NY: Kirkland vs. Gibson Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
NY: Kirkland vs. Gibson
Interested in litigation. I would like to work at a firm which gives substantive experience and takes cases to trial. Kirkland seems to have great training opportunities for young lit associates as part of their summer program. I know Gibson is well known for its appellate work, but that is mainly out of its DC office but they are also Band 1 for General Commercial Lit in NY. From CB's and firm events, I liked the people at Gibson more than those at Kirkland. I don't have any strong preference for any area of lit at this point but I do have a science background so IP work is something I am looking into/interested in.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY: Kirkland vs. Gibson
If you liked the people at Gibson the most, go with Gibson--seriously. You cannot go wrong with Gibson.
-
jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: NY: Kirkland vs. Gibson
For lit, Gibson all the way. For transactional I'd probably say the opposite.
