. Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
OutoftheWoods
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 1:49 pm
Re: Please critique my NYU bidlist! 3.6+
I would take out Schulte if you just want lit because they're basically only good for finance/banking. Then I would take out Bickel & Brewer (it's either them or wachtell that are too unrealistic, but since you have a connection at wachtell, it's bickel & brewer that's out).
As for the other firms you listed, Chadbourne is not great at lit (just finance really, i think their motto is "lawyers focused on finance"). I think your list (with changes above) is pretty damn good with 3.6+. Do average on interviews and you should be OK.
As for the other firms you listed, Chadbourne is not great at lit (just finance really, i think their motto is "lawyers focused on finance"). I think your list (with changes above) is pretty damn good with 3.6+. Do average on interviews and you should be OK.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
