Latham Watkins v. Gibson Dunn (NY)?

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:40 pm

Latham Watkins v. Gibson Dunn (NY)?

Postby sonny@cheeba » Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:42 pm

I'm very interested in practicing in New York after law school. I am not, however, fully aware of the transactional practices at both offices. I was wondering if anyone could give me the inside scoop as to which would be a better fit for a prospective student interested in corporate finance, private equity, etc.


Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:18 pm

Re: Latham Watkins v. Gibson Dunn (NY)?

Postby SLS_AMG » Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:50 pm

Latham & Watkins is better known for its corporate practice than its litigation practice.

Gibson Dunn is better known for its litigation practice than its corporate practice.

Both of these reputations hold true in New York.

Hope this helps.

Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.