Page 1 of 3

VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:52 pm
by NDOMUKONGGGG
Who knows when they're coming out? Last year looks like it was June 18...

Guesses for any big moves this year?

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:54 pm
by smaug
i expect kirkland to shatter the rankings

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:45 pm
by lhanvt13

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:51 pm
by minnbills
Of all the rankings people care about this has to be the dumbest

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:08 pm
by rahulg91
minnbills wrote:Of all the rankings people care about this has to be the dumbest
And yet people (some of your peers) will likely care about them. Always been confused as to why whenever there's a discussion on Vault someone has to chime in on why Vault is terrible. It's subjective, it's only relevant to a small subset of biglaw. We get it, you're past petty things like rankings and prestige. The methodology is well known now, posting about how much they suck is silly.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:18 pm
by rpupkin
rahulg91 wrote:
minnbills wrote:Of all the rankings people care about this has to be the dumbest
And yet people (some of your peers) will likely care about them. Always been confused as to why whenever there's a discussion on Vault someone has to chime in on why Vault is terrible. It's subjective, it's only relevant to a small subset of biglaw. We get it, you're past petty things like rankings and prestige. The methodology is well known now, posting about how much they suck is silly.
You suck.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:28 pm
by 071816
i would expect Quinn to remain

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:41 pm
by Big Shrimpin
can't wait to see how much more or less PREFTIGIOUS i have to call myself this year

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:38 am
by Anonymous User
It's sad that I'm so excited for these rankings. I'm sick.

Prediction: no big movement in the V15.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:23 pm
by Anonymous User

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:25 pm
by 071816
as I predicted, Quinn remained.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:26 pm
by chuckbass
K&E shattering the rankings

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:28 pm
by TLSModBot
Well that was anticlimactic.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:30 pm
by bearsfan23
Wow, K&E is now a V7. It must be the brownies

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:33 pm
by DCNTUA
Steptoe only offered to 9 out of 13 people last year :|

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:00 pm
by smaug
Jason Taverner wrote:i expect kirkland to shatter the rankings
chimp wrote:i would expect Quinn to remain
clearly chimp and I are the ones who know what's happening on these fora

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 5:12 pm
by 071816
Jason Taverner wrote:
Jason Taverner wrote:i expect kirkland to shatter the rankings
chimp wrote:i would expect Quinn to remain
clearly chimp and I are the ones who know what's happening on these fora
as the (sometimes) proud owner of these fora, I feel that I am at least somewhat obligated to keep myself educated on whether or not Quinn is likely to remain.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 5:43 pm
by desespere
Holy crap. K&E no-offered twenty people! What's up with that? Is no one safe?

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:27 pm
by ProfBono
desespere wrote:Holy crap. K&E no-offered twenty people! What's up with that? Is no one safe?
Everyone else in the top 10 gave 100% return offers, what's Kirkland's deal?

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:30 pm
by smaug
was discussed elsewhere, but those numbers are likely inaccurate

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:33 pm
by ProfBono
Jason Taverner wrote:was discussed elsewhere, but those numbers are likely inaccurate
As in they didn't no offer 20 people? They no offered less people? They no offered more people? They gave everyone return offers? What accounts for the inaccuracy? (Don't mean to bombard, just curious)

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:35 pm
by smaug
chill

they probably used the data that showed that 21 people didn't return or something (i forgot, check nalp)

i think the nalp report shows that they didn't no offer anyone

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:41 pm
by Anonymous User
K&E had 100% offer rates in NY and Chicago. Really doubt they no offered the entire SF class, so it's probably a returning summer stat.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:44 pm
by ProfBono
Anonymous User wrote:K&E had 100% offer rates in NY and Chicago. Really doubt they no offered the entire SF class, so it's probably a returning summer stat.
Yeah, I just checked NALP too, you're most likely right. Are Vault stats really that unreliable? Woof.

Re: VAULT 2016 rankings

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:50 pm
by Iwanttolawschool
Is there a place to find GPA cut-offs for these firms for each school?