associate level. The business people are in charge and you're just there to paper the deal. It's all boring to the average person and everyone has varying interests in what they can tolerate or ideally find somewhat interesting. Because getting signature pages and sitting on 4 hour diligence calls, the majority of which you're simply introducing the various specialists/managing time is SOO incredibly important and interesting.


Do not discount exactly how boring fund formation work is for a junior. Like, you think you will be structuring and drafting LPAs and shit like that. You will not be, not really. You will get a call from some partner saying "hey great news we're launching a new fund" and you'll think to yourself, great, i'll get to think about drafting, tax structuring, etc. But no, all they want you to do is take all of the documents from "[ ] Opportunities IV Fund" and change all the references to "[ ] Opportunities V Fund," and they want it right now right now right now. I did some work in our funds group before choosing a permanent home and there is a reason why i didn't choose it, although the people were cool.


You nailed it. This is exactly what I meant when I said sequentially numbered deals are the worst.

liam31

New
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2017 4:35 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby liam31 » Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:17 pm

masque du pantsu wrote:
TheSpecialist wrote:
Rahviveh wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Rahviveh wrote:You can't possibly find this stuff interesting. Please do something else with your life


Some people do find it interesting. I personally like fund formation work a lot. The negotiation, complex tax structuring, rules and regulations, etc.

Op, you will be negotiating stupid indemnities and reps in side letters for dozens of investors. It's the ultimate paper pushing job. Also why do you think you would be doing the complex tax structuring (whatever tf that means). The tax people will do that. You will be the monkey inputting their comments and relaying them to the client. Be honest with yourself.



Just lol at any transactional attorney trying to talk crap about another group because its "paper pushing" or it's "monkey" work. Newsflash: That's all transactional work, particularly at the junior associate level. The business people are in charge and you're just there to paper the deal. It's all boring to the average person and everyone has varying interests in what they can tolerate or ideally find somewhat interesting. Because getting signature pages and sitting on 4 hour diligence calls, the majority of which you're simply introducing the various specialists/managing time is SOO incredibly important and interesting.


. . .

One thing about K&E's practice though. I have heard that they use funds work as a loss-leader to generate general corporate / M&A business, and I think they may even share generation credit for that work. So if you were in it for hte long haul (rather than to jump ship for a Hedge Fund counsel job), at least you'd get more respect than at other non-boutique law firms?


Not sure I follow this part. Why would someone get more respect in this scenario?

masque du pantsu

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby masque du pantsu » Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:02 pm

well, i guess setting aside firms like Sutherland with their BDC practice (i.e., ones that really sell their funds work, whether registered or private), the private funds and 40 Act groups in large law firms sometimes feel kind of like an afterthought. My understanding, and this could be wrong, is that K&E does a good job of maximizing cross-selling opportunities (e.g., we'll form your funds for free if you also use us for the corporate/M&A stuff), and that even if the general corporate group is the only one billing for the work, Funds gets credit for it too. Granted this only matters later on if you (a) deicde you want to stay (a biiiiiig "if") and (b) manage to get to share partner (another big "if").

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:50 pm

masque du pantsu wrote: My understanding, and this could be wrong, is that K&E does a good job of maximizing cross-selling opportunities (e.g., we'll form your funds for free if you also use us for the corporate/M&A stuff), and that even if the general corporate group is the only one billing for the work, Funds gets credit for it too.


K&E Funds Associate here. This is wildly inaccurate. We do not offer up free fund formation work as a form of begging to get general corporate work.

The firm's private equity focus lends itself to a much different dynamic w/r/t to the funds group than that of other firms. We work more in the mid-market PE space as opposed to the the mega-funds like KKR and Blackstone. The work is repetitive, yes, but that's a good thing from a business perspective when you're model is based on churning a high volume of funds.

The funds group is viewed as a great source of business not because we throw it in as a teaser for corporate work, but because it makes sense from an efficiency perspective to use the same firm that structured your fund to, for example, make acquisitions on behalf of the fund. Mid-market PE shops can be very cost sensitive and, if they liked the job the firm did in the formation phase, they'd like to save costs by using the firm for other corporate work as well.

I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:52 pm

masque du pantsu wrote:well, i guess setting aside firms like Sutherland with their BDC practice (i.e., ones that really sell their funds work, whether registered or private), the private funds and 40 Act groups in large law firms sometimes feel kind of like an afterthought. My understanding, and this could be wrong, is that K&E does a good job of maximizing cross-selling opportunities (e.g., we'll form your funds for free if you also use us for the corporate/M&A stuff), and that even if the general corporate group is the only one billing for the work, Funds gets credit for it too. Granted this only matters later on if you (a) deicde you want to stay (a biiiiiig "if") and (b) manage to get to share partner (another big "if").


Your understanding is incorrect now. It use to be like that, but in the last 5 years the fund formation group has become a big fish at K&E and grown like crazy both in size and clout. Not as big as M&A and Bankruptcy of course but you can tell they are doing very well because of the number of share partners (at least in NY) they have been making from what I hear. They also have a ton of clients that bring them revenue that M&A share partners I work with are trying to pitch for their work all the time. The funds group at K&E is no longer a service practice. It generates significant revenue for the firm according to M&A share partners I work with. I'm a M&A mid-level associate at K&E's NY office.

masque du pantsu

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby masque du pantsu » Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:07 pm

to the two of you above, i stand corrected!

User avatar
JusticeHarlan

Gold
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby JusticeHarlan » Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:29 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:40 pm

JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:13 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).

AANNOONN1234

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:19 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby AANNOONN1234 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:10 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).


They just took the two biggest funds partners from Proskauer in the Boston office though, so they are making big moves in that space

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:33 am

AANNOONN1234 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).


They just took the two biggest funds partners from Proskauer in the Boston office though, so they are making big moves in that space


This is another overstatement. K&E took two young partners. The biggest partners and the rainmakers did not leave.

AANNOONN1234

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:19 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby AANNOONN1234 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:14 am

Anonymous User wrote:
AANNOONN1234 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).


They just took the two biggest funds partners from Proskauer in the Boston office though, so they are making big moves in that space


This is another overstatement. K&E took two young partners. The biggest partners and the rainmakers did not leave.


From the article: "Kirkland & Ellis LLP has added Sean Hill and Stephanie Berdik as partners at the law firm’s investment funds group. Previously, Hill and Berdik worked at Proskauer Rose LLP. Hill was the co-head of the private investment funds group." Co-head of the funds group at a firm like Proskauer is significant move.

https://www.pehub.com/2017/06/kirkland- ... wo-hires/#

From another article "Hill said most of his clients are moving with him to Kirkland, including Ares Management, Lexington Partners, WhiteHorse Liquidity Partners and THL Credit."

http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=120279 ... auer-Hires

User avatar
JusticeHarlan

Gold
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby JusticeHarlan » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:35 am

AANNOONN1234 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
AANNOONN1234 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).


They just took the two biggest funds partners from Proskauer in the Boston office though, so they are making big moves in that space


This is another overstatement. K&E took two young partners. The biggest partners and the rainmakers did not leave.


From the article: "Kirkland & Ellis LLP has added Sean Hill and Stephanie Berdik as partners at the law firm’s investment funds group. Previously, Hill and Berdik worked at Proskauer Rose LLP. Hill was the co-head of the private investment funds group." Co-head of the funds group at a firm like Proskauer is significant move.

https://www.pehub.com/2017/06/kirkland- ... wo-hires/#

From another article "Hill said most of his clients are moving with him to Kirkland, including Ares Management, Lexington Partners, WhiteHorse Liquidity Partners and THL Credit."

http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=120279 ... auer-Hires

The first one isn't an article, it's a K&E press release. The second one says he's taking a bunch of clients, but that's just quoting him, what else is he gonna say? It may be true or it may not be.

But this is all shifting the goalposts. The argument made was that Kirkland has "little, if any, competition for work" in Boston which is clearly not true even given recent hires. Proskauer still has all six partners called out in their fund formation write-up on Chambers. If you're just trying to say they're making waves in Boston in this field, cool, no one is arguing against that. But the argument that they're the only game in town is clearly wrong.

AANNOONN1234

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:19 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby AANNOONN1234 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:40 am

I mean I'm not the one who posted there's no competition, just trying to point out they are making moves. You're right about that, the PE market in Boston isn't stagnant or noncompetitive.

RaceJudicata

Gold
Posts: 1690
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby RaceJudicata » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:39 pm

Who knew there were so many territorial IM attorneys out there!

User avatar
SmokeytheBear

Silver
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:40 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby SmokeytheBear » Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:01 pm

AANNOONN1234 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
AANNOONN1234 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).


They just took the two biggest funds partners from Proskauer in the Boston office though, so they are making big moves in that space


This is another overstatement. K&E took two young partners. The biggest partners and the rainmakers did not leave.


From the article: "Kirkland & Ellis LLP has added Sean Hill and Stephanie Berdik as partners at the law firm’s investment funds group. Previously, Hill and Berdik worked at Proskauer Rose LLP. Hill was the co-head of the private investment funds group." Co-head of the funds group at a firm like Proskauer is significant move.

https://www.pehub.com/2017/06/kirkland- ... wo-hires/#

From another article "Hill said most of his clients are moving with him to Kirkland, including Ares Management, Lexington Partners, WhiteHorse Liquidity Partners and THL Credit."

http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=120279 ... auer-Hires

The first one isn't an article, it's a K&E press release. The second one says he's taking a bunch of clients, but that's just quoting him, what else is he gonna say? It may be true or it may not be.

But this is all shifting the goalposts. The argument made was that Kirkland has "little, if any, competition for work" in Boston which is clearly not true even given recent hires. Proskauer still has all six partners called out in their fund formation write-up on Chambers. If you're just trying to say they're making waves in Boston in this field, cool, no one is arguing against that. But the argument that they're the only game in town is clearly wrong.


I'm going to add the above K&E homerism to my ever continuing campaign of K&E being full of dicks.

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:06 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I would also add that Kirkland is basically the only firm doing this type of work in some markets. In contrast to some NY funds practices (which is of course the biggest market), Kirkland is also doing a ton of funds work in SF, LA, Boston and Houston where there is little, if any, competition for work.

That seems like like an overstatement with respect to Boston. Just because they took some talent from Ropes doesn't mean they put Ropes out of the fund formation business, not to mention Goodwin and Proskauer (they do more venture funds but also some PE).


Yeah - agree with that. In addition, the largest PE firm in LA (Ares Management) uses Proskauer for all of their fund formation work I believe. I wasn't even aware that Kirkland had a fund formation practice in LA.


Yes - This is a wildly innaccurate statement, particularly with respect to LA. Proskauer is doing all of the work for Ares (which isn't just the biggest PE firm in LA, but one of the biggest PE firms period).


I will also point out that my firm (big LA outpost of NY firm) has starting chipping away at Proskauer's grip on Ares in LA and Proskauer is PISSED. I've been on a few phone calls with Waxman and Woronoff and our partners and Woronoff gets soooooo pissy whenever Waxman defers to us.

Point is again to refute the above: Kirkland is but an equal player, at best, in LA in fund formation.

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Rahviveh » Tue Sep 12, 2017 2:33 pm

Cringe worthy exxchange. None of this BS about what's going on in the "space" matters to your day to day life as an associate

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:05 pm

I am the anon from above that made the "little, if any competition" comment.

I apologize - didn't mean to say there was no competition in any of those markets. I think in SF and Houston there is relatively little, but yes there are established funds practices in Boston and LA.

Still, in contrast to NY, we are talking about, what, 2-3 firms doing real funds work in those markets? My overarching point was to contrast Kirkland's model to the "service groups" in the NY market.

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:21 am

Can someone chime in on the group in NYC? What is the typically day? Do you ever leave prior to 7pm? is there any balance? thinking of switching firms

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:28 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Can someone chime in on the group in NYC? What is the typically day? Do you ever leave prior to 7pm? is there any balance? thinking of switching firms


I'm a midlevel associate in the K&E NYC funds group and lateraled from the funds group at another V10 in the city (not STB). The hours at K&E are approximately as bad as my prior firm, with the "typical day" being about the same as my prior firm -- an assortment of conference calls, projects due in a day or so, and urgent projects because either the client or the partner needs something NOW. A lot of the "drafting" consists of modifying precedent, though it's more complicated than changing defined terms. Not sure if that's a function of finally being senior enough to get the good stuff or if it is due to the firm -- I lateraled at right around the time my work at my prior firm started to be interesting so I think it's primarily due to timing but am not positive.

Within NYC, I think STB, Debevoise and K&E are perceived as the market leaders in funds, meaning that even though I came from another well-regarded firm, it's been a step up in terms of my practice . I made the move primarily for financial reasons and expected it to be otherwise about the same, but I was surprised by how much more sophisticated the work is. When you represent a huge number of sponsors, there's a much better sense of "market," a far deeper bench of experience on any issue (simply because more people have worked on a wider range of deals) and a very developed set of precedents, all of which were missing at my prior firm. It's not uncommon to see group-wide emails asking about how people have handled situations with specific LPs, which just isn't feasible unless a firm represents hundreds of sponsors. The bonuses really are better, though it's not a life-changing difference. My recollection of the presentation we got during bonus season last year is that the median associate received 1.25x-1.4x the market bonus (they only gave ranges so I don't have more exact numbers).

There are definitely dicks, but I'm almost a year in and have found it manageable and found most of the horror stories to be overblown. I don't think there are materially more assholes (or that they are bigger assholes) than the flagship group at my prior firm, many of whom I had the "pleasure" of working with.

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:18 pm

It's not uncommon to see group-wide emails asking about how people have handled situations with specific LPs, which just isn't feasible unless a firm represents hundreds of sponsors.


It is probably better if you didn't go around and admit in writing to violating NDAs. Just sayin'.

Anonymous User
Posts: 316621
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:04 pm

What is the typical day, time wise? When do you usually get in and when do you leave? Do a lot do people work from home after a certain time?

tripu11

New
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:16 am

Re: K&E investment funds group

Postby tripu11 » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:30 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
It's not uncommon to see group-wide emails asking about how people have handled situations with specific LPs, which just isn't feasible unless a firm represents hundreds of sponsors.


It is probably better if you didn't go around and admit in writing to violating NDAs. Just sayin'.


Lol. What NDA do you think is possibly violated?



Return to “Legal Employment?

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.