DOJ Honors Program 2017-18 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
DOJ Honors 2017-18
DOJ jus posted the participating components. Slim pickings.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:20 pm
DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
The components are up. Smaller number than last year, and several are "informal participants," but better than I expected considering the political climate.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Jinx! I merged the threads.
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Does anyone know what the process is re: informally participating components?
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Wow that is slim. Antitrust hired over 20 last year, and this year its two, and informal only.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
I'm an honors hire last year. Staying anon, but you can refer to me as Bob and I'll know you're asking me a Q. Happy to answer whatever I can.
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
You apply as usual but you can't list informally participating components as one of the three components you're choosing to send the application to, and it's up to them to decide what apps to look at and when if at all to interview and hire. So don't call them, they'll call you. I don't actually know of anyone getting hired through an informal component, but it might be different this round in that there are so many informal participants who normally hire through honors (like ATR and crim), they're probably hedging their bets due to budget issues and probably leadership replacements not having happened yet. So I think there will have to be some waiting-and-seeing.Anonymous User wrote:Does anyone know what the process is re: informally participating components?
(Actually I think there might be somewhere in the app to list which of the informal components you'd like to be considered by. But it's separate from your usual 3 selections and it doesn't guarantee anything - it still totally depends on what the component decides to do, and when.)
I'd bet that if they can ATR and crim will try to follow the usual schedule because they normally participate, but I'm just making that up. I would imagine a lot depends on where the budget and leadership are by the fall.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:20 pm
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
I did a quick comparison of this year's program with last year's. Please forgive any errors. The numbers in parentheses represent the number of positions available last year. Asterisks next to the informal components indicate that the component was a formal participant last year.
2017-18 Formal Participants
Civil Division - 10 (17)
-Federal Programs Branch - 3 (8)
-Office of Immigration Litigation - 7 (9)
Civil Rights Division - 2 (12)
Drug Enforcement Administration - 3 (3)
Environment & Natural Resources Division - 4-8 (12)
Executive Office for Immigration Review - 103 (108)
-Office of the Chief Immigration Judge - 97 (100)
-Office of General Counsel - 1 (1)
-Board of Immigration Appeals - 4 (4)
-Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer - 1 (1)
Federal Bureau of Investigation - 1-3 (2)
The Gaye L. Tenoso Indian Country Fellowship - 2 (1)
National Security Divsion - 2 (4)
United States Attorney's Offices - 3 (3)
-District of Arizona - 2 (2)
-District of Oregon - 1 (0)
2017-18 Informal Participants
Antitrust Division*** - 2 (22)
Civil Division*** - 12 (18)
-Appellate Staff - 3 (4)
-Commercial Litigation Branch - 3 (6)
-Consumer Protection Branch - 2 (2)
-Torts Branch - 4 (6)
Criminal Division*** - 9 (12)
-Regular Trial Attorney - 5 (9)
-Asset Forfeiture Fellowship Program - 4 (3)
Office of Information Policy - 1 (1)
Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties - 1 (0)
Tax Division*** - 3-6 (12)
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California - 1 (1)
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York - 1-2 (2)
U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia - 1 or more (1)
Last year, in the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Office of Legal Access Programs and the Office of Communication and Legislative Affairs were both formal participants and each had a single position available, with none this year. The Federal Bureau of Prisons was a formal participant at 4 positions, with none this year. The U.S. Trustee Program was a formal participant at 6 positions, with none this year. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Ohio was a formal participant at 1 position, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas was an informal participant at 1-2 positions (although obviously USAO's vary each year).
2017-18 Formal Participants
Civil Division - 10 (17)
-Federal Programs Branch - 3 (8)
-Office of Immigration Litigation - 7 (9)
Civil Rights Division - 2 (12)
Drug Enforcement Administration - 3 (3)
Environment & Natural Resources Division - 4-8 (12)
Executive Office for Immigration Review - 103 (108)
-Office of the Chief Immigration Judge - 97 (100)
-Office of General Counsel - 1 (1)
-Board of Immigration Appeals - 4 (4)
-Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer - 1 (1)
Federal Bureau of Investigation - 1-3 (2)
The Gaye L. Tenoso Indian Country Fellowship - 2 (1)
National Security Divsion - 2 (4)
United States Attorney's Offices - 3 (3)
-District of Arizona - 2 (2)
-District of Oregon - 1 (0)
2017-18 Informal Participants
Antitrust Division*** - 2 (22)
Civil Division*** - 12 (18)
-Appellate Staff - 3 (4)
-Commercial Litigation Branch - 3 (6)
-Consumer Protection Branch - 2 (2)
-Torts Branch - 4 (6)
Criminal Division*** - 9 (12)
-Regular Trial Attorney - 5 (9)
-Asset Forfeiture Fellowship Program - 4 (3)
Office of Information Policy - 1 (1)
Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties - 1 (0)
Tax Division*** - 3-6 (12)
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California - 1 (1)
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York - 1-2 (2)
U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia - 1 or more (1)
Last year, in the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Office of Legal Access Programs and the Office of Communication and Legislative Affairs were both formal participants and each had a single position available, with none this year. The Federal Bureau of Prisons was a formal participant at 4 positions, with none this year. The U.S. Trustee Program was a formal participant at 6 positions, with none this year. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Ohio was a formal participant at 1 position, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas was an informal participant at 1-2 positions (although obviously USAO's vary each year).
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
(Tagging non-anon for ease of future reference)
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:33 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
I'm an incoming honors hire, and I think this is probably the case. From my interactions with my component, it does seem that there's a lot of uncertainty regarding FY 18 & 19. The components are likely hedging their bets. If budgets are at or near current levels, then I would expect those components to do what they can to follow their normal hiring schedule.Anonymous User wrote:I'd bet that if they can ATR and crim will try to follow the usual schedule because they normally participate, but I'm just making that up. I would imagine a lot depends on where the budget and leadership are by the fall.
-
- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Yeah, they can only do normal hiring on Trump's budget, but we all know that is DOA in congress.Nosso wrote:I'm an incoming honors hire, and I think this is probably the case. From my interactions with my component, it does seem that there's a lot of uncertainty regarding FY 18 & 19. The components are likely hedging their bets. If budgets are at or near current levels, then I would expect those components to do what they can to follow their normal hiring schedule.Anonymous User wrote:I'd bet that if they can ATR and crim will try to follow the usual schedule because they normally participate, but I'm just making that up. I would imagine a lot depends on where the budget and leadership are by the fall.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Does DOJ reimburse moving expenses for these positions? I can't find relevant info online. I'd be moving from a few thousand miles away from DC.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
As a rising 3L likely to have a firm offer in hand going into the fall, is it out of bounds to accept the offer and still apply to DOJ honors? We will have to make a decision to accept or reject the firm offer before getting through the whole DOJ process.Anonymous User wrote:Nope.
- howmanylits
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 10:43 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Yea, Part V.B.2: "Candidates may request that an employer extend the deadline to accept the employer’s offer until as late as April 1 if the candidate is actively pursuing positions with public interest or government organizations. Candidates may hold open only one offer in such circumstances. Employers are encouraged to grant such requests."Gray wrote:Don't NALP rules require the firm to hold the offer open for a while if you are applying to government?Anonymous User wrote:As a rising 3L likely to have a firm offer in hand going into the fall, is it out of bounds to accept the offer and still apply to DOJ honors? We will have to make a decision to accept or reject the firm offer before getting through the whole DOJ process.Anonymous User wrote:Nope.
http://www.nalp.org/fulltextofnalpprinc ... Candidates
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
What are the prompts for the essays usually like? There's no info on the Arizona handbook.
- deuceindc
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
When I applied for SLIP, they were something like "why do you want to work for DOJ?" and "why are you interested in your top-choice component?"Anonymous User wrote:What are the prompts for the essays usually like? There's no info on the Arizona handbook.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:10 pm
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
Last year, they were:Anonymous User wrote:What are the prompts for the essays usually like? There's no info on the Arizona handbook.
If you could tell the selecting official one thing about yourself, what would it be? (2000 characters maximum)
Why do you want to work for the Department of Justice and what attracts you to the components you selected? (2000 characters maximum)
Describe the experiences or special skills you possess which you believe qualify you for a position as an Assistant U.S. Attorney and tell us why you want to be an Assistant U.S. Attorney. (2000 characters maximum) [required only if you applied to a USAO]
What role can an Assistant U.S. Attorney play in making our society a better place? (2000 characters maximum) [required only if you applied to a USAO]
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
I don't think the questions change; those are the same ones I had 4 years ago.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:10 pm
Re: DOJ Honors Program 2017-18
When I applied last year, I talked a lot with an alumnus who currently works at DOJ and used to be on the hiring committee for his office. He repeatedly stressed how important the essays are, since you don't submit a writing sample. Take them seriously and a spend a lot of time on them.
The one that asks you why you like your selected components is particularly tricky. You need to somehow talk meaningfully about each component you like, but, on the other hand, you can't seem too excited about one particular office because that will turn the other offices off. They will think they are just a fall-back. If you talk too broadly about the offices, you may not catch anyone's attention. It's a delicate balancing game.
For what it's worth, my approach was more all-or-nothing. I wrote almost exclusively about the one branch I wanted, and then included a quick blurb about how these other five offices also seemed cool. I ended up with an interview for my top choice and one of the "quick blurb" offices.
The one that asks you why you like your selected components is particularly tricky. You need to somehow talk meaningfully about each component you like, but, on the other hand, you can't seem too excited about one particular office because that will turn the other offices off. They will think they are just a fall-back. If you talk too broadly about the offices, you may not catch anyone's attention. It's a delicate balancing game.
For what it's worth, my approach was more all-or-nothing. I wrote almost exclusively about the one branch I wanted, and then included a quick blurb about how these other five offices also seemed cool. I ended up with an interview for my top choice and one of the "quick blurb" offices.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login