Columbia EIP 2017

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Jul 15, 2017 4:53 pm

What was the strike out rate for 2016? I saw participation rate was 91%, what % received an offer out of EIP?

TheoO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:28 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby TheoO » Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:29 pm

Bach-City wrote:
stoopkid13 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
rustyburger2 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Hoping to get some help cutting down this bid list.

3.0x GPA, so I am obviously worried about striking out. I'm Asian American (not sure if URM for biglaw purposes?) and have some irrelevant WE. Everything is NYC.


Bro, this bid list is terrifying to look at. Like, this bid list could totally screw you. It's WAY too tight. Why is Ropes and Gray bid at 7 when the FFB last year is 6? Unless the firm now has more interview slots than it did last year, a firm will never go down on the FFB list.

You need at least 3 spaces between the FFB and your bid. If I were you, I'd aim for 4 or 5 spaces. Your number one priority should be getting as many interviews as possible. You should go through the data and see what firms have the highest screener to callback ratios, and callback to offer ratios. Use that as a way to narrow down your list.


I would start but cutting Weil and Ropes. That would give your FFB some breathing room, and those firms are unlikely to offer a CB to someone with your grades regardless (no offense).



Rustyburger and jbagel, thanks for the feedback! I agree it's definitely too tight and I needed help picking the right firms to remove. I'll start with Weil and Ropes. Should I cut Sidley as well? They gave 63% of their offers last year to non-stone or transfer students, but they are also ranked so high on Vault that I imagine most of those offers were to median and above grades (as mentioned, I'm 3.0x). That would also move up my entire list.


Sidley's more realistic than Weil or Ropes. If you have a good reason for keeping the firm, I'd consider it a reach and leave it. I'd also cut Jones Day though.

FWIW, Sidley was one of the firms that asked Petal to call all offer recipients because their yield was way lower than what they expected. Personally, I wouldn't read too much into it, but some posters seem to think those firms will make more offers this year around.


So far I've seen that Sidley and PW made those calls. What other firms did that?


Latham and Weil have in the past two years also.

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:32 pm

.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:51 pm

What does "allows multiple interviews" mean on the spreadsheet. At first I thought it meant if a firm has a DC and NY office you can bid to both, but now I see even firms with only one bidding office are checked as "allowing multiple interviews".

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:00 am

Need some advice on a bid list

Transferring into CLS from T40 w/ ~3.7 GPA, no news on LR/journal yet, non-URM, 4 years work experience. Looking at NY, TX (have ties) & LA (no ties) mostly for corporate but also included some lit options.

Any help would be massively appreciated!

1 White & Case – NY (5)
2 Morrison & Foerster – NY (5)
3 Milbank Tweed – NY (6)
4 Paul Weiss – NY (9)
5 Skadden – NY (10)
6 Davis Polk – NY (11)
7 Latham & Watkins – NY (13)
8 Sullivan & Cromwell - NY (10)
9 Akin Gump – NY (11)
10 Cravath – NY (14)
11 Covington - NY (16)
12 Simpson Thacher – NY (22)
13 King & Spalding – NY (15)
14 Arnold & Porter – NY (26)
15 Gibson Dunn – Dallas (30)
16 Vinson & Elkins – Houston (no failed bid for the rest)
17 Baker Botts - Houston
18 Baker & McKenzie - Houston
19 Jones Day - Houston
20 Kirkland & Ellis - NY
21 Akin Gump - LA
22 Foley & Lardner - LA
23 Kirkland & Ellis - LA
24 Baker & Hostetler - Houston
25 Hunton & Williams - Houston
26 King & Spalding - Houston
27 Willkie Farr - Houston
28 Haynes & Boone - Houston
29 Norton Rose Fulbright - Houston
30 DLA Piper - LA

Thanks!

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:10 pm

^ bump

FascinatedWanderer
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:12 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby FascinatedWanderer » Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:27 pm

The top part of the bidlist might be a little bit tight. You could maybe fix this by losing SullCrom which is a longshot with a 3.7 transfer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:35 pm

Thanks!

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:02 am

Does anyone know when we get our interview schedules?

Also, is there anything important or useful that people usually do the weekend before EIP? Any good events, mock interviews, etc? Trying to figure out my travel plans.

FascinatedWanderer
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:12 pm

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby FascinatedWanderer » Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:41 am

I would just relax. I was just hanging out with friends/doing normal summer things that weekend. Unless you're a horribly awkward interviewer (which, frankly, many at CLS are) there's very little to be done as far as preparation.

IME, screeners give very few fucks if you know the firms marquee practice areas or some such bullshit. They just want to have a chill convo with you for a while to get relief from all the assholes they had to put up with for the whole day. Except for SullCrom. You can say 0 words in that screener if the number on the page is high enough.

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:49 am

Anonymous User wrote:Need some advice on a bid list

Transferring into CLS from T40 w/ ~3.7 GPA, no news on LR/journal yet, non-URM, 4 years work experience. Looking at NY, TX (have ties) & LA (no ties) mostly for corporate but also included some lit options.

Any help would be massively appreciated!

1 White & Case – NY (5)
2 Morrison & Foerster – NY (5)
3 Milbank Tweed – NY (6)
4 Paul Weiss – NY (9)
5 Skadden – NY (10)
6 Davis Polk – NY (11)
7 Latham & Watkins – NY (13)
8 Sullivan & Cromwell - NY (10)
9 Akin Gump – NY (11)
10 Cravath – NY (14)
11 Covington - NY (16)
12 Simpson Thacher – NY (22)
13 King & Spalding – NY (15)
14 Arnold & Porter – NY (26)
15 Gibson Dunn – Dallas (30)
16 Vinson & Elkins – Houston (no failed bid for the rest)
17 Baker Botts - Houston
18 Baker & McKenzie - Houston
19 Jones Day - Houston
20 Kirkland & Ellis - NY
21 Akin Gump - LA
22 Foley & Lardner - LA
23 Kirkland & Ellis - LA
24 Baker & Hostetler - Houston
25 Hunton & Williams - Houston
26 King & Spalding - Houston
27 Willkie Farr - Houston
28 Haynes & Boone - Houston
29 Norton Rose Fulbright - Houston
30 DLA Piper - LA

Thanks!

Looks like you have the wrong FFB for Cravath .

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:16 am

Good catch, thanks!

Anonymous User
Posts: 287553
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia EIP 2017

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Jul 20, 2017 1:09 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Need some advice on a bid list

Transferring into CLS from T40 w/ ~3.7 GPA, no news on LR/journal yet, non-URM, 4 years work experience. Looking at NY, TX (have ties) & LA (no ties) mostly for corporate but also included some lit options.

Any help would be massively appreciated!

1 White & Case – NY (5)
2 Morrison & Foerster – NY (5)
3 Milbank Tweed – NY (6)
4 Paul Weiss – NY (9)
5 Skadden – NY (10)
6 Davis Polk – NY (11)
7 Latham & Watkins – NY (13)
8 Sullivan & Cromwell - NY (10)
9 Akin Gump – NY (11)
10 Cravath – NY (14)
11 Covington - NY (16)
12 Simpson Thacher – NY (22)
13 King & Spalding – NY (15)
14 Arnold & Porter – NY (26)
15 Gibson Dunn – Dallas (30)
16 Vinson & Elkins – Houston (no failed bid for the rest)
17 Baker Botts - Houston
18 Baker & McKenzie - Houston
19 Jones Day - Houston
20 Kirkland & Ellis - NY
21 Akin Gump - LA
22 Foley & Lardner - LA
23 Kirkland & Ellis - LA
24 Baker & Hostetler - Houston
25 Hunton & Williams - Houston
26 King & Spalding - Houston
27 Willkie Farr - Houston
28 Haynes & Boone - Houston
29 Norton Rose Fulbright - Houston
30 DLA Piper - LA

Thanks!


I'd consider dropping some of the 16-30 from the bid list and using some of those bids to shoot for additional firms with FFB requirements. If the dropped firms have open interview slots you can manually add them after the interviews are announced. I also think the no FFB for Kirkland was a freak occurrence and should not be relied on (I'd at a minimum put it 16).

Also double check you can bid on multiple offices for those firms that are listed more than once (Akin, King).




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.