LA Lit boutiques

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
bruinfan10

Silver
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am

Re: LA Lit boutiques

Postby bruinfan10 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:48 pm

lolwat wrote:
Agreed. There's always a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem with this assessment, as those firms are the most selective and therefore hire the most qualified applicants. If you took the typical hire at one of those firms and put them instead at Latham/Gibson/wherever, perhaps their ausa chances would be just as good. I suspect not, though. I think the opportunities afforded by those boutiques (and, perhaps just as importantly, the reputation of those boutiques as places that provide such opportunities) is a significant factor.


The opportunities (or at least the reputation for those opportunities) are often much better at boutiques. But I always heard/thought that AUSA (and similar) jobs come in at least some (if not large) part due to connections. Which is why firms like MTO and Gibson places really well. It's also more difficult to say how well somewhere like Susman places because I honestly haven't seen anyone actually leave the LA office yet... It wasn't a big office to begin with (maybe 10 attorneys several years back and 15 now?) and it seems like everyone who was there when I looked at the firm back in 2012 or so is still there.

As an aside, I don't really know why people consider AUSA jobs "unicorn" jobs across the board. I guess it depends what people are looking for.

i actually pretty clearly called out cdcal and ndcal ausa jobs as "unicorn" jobs. those offices are SO competitive, i think they make becoming a law professor look easy. i've also worked for a fed defender in a small town in the midwest. ausa jobs in that district weren't in the "unicorn" category. but becoming an ausa in san francisco? holy sh*t that's hard. but yeah i'm with you, not my cup of tea either.

lolwat

Silver
Posts: 1216
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:30 pm

Re: LA Lit boutiques

Postby lolwat » Thu Apr 13, 2017 1:01 pm

bruinfan10 wrote:i actually pretty clearly called out cdcal and ndcal ausa jobs as "unicorn" jobs. those offices are SO competitive, i think they make becoming a law professor look easy. i've also worked for a fed defender in a small town in the midwest. ausa jobs in that district weren't in the "unicorn" category. but becoming an ausa in san francisco? holy sh*t that's hard. but yeah i'm with you, not my cup of tea either.


Yeah, I was speaking more generally, not specific to you.

I haven't been around TLS enough to understand the definition of a unicorn job. I'm genuinely curious what it means to people. Is it just really ultra-competitive jobs that people generally seem to aspire to?



Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.