Reg Consulting v Normal In-House Gig

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 326350
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Reg Consulting v Normal In-House Gig

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:42 am

Leaving CA biglaw firm (midlevel corp associate) soon, have two offers. One with internal regulatory consulting (not at a consulting firm - more like internal bank reg consulting) and one is a corporate in-house gig. Don't have a ton of reg experience, and that gig pays less. Also don't LOVE practicing law, but not sure regulatory consulting is enough of a departure from legal practice to be worth the pay cut / career redirection.

Anyone have any insight on the realities of regulatory consulting gigs? I realize I'm being sparse on details here - I guess I'm just concerned that reg consulting is dangerously close to compliance.

Anonymous User
Posts: 326350
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Reg Consulting v Normal In-House Gig

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:42 pm

bump



Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.