Now it just seems like you're trolling: I'd hope that someone who's sincere would at least recognize that simultaneously holding two nominally full time jobs with two different employers isn't something that people generally do (at least if they don't need to).ihadadream wrote:Are you saying they would have to pay me overtime? I know know labor law.A. Nony Mouse wrote:You don't see anything wrong with holding two 40-hour jobs at the same time?ihadadream wrote:Thanks for the information.
For what it's worth, I don't see anything wrong with it.
Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- mjb447
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am
Re: Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts
Also, wage and hour laws are really an employment issue, not a labor (i.e. union) issue. But you probably know know that.ihadadream wrote:Are you saying they would have to pay me overtime? I know know labor law.A. Nony Mouse wrote:You don't see anything wrong with holding two 40-hour jobs at the same time?ihadadream wrote:Thanks for the information.
For what it's worth, I don't see anything wrong with it.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:13 am
Re: Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts
I've never taken employment or labor law, so I don't know under which category wage-and-hour laws like the FLSA fall. I would imagine, however, that law clerks fall under the "learned professional" exemption and, hence, are ineligible for overtime.
I found out that the federal gov't prohibits people with multiple appointments from working more than forty hours a week total.
Logistically, it could be done though (especially where one employer allows telecommuting), and I certainly have the drive.
Thanks for the info.
I found out that the federal gov't prohibits people with multiple appointments from working more than forty hours a week total.
Logistically, it could be done though (especially where one employer allows telecommuting), and I certainly have the drive.
Thanks for the info.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts
Logistically it would be horrifically bad and stupid to attempt. Two jobs, sure, but not when they're both 40 hours a week.
- mjb447
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am
Re: Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts
At least! Staff attorneys often have more flexibility than chambers clerks, but it's entirely possible that one or both of the judges would regularly ask for work that would put OP over 40.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Logistically it would be horrifically bad and stupid to attempt. Two jobs, sure, but not when they're both 40 hours a week.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: Concurrent employment for two judges on different courts
This sounds like a fantastic way to piss off two judges at once. If that's your goal, by all means.