rpupkin wrote:ForgotMyPassword wrote:I disagree with you on this issue, but that doesn't mean I'm going to attack your character so as to shield myself from the possibility that a reasonable person may have a different opinion than me. The response you've generated is characteristic of the social orthodoxy being pushed by ENEMIES OF THE GATE's, ostracization under the guise of inclusion.
Who attacked the poster's character? And how was anyone prevented from expressing an opinion? Also, what is the "social orthodoxy" being pushed here?
You know when those pesky gays want to enjoy private intimate relationships and have access to basic civil rights, how that's imposing a liberal "social orthodoxy" on all those good folks who just want to be left alone but still prevent others from their pursuit of happiness? I think that's the gist of it.