has anyone linked to that video yet? im poasting on phone and too lazyCicero76 wrote:On balance, I'd say the perspectives in this thread seem in balance.
im a midlevel and i def like the work/job, just dislike workaholics
has anyone linked to that video yet? im poasting on phone and too lazyCicero76 wrote:On balance, I'd say the perspectives in this thread seem in balance.
thank you for thiswildhaggis wrote:OK, just read through the entire thread and, while this issue may have been put to rest, I have to comment on it.
I read through several posts debating whether 100+ hours is "expected" in biglaw or not, and some dude pushing all the blame for such hours on OP because his V10 told him that average billables were less than 2100 during a record year. "That's only 45- to 55- hour weeks!" "2800 hours is barely 48 60-hour weeks!"
This is complete fucking bullshit.
Even if 100+ hours is not expected, and even if 2000 is a typical billing average, this has nothing to do with how those hours were spent and paints nothing resembling an accurate picture of what a 2000-hour, 2500-hour, or even 1900-hour year may look like. That KidStuddi suggests a 2800-hour year is "barely" 48 60-hour weeks ("Look, you even have a bunch of time for vacation!"), or that a 2100-hour year is consistently working 45-55 hours a week, makes me genuinely question whether he is flame or not.
Let's take a look at why this is the case. I'll use an example that is illustrative of how biglaw corp works: I just finish up a pretty busy 200-hour month. I'm lagging a bit on my hours because last month was slow, but I'm confident I can catch up. I come in to work and the other matters I'm staffed on are pencils down or in some kind of a lull. I do some small post-closing things and ask around for work. No one has anything at the moment, so I work on this or that until 6pm, not having much to do. I've billed about 2.5 hours. I tool around a bit and decide to leave early at 7pm. Partner A sends me an e-mail at 8:30pm saying he needs some such fucking thing ASAP. I work for 4 hours, send it to him. He sends back comments. Why the fuck is he still awake. I take another hour to work in his comments, send it back to him. It's now after 2am, and I've billed approximately 7.5 hours that day.
I come in the next day, tired, still not much to do. I ask around for work again... Nothing. Partner A gets back to me on the document from the night before at 5:30pm. He spoke to the client and needs me to turn a bunch of changes. I work until 10:30pm, send it to him, go home because I'm pissed. I've billed 5 hours that day. It is now Wednesday and I'm on pace for a 30-hour week, maybe. If it keeps up, I'm on pace for a 120-hour month, or so. The truth is I don't feel like I just worked a 7.5- or 5-hour day. I feel like I just worked two 16-hour days, and I'm exhausted. My time not working those days was spent trying to get work, or twiddling my thumbs wondering why I wasn't getting work, or whether I'm too slow. Anxiety at my ability to catch up on my hours begins to creep in as my satisfaction of a completed 200-hour month fades away. I realize it's going to be one of "those" months, where I bill 130-140 hours, which makes me look slow, but really I billed hours all over the board, barely got sleep, and checked my phone every 2 minutes.
Fast-forward to next month. I did, in fact, only bill about 130 hours. But, hey, several new M&A deals are on their way down the pipeline, and they all have massive data rooms and maybe one is a contribution so that means double the fucking drafting, so no worries about hours anymore, right? It's about to be a 250-hour month. But didn't you just have a 140-hour month? You surely used the slowdown to catch up on sleep and chill, right?
I mean, shit, isn't 140 hours, like, only 6 hours per day anyway?
this is so sad and so truewildhaggis wrote:OK, just read through the entire thread and, while this issue may have been put to rest, I have to comment on it.
I read through several posts debating whether 100+ hours is "expected" in biglaw or not, and some dude pushing all the blame for such hours on OP because his V10 told him that average billables were less than 2100 during a record year. "That's only 45- to 55- hour weeks!" "2800 hours is barely 48 60-hour weeks!"
This is complete fucking bullshit.
Even if 100+ hours is not expected, and even if 2000 is a typical billing average, this has nothing to do with how those hours were spent and paints nothing resembling an accurate picture of what a 2000-hour, 2500-hour, or even 1900-hour year may look like. That KidStuddi suggests a 2800-hour year is "barely" 48 60-hour weeks ("Look, you even have a bunch of time for vacation!"), or that a 2100-hour year is consistently working 45-55 hours a week, makes me genuinely question whether he is flame or not.
Let's take a look at why this is the case. I'll use an example that is illustrative of how biglaw corp works: I just finish up a pretty busy 200-hour month. I'm lagging a bit on my hours because last month was slow, but I'm confident I can catch up. I come in to work and the other matters I'm staffed on are pencils down or in some kind of a lull. I do some small post-closing things and ask around for work. No one has anything at the moment, so I work on this or that until 6pm, not having much to do. I've billed about 2.5 hours. I tool around a bit and decide to leave early at 7pm. Partner A sends me an e-mail at 8:30pm saying he needs some such fucking thing ASAP. I work for 4 hours, send it to him. He sends back comments. Why the fuck is he still awake. I take another hour to work in his comments, send it back to him. It's now after 2am, and I've billed approximately 7.5 hours that day.
I come in the next day, tired, still not much to do. I ask around for work again... Nothing. Partner A gets back to me on the document from the night before at 5:30pm. He spoke to the client and needs me to turn a bunch of changes. I work until 10:30pm, send it to him, go home because I'm pissed. I've billed 5 hours that day. It is now Wednesday and I'm on pace for a 30-hour week, maybe. If it keeps up, I'm on pace for a 120-hour month, or so. The truth is I don't feel like I just worked a 7.5- or 5-hour day. I feel like I just worked two 16-hour days, and I'm exhausted. My time not working those days was spent trying to get work, or twiddling my thumbs wondering why I wasn't getting work, or whether I'm too slow. Anxiety at my ability to catch up on my hours begins to creep in as my satisfaction of a completed 200-hour month fades away. I realize it's going to be one of "those" months, where I bill 130-140 hours, which makes me look slow, but really I billed hours all over the board, barely got sleep, and checked my phone every 2 minutes.
Fast-forward to next month. I did, in fact, only bill about 130 hours. But, hey, several new M&A deals are on their way down the pipeline, and they all have massive data rooms and maybe one is a contribution so that means double the fucking drafting, so no worries about hours anymore, right? It's about to be a 250-hour month. But didn't you just have a 140-hour month? You surely used the slowdown to catch up on sleep and chill, right?
I mean, shit, isn't 140 hours, like, only 6 hours per day anyway?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Can't remember. Certainly not since I started law school.Desert Fox wrote:and it doesnt even have to be someone else just taking a long time.
Students, honestly reflect on this question, when was the last time you worked on studying, outlines, reading for 8 hours straight. No facebook, no chatting, no TLSing. You'll all day 16 hour finals cram? How much did you actually work MAYBE 10 hours.
This folks. Do you know how it feels in the two weeks before finals, when all you're doing is reading and outlining? Work is like that all the time. The difference is that, when you finish your finals, you usually get to take two or three weeks off completely, and then you don't really have to work hard again until half a year later. At a firm, by contrast, your reward for finishing a busy two weeks is....another busy two weeks. Rinse and repeat until you quit/are forced out/have a nervous breakdown.Desert Fox wrote:and it doesnt even have to be someone else just taking a long time.
Students, honestly reflect on this question, when was the last time you worked on studying, outlines, reading for 8 hours straight. No facebook, no chatting, no TLSing. You'll all day 16 hour finals cram? How much did you actually work MAYBE 10 hours.
This is one of the best posts in the history of TLS. Bravo man, bravo.wildhaggis wrote:OK, just read through the entire thread and, while this issue may have been put to rest, I have to comment on it.
I read through several posts debating whether 100+ hours is "expected" in biglaw or not, and some dude pushing all the blame for such hours on OP because his V10 told him that average billables were less than 2100 during a record year. "That's only 45- to 55- hour weeks!" "2800 hours is barely 48 60-hour weeks!"
This is complete fucking bullshit.
Even if 100+ hours is not expected, and even if 2000 is a typical billing average, this has nothing to do with how those hours were spent and paints nothing resembling an accurate picture of what a 2000-hour, 2500-hour, or even 1900-hour year may look like. That KidStuddi suggests a 2800-hour year is "barely" 48 60-hour weeks ("Look, you even have a bunch of time for vacation!"), or that a 2100-hour year is consistently working 45-55 hours a week, makes me genuinely question whether he is flame or not.
Let's take a look at why this is the case. I'll use an example that is illustrative of how biglaw corp works: I just finish up a pretty busy 200-hour month. I'm lagging a bit on my hours because last month was slow, but I'm confident I can catch up. I come in to work and the other matters I'm staffed on are pencils down or in some kind of a lull. I do some small post-closing things and ask around for work. No one has anything at the moment, so I work on this or that until 6pm, not having much to do. I've billed about 2.5 hours. I tool around a bit and decide to leave early at 7pm. Partner A sends me an e-mail at 8:30pm saying he needs some such fucking thing ASAP. I work for 4 hours, send it to him. He sends back comments. Why the fuck is he still awake. I take another hour to work in his comments, send it back to him. It's now after 2am, and I've billed approximately 7.5 hours that day.
I come in the next day, tired, still not much to do. I ask around for work again... Nothing. Partner A gets back to me on the document from the night before at 5:30pm. He spoke to the client and needs me to turn a bunch of changes. I work until 10:30pm, send it to him, go home because I'm pissed. I've billed 5 hours that day. It is now Wednesday and I'm on pace for a 30-hour week, maybe. If it keeps up, I'm on pace for a 120-hour month, or so. The truth is I don't feel like I just worked a 7.5- or 5-hour day. I feel like I just worked two 16-hour days, and I'm exhausted. My time not working those days was spent trying to get work, or twiddling my thumbs wondering why I wasn't getting work, or whether I'm too slow. Anxiety at my ability to catch up on my hours begins to creep in as my satisfaction of a completed 200-hour month fades away. I realize it's going to be one of "those" months, where I bill 130-140 hours, which makes me look slow, but really I billed hours all over the board, barely got sleep, and checked my phone every 2 minutes.
Fast-forward to next month. I did, in fact, only bill about 130 hours. But, hey, several new M&A deals are on their way down the pipeline, and they all have massive data rooms and maybe one is a contribution so that means double the fucking drafting, so no worries about hours anymore, right? It's about to be a 250-hour month. But didn't you just have a 140-hour month? You surely used the slowdown to catch up on sleep and chill, right?
I mean, shit, isn't 140 hours, like, only 6 hours per day anyway?
Your perspective is heavily colored by your firm being slow, your partners being shitty, and the fact that you apparently compound it all by losing sleep of it. Maybe your experience is more reflective of typical BigLaw, but it certainly doesn't come anywhere close to describing any week I've ever had.wildhaggis wrote:OK, just read through the entire thread and, while this issue may have been put to rest, I have to comment on it.
I read through several posts debating whether 100+ hours is "expected" in biglaw or not, and some dude pushing all the blame for such hours on OP because his V10 told him that average billables were less than 2100 during a record year. "That's only 45- to 55- hour weeks!" "2800 hours is barely 48 60-hour weeks!"
This is complete fucking bullshit.
Even if 100+ hours is not expected, and even if 2000 is a typical billing average, this has nothing to do with how those hours were spent and paints nothing resembling an accurate picture of what a 2000-hour, 2500-hour, or even 1900-hour year may look like. That KidStuddi suggests a 2800-hour year is "barely" 48 60-hour weeks ("Look, you even have a bunch of time for vacation!"), or that a 2100-hour year is consistently working 45-55 hours a week, makes me genuinely question whether he is flame or not.
Let's take a look at why this is the case. I'll use an example that is illustrative of how biglaw corp works: I just finish up a pretty busy 200-hour month. I'm lagging a bit on my hours because last month was slow, but I'm confident I can catch up. I come in to work and the other matters I'm staffed on are pencils down or in some kind of a lull. I do some small post-closing things and ask around for work. No one has anything at the moment, so I work on this or that until 6pm, not having much to do. I've billed about 2.5 hours. I tool around a bit and decide to leave early at 7pm. Partner A sends me an e-mail at 8:30pm saying he needs some such fucking thing ASAP. I work for 4 hours, send it to him. He sends back comments. Why the fuck is he still awake. I take another hour to work in his comments, send it back to him. It's now after 2am, and I've billed approximately 7.5 hours that day.
I come in the next day, tired, still not much to do. I ask around for work again... Nothing. Partner A gets back to me on the document from the night before at 5:30pm. He spoke to the client and needs me to turn a bunch of changes. I work until 10:30pm, send it to him, go home because I'm pissed. I've billed 5 hours that day. It is now Wednesday and I'm on pace for a 30-hour week, maybe. If it keeps up, I'm on pace for a 120-hour month, or so. The truth is I don't feel like I just worked a 7.5- or 5-hour day. I feel like I just worked two 16-hour days, and I'm exhausted. My time not working those days was spent trying to get work, or twiddling my thumbs wondering why I wasn't getting work, or whether I'm too slow. Anxiety at my ability to catch up on my hours begins to creep in as my satisfaction of a completed 200-hour month fades away. I realize it's going to be one of "those" months, where I bill 130-140 hours, which makes me look slow, but really I billed hours all over the board, barely got sleep, and checked my phone every 2 minutes.
Fast-forward to next month. I did, in fact, only bill about 130 hours. But, hey, several new M&A deals are on their way down the pipeline, and they all have massive data rooms and maybe one is a contribution so that means double the fucking drafting, so no worries about hours anymore, right? It's about to be a 250-hour month. But didn't you just have a 140-hour month? You surely used the slowdown to catch up on sleep and chill, right?
I mean, shit, isn't 140 hours, like, only 6 hours per day anyway?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Eh, whatever. People are being sold some tall tales that strike me as fairly fucking dramatic. I'm trying to discredit the sob stories based on actual experience and numbers publicized by peer firms and being called a flame for it. Guess that's about right for this forum though.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Cool time sheet bro.
To add my 2 cents:KidStuddi wrote:
Your perspective is heavily colored by your firm being slow, your partners being shitty, and the fact that you apparently compound it all by losing sleep of it. Maybe your experience is more reflective of typical BigLaw, but it certainly doesn't come anywhere close to describing any week I've ever had.
Perhaps it's a fair criticism to say my experience doesn't represent all of BigLaw or every practice group, because I will admit my firm is just about never slow. That was, however, exactly why I felt pretty confident in saying that since 110 hour weeks aren't expected here, where virtually no one is ever "slow," they probably aren't expected anywhere.
You've described what your firm is like, here's where I'm coming from:
I haven't asked for work in at least 6 months and the last time I remember doing so was because two deals blew up in the same week. All time, it's at least a 90/10 split saying no vs asking for work. Probably closer to 95/5. Despite the constant barrage of work thrown at me, no one has ever demanded that I work 110 hours in a week. No one has ever looked at my sideways when I say I need help to make a hard deadline. No one has ever written be a scathing review or even a remotely negative review because I said I had other commitments that would keep me from working on their matter.
If I ever do "need" work, there's pretty much an endless supply of it. The danger at my firm is taking on extra work and over committing yourself, not getting in trouble because you don't have enough hours. We have a pool of 100+ staff attorneys to deal with overflow and pretty much any of that work could easily be given to a junior-midish associate. It's why people can bill 2,800 hours a year regularly around here while the average is still right around 2,000.
I don't have days where I sit around "working" but not doing jack shit and only bill 2 hours because if such a day every presented itself, I'd either A) work on one of my "whenever you can get to it" pro bono matters (of which an unlimited amount of hours count the same as billables for me, but I think most places give you at least 50-100) or B) answer any important e-mails and then go/stay the fuck home if I didn't feel like working that day. Either way, that doesn't sound like a stressful day to me. I certainly wouldn't be losing sleep over it.
And you can think whatever you want, but 2,800 hours being "barely humanly possible" is just plain inaccurate. Averaging my last six months (including pro bono because I can't separate it out), I'm on track for about 2,500 this year, and I didn't work the last two weeks of December. I leave by 7-7:30 most nights (though I sporadically work from home after dinner if required), and I tend to be one of the later leavers on my floor. I'm also an early riser and so tend to get in before almost everyone most days. I also work from home on weekend mornings regularly, which is also atypical but I front-run work wherever I can because I like to have the flexibility to go out weeknights. And it tends to work for me: I have season tickets to the NBA in my city and I've only missed 2 games this season because of work. Maybe once or twice going meant coming back to the office after the game, but I'll take that trade-off most any night.
The point of all this is to emphasize that while I could be working a lot less than I choose to and be in line with the norms around here, I consider my work schedule very manageable. Still, I would end up pretty close to 2,800 this calendar year without changing much anything if I just continued at my current pace and did not take any vacation in 2015 (remember my 6 month sample pace includes 2 weeks of vacation, so equivalent to about 4 full as extrapolated to the year). And I know it's feasible to do even more than that, because there are try-hard nutjobs around here who are here when I get in and when I leave pretty much every day, so they're almost certainly doing more.
I'm of course not going to actually hit 2,800 by foregoing my vacation because I goddamn well earned it and I'm using it. That and there's nothing to be gained by it other than making more money for a bunch of partners that already have 3.4M+ PPP. Even 2,500 is dumb and I'd have a lot fewer if I hadn't said yes to a few matters solely because I have a man crush on the senior associate.
Here are my hours for February and March through today. Couple of mid-week all nighters here and there, but didn't miss a single game during this stretch and went out pretty much every Friday and Saturday. Even took two weekends off in a row this month to go looking for a new place to live. Keep in mind these hours reflect turning down work at least twice a week; I could consistently have more if I wanted to join the gunner club.
Edit: realized that my screenshots cut off the totals. 259 for feb and 229 through March 24.
I cannot believe someone posted timesheet. I love this place.KidStuddi wrote: Here are my hours for February and March through today. Couple of mid-week all nighters here and there, but didn't miss a single game during this stretch and went out pretty much every Friday and Saturday. Even took two weekends off in a row this month to go looking for a new place to live. Keep in mind these hours reflect turning down work at least twice a week; I could consistently have more if I wanted to join the gunner club.
Edit: realized that my screenshots cut off the totals. 259 for feb and 229 through March 24.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
If i'm in the office not doing shit, then I just add those "lost hours" to the future billable work that I get. Done and done.KidStuddi wrote:Your perspective is heavily colored by your firm being slow, your partners being shitty, and the fact that you apparently compound it all by losing sleep of it. Maybe your experience is more reflective of typical BigLaw, but it certainly doesn't come anywhere close to describing any week I've ever had.wildhaggis wrote:OK, just read through the entire thread and, while this issue may have been put to rest, I have to comment on it.
I read through several posts debating whether 100+ hours is "expected" in biglaw or not, and some dude pushing all the blame for such hours on OP because his V10 told him that average billables were less than 2100 during a record year. "That's only 45- to 55- hour weeks!" "2800 hours is barely 48 60-hour weeks!"
This is complete fucking bullshit.
Even if 100+ hours is not expected, and even if 2000 is a typical billing average, this has nothing to do with how those hours were spent and paints nothing resembling an accurate picture of what a 2000-hour, 2500-hour, or even 1900-hour year may look like. That KidStuddi suggests a 2800-hour year is "barely" 48 60-hour weeks ("Look, you even have a bunch of time for vacation!"), or that a 2100-hour year is consistently working 45-55 hours a week, makes me genuinely question whether he is flame or not.
Let's take a look at why this is the case. I'll use an example that is illustrative of how biglaw corp works: I just finish up a pretty busy 200-hour month. I'm lagging a bit on my hours because last month was slow, but I'm confident I can catch up. I come in to work and the other matters I'm staffed on are pencils down or in some kind of a lull. I do some small post-closing things and ask around for work. No one has anything at the moment, so I work on this or that until 6pm, not having much to do. I've billed about 2.5 hours. I tool around a bit and decide to leave early at 7pm. Partner A sends me an e-mail at 8:30pm saying he needs some such fucking thing ASAP. I work for 4 hours, send it to him. He sends back comments. Why the fuck is he still awake. I take another hour to work in his comments, send it back to him. It's now after 2am, and I've billed approximately 7.5 hours that day.
I come in the next day, tired, still not much to do. I ask around for work again... Nothing. Partner A gets back to me on the document from the night before at 5:30pm. He spoke to the client and needs me to turn a bunch of changes. I work until 10:30pm, send it to him, go home because I'm pissed. I've billed 5 hours that day. It is now Wednesday and I'm on pace for a 30-hour week, maybe. If it keeps up, I'm on pace for a 120-hour month, or so. The truth is I don't feel like I just worked a 7.5- or 5-hour day. I feel like I just worked two 16-hour days, and I'm exhausted. My time not working those days was spent trying to get work, or twiddling my thumbs wondering why I wasn't getting work, or whether I'm too slow. Anxiety at my ability to catch up on my hours begins to creep in as my satisfaction of a completed 200-hour month fades away. I realize it's going to be one of "those" months, where I bill 130-140 hours, which makes me look slow, but really I billed hours all over the board, barely got sleep, and checked my phone every 2 minutes.
Fast-forward to next month. I did, in fact, only bill about 130 hours. But, hey, several new M&A deals are on their way down the pipeline, and they all have massive data rooms and maybe one is a contribution so that means double the fucking drafting, so no worries about hours anymore, right? It's about to be a 250-hour month. But didn't you just have a 140-hour month? You surely used the slowdown to catch up on sleep and chill, right?
I mean, shit, isn't 140 hours, like, only 6 hours per day anyway?
Perhaps it's a fair criticism to say my experience doesn't represent all of BigLaw or every practice group, because I will admit my firm is just about never slow. That was, however, exactly why I felt pretty confident in saying that since 110 hour weeks aren't expected here, where virtually no one is ever "slow," they probably aren't expected anywhere.
You've described what your firm is like, here's where I'm coming from:
I haven't asked for work in at least 6 months and the last time I remember doing so was because two deals blew up in the same week. All time, it's at least a 90/10 split saying no vs asking for work. Probably closer to 95/5. Despite the constant barrage of work thrown at me, no one has ever demanded that I work 110 hours in a week. No one has ever looked at my sideways when I say I need help to make a hard deadline. No one has ever written me a scathing review or even a remotely negative review because I said I had other commitments that would keep me from working on their matter.
If I ever do "need" work, there's pretty much an endless supply of it. The danger at my firm is taking on extra work and over committing yourself, not getting in trouble because you don't have enough hours. We have a pool of 100+ staff attorneys to deal with overflow and pretty much any of that work could easily be given to a junior-midish associate. It's why people can bill 2,800 hours a year regularly around here while the average is still right around 2,000.
I don't have days where I sit around "working" but not doing jack shit and only bill 2 hours because if such a day every presented itself, I'd either A) work on one of my "whenever you can get to it" pro bono matters (of which an unlimited amount of hours count the same as billables for me, but I think most places give you at least 50-100) or B) answer any important e-mails and then go/stay the fuck home if I didn't feel like working that day. Either way, that doesn't sound like a stressful day to me. I certainly wouldn't be losing sleep over it.
And you can think whatever you want, but 2,800 hours being "barely humanly possible" is just plain inaccurate. Averaging my last six months (including pro bono because I can't separate it out), I'm on track for about 2,500 this year, and I didn't work the last two weeks of December. I leave by 7-7:30 most nights (though I sporadically work from home after dinner if required), and I tend to be one of the later leavers on my floor. I'm also an early riser and so tend to get in before almost everyone most days. I also work from home on weekend mornings regularly, which is also atypical but I front-run work wherever I can because I like to have the flexibility to go out weeknights. And it tends to work for me: I have season tickets to the NBA in my city and I've only missed 2 games this season because of work. Maybe once or twice going meant coming back to the office after the game, but I'll take that trade-off most any night.
The point of all this is to emphasize that while I could be working a lot less than I choose to and be in line with the norms around here, I consider my work schedule very manageable. Still, I would end up pretty close to 2,800 this calendar year without changing much anything if I just continued at my current pace and did not take any vacation in 2015 (remember my 6 month sample pace includes 2 weeks of vacation, so equivalent to about 4 full as extrapolated to the year). And I know it's feasible to do even more than that, because there are try-hard nutjobs around here who are here when I get in and when I leave pretty much every day, so they're almost certainly doing more.
I'm of course not going to actually hit 2,800 by foregoing my vacation because I goddamn well earned it and I'm using it. That and there's nothing to be gained by it other than making more money for a bunch of partners that already have 3.4M+ PPP. Even 2,500 is dumb and I'd have a lot fewer if I hadn't said yes to a few matters solely because I have a man crush on the senior associate.
Here are my hours for February and March through today. Couple of mid-week all nighters here and there, but didn't miss a single game during this stretch and went out pretty much every Friday and Saturday. Even took two weekends off in a row this month to go looking for a new place to live. Keep in mind these hours reflect turning down work at least twice a week; I could consistently have more if I wanted to join the gunner club.
Edit: realized that my screenshots cut off the totals. 259 for feb and 229 through March 24.
Edit 2: Realized not everyone follows the NBA. There are 41 home games in a season and the season is about 75% over. Most teams have played ~30 home games by this point and I've been able to attend all but 2 without much difficultly.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
It doesn't make sense. I don't see what was so horrible/embarrassing about you anonymously posting your screenshots of your timesheets.KidStuddi wrote:This is an 8 page long thread about hours where multiple people have described their horrible weeks and you guys are salty that I took screenshots rather than describing what my week to week fluctuations look like?
How does that even make sense to you?
I like the screenshotsKidStuddi wrote:This is an 8 page long thread about hours where multiple people have described their horrible weeks and you guys are salty that I took screenshots rather than describing what my week to week fluctuations look like?
How does that even make sense to you?
No one is "salty." You just have aspergers.KidStuddi wrote:This is an 8 page long thread about hours where multiple people have described their horrible weeks and you guys are salty that I took screenshots rather than describing what my week to week fluctuations look like?
How does that even make sense to you?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login