DF Thread Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: V42 IP litigator taking Q and challenges

Post by rpupkin » Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Challenge - find a senior associate you work with whose address you know or who is going on a business trip where you know their hotel/room.

Get an escort to come out to said location. Have her (or him!) say that "[partner you work under] says to have a good time."
That's an expensive challenge.

It also makes no sense. Why would DF give the partner credit for doing an expensive favor for his associate bro?

Also, this post shouldn't be anon.

You should drop out of TLS.

Aureusmons

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:29 am

Re: V42 IP litigator taking Q and challenges

Post by Aureusmons » Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:39 am

rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Challenge - find a senior associate you work with whose address you know or who is going on a business trip where you know their hotel/room.

Get an escort to come out to said location. Have her (or him!) say that "[partner you work under] says to have a good time."
That's an expensive challenge.

It also makes no sense. Why would DF give the partner credit for doing an expensive favor for his associate bro?

Also, this post shouldn't be anon.

You should drop out of TLS.
If you see a comment that you believe is misuse or abuse of the anon feature, please report it using the Report button on the lower-right corner of each post. This button, which appears as a red exclamation point, allows you to flag a post for moderator investigation.

Moderators may announce when they have taken action against a poster, but this is only for transparency, not to invite debate about the anon policy. Do NOT post in the thread itself about whether or not something violates the anon abuse policy; this is considered thread derailment and may get you banned as well. There are other places you can do this, such as PM or an appropriate Lounge thread such as this one: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=146657

User avatar
xael

Platinum
Posts: 7548
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:18 pm

Re: V42 IP litigator taking Q and challenges

Post by xael » Wed Jul 15, 2015 10:46 am

Aureusmons wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Challenge - find a senior associate you work with whose address you know or who is going on a business trip where you know their hotel/room.

Get an escort to come out to said location. Have her (or him!) say that "[partner you work under] says to have a good time."
That's an expensive challenge.

It also makes no sense. Why would DF give the partner credit for doing an expensive favor for his associate bro?

Also, this post shouldn't be anon.

You should drop out of TLS.
If you see a comment that you believe is misuse or abuse of the anon feature, please report it using the Report button on the lower-right corner of each post. This button, which appears as a red exclamation point, allows you to flag a post for moderator investigation.

Moderators may announce when they have taken action against a poster, but this is only for transparency, not to invite debate about the anon policy. Do NOT post in the thread itself about whether or not something violates the anon abuse policy; this is considered thread derailment and may get you banned as well. There are other places you can do this, such as PM or an appropriate Lounge thread such as this one: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=146657
:lol:

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”