Is anyone who is going through / has gone through recruiting surprised as to what extent all the BL firms praise their tobacco defense practice?
I'm not making the political/ethical argument that big tobacco shouldn't have the right to counsel, but I just thought given all the bad publicity over the years about smoking that these firms would keep their tobacco work more on the DL.
Thoughts?
Tobacco Lit Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 12:50 pm
Re: Tobacco Lit
I actually had an interesting experience at OCI with this. My resume is clearly progressive. So I've gotten a few "can you defend corporations" questions. This partner, however, brought up their tobacco defense and said, "we actually allow people to conscientiously object from working for that client - that's the only one we do that for."Anonymous User wrote:Is anyone who is going through / has gone through recruiting surprised as to what extent all the BL firms praise their tobacco defense practice?
I'm not making the political/ethical argument that big tobacco shouldn't have the right to counsel, but I just thought given all the bad publicity over the years about smoking that these firms would keep their tobacco work more on the DL.
Thoughts?
Which was interesting.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Tobacco Lit
One thing I've learned working on similar litigation is that while the client is sometimes clearly in the moral wrong, there's also a ton of overreaching by the plaintiff's bar (the competition for victims is steep), and there's very often more types of defendants than just the tobacco companies themselves.flashdril wrote:I actually had an interesting experience at OCI with this. My resume is clearly progressive. So I've gotten a few "can you defend corporations" questions. This partner, however, brought up their tobacco defense and said, "we actually allow people to conscientiously object from working for that client - that's the only one we do that for."Anonymous User wrote:Is anyone who is going through / has gone through recruiting surprised as to what extent all the BL firms praise their tobacco defense practice?
I'm not making the political/ethical argument that big tobacco shouldn't have the right to counsel, but I just thought given all the bad publicity over the years about smoking that these firms would keep their tobacco work more on the DL.
Thoughts?
Which was interesting.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login