Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=270921
newlawgrad wrote:Can any of you who have recently started (i.e. those posting saying they would be going to AUSA before 2/22) confirm any of the most recent posts--that hiring will be down or non-existent in 2017 as the offices await a new budget effective in 2018? I know incoming line attorneys likely won't have too much of an ability to gain insight or confirm this, but to whatever degree possible.
FTC?Anonymous User wrote:3L who received an official offer from an independent agency in December. At the end of last week, I received confirmation that the agency can move forward with my offer.
I think it's probably a much worse sign for non-AUSA components like ENRD and tax and so on. My understanding is that the new AG is making violent crime (which will probably include drug crime) a priority, so while budget cuts are always bad, I don't think the USAOs are going to be the primary victims.JakeTappers wrote:Anyone looked at the DOJ proposed budget? Know it is likely a work in progress, and that even republicans are rebuffing it, but a 3.8% decrease and a focus on immigration judges and border control makes me think it's a bad sign for AUSAs for sure, especially outside border districts.
JakeTappers wrote:Anyone looked at the DOJ proposed budget? Know it is likely a work in progress, and that even republicans are rebuffing it, but a 3.8% decrease and a focus on immigration judges and border control makes me think it's a bad sign for AUSAs for sure, especially outside border districts.
? Is this really the case? have known people to get hired under acting AUSAs.Anonymous User wrote:JakeTappers wrote:Anyone looked at the DOJ proposed budget? Know it is likely a work in progress, and that even republicans are rebuffing it, but a 3.8% decrease and a focus on immigration judges and border control makes me think it's a bad sign for AUSAs for sure, especially outside border districts.
The bigger issue for AUSA hiring is going to be the lack of confirmed US Attorneys. The acting USA doesn't have hiring power or firing powers. I'm not sure if the interim one does. And I don't think we'll even see a nominee for a spot until the fall at the earliest.
That's what I was told when my USA stepped down.Anonymous User wrote:? Is this really the case? have known people to get hired under acting AUSAs.Anonymous User wrote:JakeTappers wrote:Anyone looked at the DOJ proposed budget? Know it is likely a work in progress, and that even republicans are rebuffing it, but a 3.8% decrease and a focus on immigration judges and border control makes me think it's a bad sign for AUSAs for sure, especially outside border districts.
The bigger issue for AUSA hiring is going to be the lack of confirmed US Attorneys. The acting USA doesn't have hiring power or firing powers. I'm not sure if the interim one does. And I don't think we'll even see a nominee for a spot until the fall at the earliest.
Next year or right now? Presumably next year, around January, everyone would be looking to hire.Anonymous User wrote:^...Of course I chose to clerk the one year there will apparently be no hiring whatsoever for the one job that was the reason I clerked.
I think this is largely true, but was told by a former acting USA that this is not universal. This will be particularly true in border districts and maybe even other high profile locations if there is any delay in appointment due to the increases necessary for policy implementation. For example, I'm told several border districts will receive increases of up to 20% to double its immigration enforcement.Anonymous User wrote:? Is this really the case? have known people to get hired under acting AUSAs.Anonymous User wrote:JakeTappers wrote:Anyone looked at the DOJ proposed budget? Know it is likely a work in progress, and that even republicans are rebuffing it, but a 3.8% decrease and a focus on immigration judges and border control makes me think it's a bad sign for AUSAs for sure, especially outside border districts.
The bigger issue for AUSA hiring is going to be the lack of confirmed US Attorneys. The acting USA doesn't have hiring power or firing powers. I'm not sure if the interim one does. And I don't think we'll even see a nominee for a spot until the fall at the earliest.
I would normally be applying now. Timed it perfectly wrong. Just frustrating because it's really my own fault. Should've known it'd be a bad idea to clerk during/after an election year.JakeTappers wrote:Next year or right now? Presumably next year, around January, everyone would be looking to hire.Anonymous User wrote:^...Of course I chose to clerk the one year there will apparently be no hiring whatsoever for the one job that was the reason I clerked.
A couple weeks after my first round of interviews with EPA, they emailed to say that all interviews were being put on hold (indefinitely) because they were affected by the hiring freeze. They only started looking at Honors Attorney applications in February after the freeze went into effect though.Anonymous User wrote:Was interviewed for an EPA Honors position this week. I think the honors programs all applied for exemptions and I think because the honors positions are limited in term length the money is already put aside for them, so it's different than other hiring.
Pre-freeze lateral offer to the Criminal Division of the DOJ, but the offer is contingent on the background check, so no start date yet. Not a shocker, but my slot was exempted from the freeze. I got the news in a voicemail from HR, so I was unable to inquire as to how broad that exemption is.Anonymous User wrote:I spoke to HUD about this (interviewing soon) and they basically said "bring it up in the interview." However, folks in my career office have said that they moved their entire hiring schedule up to avoid potential issues with the freeze. That's somewhat encouraging.Anonymous User wrote:Yeah, exactly. Perhaps, if someone discusses this with an agency (whether a hiring freeze could affect offers already extended), they could post the agency's response?Anonymous User wrote:FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:Srsly don't worry. a) it's trump and b) if you already have an offer from big gov you'll land your feet somewhere else
The problem here is that many of us will effectively be turning down other offers for fed employment. To the extent we're able to, we have to make sure we won't be screwed.
No word on other agencies I applied to, but I'm planning to ask everyone. I strongly encourage people to share information here. This is a big deal for a LOT of people.
Same. I'm really curious as to how long the background check/clearance is going to take. I completed my SF-86 during the freeze. It doesn't sound like any of my references or employer have been contacted since the exemption came through.Anonymous User wrote:Pre-freeze lateral offer to the Criminal Division of the DOJ, but the offer is contingent on the background check, so no start date yet. Not a shocker, but my slot was exempted from the freeze. I got the news in a voicemail from HR, so I was unable to inquire as to how broad that exemption is.
OP: Mine just started last Thursday. I got an email requesting permission to speak with my current supervisor, who was then contacted. I got my SF-86 in to them just before the freeze.Anonymous User wrote:Same. I'm really curious as to how long the background check/clearance is going to take. I completed my SF-86 during the freeze. It doesn't sound like any of my references or employer have been contacted since the exemption came through.Anonymous User wrote:Pre-freeze lateral offer to the Criminal Division of the DOJ, but the offer is contingent on the background check, so no start date yet. Not a shocker, but my slot was exempted from the freeze. I got the news in a voicemail from HR, so I was unable to inquire as to how broad that exemption is.
Gracias.Anonymous User wrote:OP: Mine just started last Thursday. I got an email requesting permission to speak with my current supervisor, who was then contacted. I got my SF-86 in to them just before the freeze.Anonymous User wrote:Same. I'm really curious as to how long the background check/clearance is going to take. I completed my SF-86 during the freeze. It doesn't sound like any of my references or employer have been contacted since the exemption came through.Anonymous User wrote:Pre-freeze lateral offer to the Criminal Division of the DOJ, but the offer is contingent on the background check, so no start date yet. Not a shocker, but my slot was exempted from the freeze. I got the news in a voicemail from HR, so I was unable to inquire as to how broad that exemption is.