On Leaving Litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
On Leaving Litigation
I recently left a commercial litigation position for a transactional (media/entertainment) practice. While there are a lot of things I like, I don't always feel like I'm being as intellectually stimulated as I was as a litigator. That feeling when you've delved deep into a research question or drafted a really complex brief is somewhat lost to me now. Has anyone gone through the same thing? Do you find that you're consistently missing being a litigator / the stimulation that comes with it?
- daedalus2309
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:15 pm
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
If you liked that feeling, why did you leave litigation?Anonymous User wrote:I recently left a commercial litigation position for a transactional (media/entertainment) practice. While there are a lot of things I like, I don't always feel like I'm being as intellectually stimulated as I was as a litigator. That feeling when you've delved deep into a research question or drafted a really complex brief is somewhat lost to me now. Has anyone gone through the same thing? Do you find that you're consistently missing being a litigator / the stimulation that comes with it?
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
I am going through the same situation. I left mid law litigation position to go to big law white collar investigations practice. Feeing like I went from lawyer to secretary.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
How did you manage to do this? I am trying to do the exact same thing but am running into the dual trap of (1) not having enough experience -- the closest I've been able to get is soft IP litigation -- and (2) being "too senior" to get hired for a more entry-level position where I could actually get that experience, even though I seriously don't care about the pay or seniority cut. I'm at wit's end and basically don't see a path forward other than networking hard and hoping for a lucky break through nepotism.Anonymous User wrote:I recently left a commercial litigation position for a transactional (media/entertainment) practice.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
I would love to as well but there seems to be a stigma surrounding leaving lit for transactions--like you couldn't hack it in litigation so want to try something else.cavalierattitude wrote:How did you manage to do this? I am trying to do the exact same thing but am running into the dual trap of (1) not having enough experience -- the closest I've been able to get is soft IP litigation -- and (2) being "too senior" to get hired for a more entry-level position where I could actually get that experience, even though I seriously don't care about the pay or seniority cut. I'm at wit's end and basically don't see a path forward other than networking hard and hoping for a lucky break through nepotism.Anonymous User wrote:I recently left a commercial litigation position for a transactional (media/entertainment) practice.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
I would love to as well but there seems to be a stigma surrounding leaving lit for transactions--like you couldn't hack it in litigation so want to try something else.cavalierattitude wrote:How did you manage to do this? I am trying to do the exact same thing but am running into the dual trap of (1) not having enough experience -- the closest I've been able to get is soft IP litigation -- and (2) being "too senior" to get hired for a more entry-level position where I could actually get that experience, even though I seriously don't care about the pay or seniority cut. I'm at wit's end and basically don't see a path forward other than networking hard and hoping for a lucky break through nepotism.Anonymous User wrote:I recently left a commercial litigation position for a transactional (media/entertainment) practice.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
You would think that would be belied by the fact that I've done litigation for years at top firms. I very clearly can hack it; I just don't want to, because I hate it. It just took me too long to realize how much I hate it.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
I hope it didn't come across as my viewpoint that you can't hack it. It's just what I've experienced while trying to make this move. It feels impossible.cavalierattitude wrote:You would think that would be belied by the fact that I've done litigation for years at top firms. I very clearly can hack it; I just don't want to, because I hate it. It just took me too long to realize how much I hate it.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
Nah, I understood you were saying that seems to be the view of people in the hiring position. I was likewise addressing my comment to them/generally, and not at you.
It really does feel impossible. I've even applied to paralegal positions, which is depressing in itself and then more depressing when even those don't get a response. Meanwhile I keep hearing stories of people who've made it happen. Plus I feel like a brat for being so dissatisfied when plenty of people work shitty jobs for far less money.
It really does feel impossible. I've even applied to paralegal positions, which is depressing in itself and then more depressing when even those don't get a response. Meanwhile I keep hearing stories of people who've made it happen. Plus I feel like a brat for being so dissatisfied when plenty of people work shitty jobs for far less money.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
FWIW...I have a friend who went to HYS and worked in a V25 firm for a couple years before lateraling to a v50ish. It took her a year or so of looking but she landed a gig at a small firm doing only corporate work. The pay cut was intense but it can be done if you're willing to make some huge sacrifices (likely prestige and financial). The shitty thing is that people seem to be able to make a switch from corporate to litigation without as much difficulty. I feel like as litigation associates we have more transferrable skills when looking to move to the corporate side than corporate associates have when looking to do lit. Just keep looking and maybe take opportunities to do transactional pro bono work that way you can market yourself as having certain skills notwithstanding the fact that you're technically a litigation associate.cavalierattitude wrote:Nah, I understood you were saying that seems to be the view of people in the hiring position. I was likewise addressing my comment to them/generally, and not at you.
It really does feel impossible. I've even applied to paralegal positions, which is depressing in itself and then more depressing when even those don't get a response. Meanwhile I keep hearing stories of people who've made it happen. Plus I feel like a brat for being so dissatisfied when plenty of people work shitty jobs for far less money.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
Yup, sounds familiar. I went top school > clerkship > V10 > V75 (stupid move in hindsight for other reasons, not recommended), been looking for over two years but found only one small firm willing to interview me for transactional work, and they said no thanks at least in part because they preferred to hire someone more junior. Have had a few in-house interviews as well, but nobody will bite. I don't care about prestige and am perfectly happy to take up to a 60% pay cut. Maybe even more for the right job. Money isn't that important; I just want to do the work and get the experience.
Do you have any resources that you or people you know have actually gotten transactional pro bono work through? I've heard that suggestion before but have never actually encountered any. It all seems to be litigation (asylum proceedings, etc.).
Do you have any resources that you or people you know have actually gotten transactional pro bono work through? I've heard that suggestion before but have never actually encountered any. It all seems to be litigation (asylum proceedings, etc.).
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
My firm has someone in charge of pro bono. Do you have an in-firm resource to go to for pro bono work?cavalierattitude wrote:Yup, sounds familiar. I went top school > clerkship > V10 > V75 (stupid move in hindsight for other reasons, not recommended), been looking for over two years but found only one small firm willing to interview me for transactional work, and they said no thanks at least in part because they preferred to hire someone more junior. Have had a few in-house interviews as well, but nobody will bite. I don't care about prestige and am perfectly happy to take up to a 60% pay cut. Maybe even more for the right job. Money isn't that important; I just want to do the work and get the experience.
Do you have any resources that you or people you know have actually gotten transactional pro bono work through? I've heard that suggestion before but have never actually encountered any. It all seems to be litigation (asylum proceedings, etc.).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
Yes. They're not that helpful.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
I say just keep trying and hopefully something will pan out. Are you working with a recruiter?cavalierattitude wrote:Yes. They're not that helpful.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 10:33 pm
Re: On Leaving Litigation
A couple. Others have flat out said it's going to be too difficult in my position. Most of the leads I've had haven't been through recruiters.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
I think a recruiter might be good for identifying open positions at firms and selling you to his/her contacts within firms. I think with in-house roles, you're basically on your own or you have to know someone on the inside.cavalierattitude wrote:A couple. Others have flat out said it's going to be too difficult in my position. Most of the leads I've had haven't been through recruiters.
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: On Leaving Litigation
Yes, I think that's the conventional wisdom and is generally in line with my experience over the past few years.Anonymous User wrote:I think a recruiter might be good for identifying open positions at firms and selling you to his/her contacts within firms. I think with in-house roles, you're basically on your own or you have to know someone on the inside.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login