Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 273094
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:07 pm

KD35 wrote:Relationship based questions for you:

1) I know you say you have a wife/kids. How common is it for people to still be married once they were senior associates/income partners?

2) You mentioned that some people left because they wanted to start families. Do you feel like it was feasible to find someone/get married while working biglaw?


I would say most people who had a wife and kids and made it to senior/income were still married. I can only think of one person who had issues but the issues existed at the junior level and maybe even before starting at the firm.

It seems like you could meet someone while working but the person would need to understand your schedule and be on board with it. I have known a handful of people who have gotten married while working here and at other biglaw firms. IT is probably more difficult just because meeting someone is probably harder than like the college environment and you work more hours than most. But it's certainly possible. In fact my best friend met and got married while working at a V5 in NYC.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273094
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:37 pm

KD35 wrote:Separate post for separate realm of questions:

Of your peers at other firms (or I guess the people that you knew that went to different firms right out of law school): Was your firm outside the norm? Or is your firm "typical" in the sense of culture/quality.

I obviously know there is a difference between the Lathams of the world and the MTOs of the world, but trying to get a sense of your firm's culture and whether it is "typical."


I think firm culture here is that if you are driven, you get to kind of make your own career. For example, I really like section 16 and exchange act reporting so I was able to get like maybe 80% of all the reporting work that comes in the door here. Mostly because others hate it or think its stupid/boring, but I put my name out there within the firm, did it well, and partners just started dumping it on me. Plus I convinced current clients, as like a 3rd year, to let me draft their proxies, which was (a) a form of business development that most would not think of that is actually pretty lucrative, and (b) not something most clients typically would go for without a push because it can be pretty pricey. And no partner ever stopped me or said anything negative about it, like go through the channels or whatever. The culture is very entrepreneurial. That could be a practice group thing but I'm not so sure.

Also, regarding other firms, I think it really depends on practice group and mentors/partners. At the end of the day, one partner can really screw your career over, or so I have been told. I think the culture within my group is not typical.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273094
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:40 pm

mikes82 wrote:1. How would a background as a military officer (within special operations forces, to be exact) be viewed by most firms? Is it possible one could be pigeonholed because of his /that background, or would it be viewed somewhat favorably?
2. Ties into the above question, would that background help better explain one's age during the hiring process? And provided one had received a T6 degree, prior to joining the military, would that degree lose worth as time went on (in other words, would that individual's law degree be viewed as being somewhat lesser than a recent graduate when hiring?)?


So just to be clear, you have a law degree from a top school and then went to the special operations forces and now want to work in biglaw? Background will be interesting and not viewed poorly, I do not think anyone would discriminate against you during the interview process. If your grades are good then it will be fine. The one problem will be why did you get a law degree then go to the service and now want to come back out? Should have a good answer for that.

User avatar
skers
Posts: 4950
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby skers » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:05 pm

We get mixed info about the breakdown of people who are asked to leave before 6-7 years in and those that just move for other opportunities on their own, what would you say the breakdown has been in your experience? For the most part of people able to stay 6-7+ years if they can stand big law, more of a mix, or what? I know since you started in 07 or so that might skew things a bit.

mikes82
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 11:21 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby mikes82 » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:17 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
mikes82 wrote:1. How would a background as a military officer (within special operations forces, to be exact) be viewed by most firms? Is it possible one could be pigeonholed because of his /that background, or would it be viewed somewhat favorably?
2. Ties into the above question, would that background help better explain one's age during the hiring process? And provided one had received a T6 degree, prior to joining the military, would that degree lose worth as time went on (in other words, would that individual's law degree be viewed as being somewhat lesser than a recent graduate when hiring?)?


So just to be clear, you have a law degree from a top school and then went to the special operations forces and now want to work in biglaw? Background will be interesting and not viewed poorly, I do not think anyone would discriminate against you during the interview process. If your grades are good then it will be fine. The one problem will be why did you get a law degree then go to the service and now want to come back out? Should have a good answer for that.


I appreciate the reply, thank you.

I have an explanation, but I'd rather not share it on an open forum. I hope you can understand. Regardless, would you venture to say that potential employers would be interested in that transition in particular?

Also, just to confirm, most law firms wouldn't be dismayed by the fact that I had graduated some years earlier, correct?

I have a few more questions, if you could answer them, it would be much appreciated.

-In your experience, is it fairly common to see incoming associates with military backgrounds? If so, what background did they typically have?

-At your firm, on average, how many years does it take to make equity partner? And what qualities would you say are imperative when it comes to making equity partner?

-What is the average age of most equity partners where you work?

-Excuse me, but how great is the disparity in pay between income/non-equity partners and equity partners at your firm? What would you say most income partners are taking home and how does that compare to the equity partners? Is there anyone at your firm making high 7's, possibly low 8's? If you don't want to provide figures, I completely understand.

-How was your work/life balance when you first started, and how is it now? Did your job hinder your relationship with your wife and children?

-If you had any advice for someone who sought to make partner, what would it be and why?

I may have a few questions later, or I might not. Either way, I just wanted to say thank you again for taking the time out to do this.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273094
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:37 pm

skers wrote:We get mixed info about the breakdown of people who are asked to leave before 6-7 years in and those that just move for other opportunities on their own, what would you say the breakdown has been in your experience? For the most part of people able to stay 6-7+ years if they can stand big law, more of a mix, or what? I know since you started in 07 or so that might skew things a bit.


I answered this but now my reply is missing but I will just summarize: the firm is good about letting you know if you will make income partner but essentially they start telling you around the fifth year. So you have a few years to figure it out. You make income after 6 or 7 years. Most get to the 6th year associate level before getting income the following year. On review at your 6th year associate transition, they pretty much tell you that you are getting partner the following year if you stick around. Most but not all that stick it out to that point will stay around.

I would say that most people leave on their own before the 6-7 year range but i think maybe a third are pushed toward leaving. The firm really wants everyone to stick it out to the 5-6 year mark, in my experience.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273094
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:46 pm

mikes82 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
mikes82 wrote:1. How would a background as a military officer (within special operations forces, to be exact) be viewed by most firms? Is it possible one could be pigeonholed because of his /that background, or would it be viewed somewhat favorably?
2. Ties into the above question, would that background help better explain one's age during the hiring process? And provided one had received a T6 degree, prior to joining the military, would that degree lose worth as time went on (in other words, would that individual's law degree be viewed as being somewhat lesser than a recent graduate when hiring?)?


So just to be clear, you have a law degree from a top school and then went to the special operations forces and now want to work in biglaw? Background will be interesting and not viewed poorly, I do not think anyone would discriminate against you during the interview process. If your grades are good then it will be fine. The one problem will be why did you get a law degree then go to the service and now want to come back out? Should have a good answer for that.


I appreciate the reply, thank you.

I have an explanation, but I'd rather not share it on an open forum. I hope you can understand. Regardless, would you venture to say that potential employers would be interested in that transition in particular?

Also, just to confirm, most law firms wouldn't be dismayed by the fact that I had graduated some years earlier, correct?

I have a few more questions, if you could answer them, it would be much appreciated.

-In your experience, is it fairly common to see incoming associates with military backgrounds? If so, what background did they typically have?

-At your firm, on average, how many years does it take to make equity partner? And what qualities would you say are imperative when it comes to making equity partner?

-What is the average age of most equity partners where you work?

-Excuse me, but how great is the disparity in pay between income/non-equity partners and equity partners at your firm? What would you say most income partners are taking home and how does that compare to the equity partners? Is there anyone at your firm making high 7's, possibly low 8's? If you don't want to provide figures, I completely understand.

-How was your work/life balance when you first started, and how is it now? Did your job hinder your relationship with your wife and children?

-If you had any advice for someone who sought to make partner, what would it be and why?

I may have a few questions later, or I might not. Either way, I just wanted to say thank you again for taking the time out to do this.


I think it could raise some questions about how committed to practicing but if you have a good explanation then ok. You will need a cover letter for sure to explain it because you might get screened out. Have you passed the bar, that will help.

Most incoming associates do not have military backgrounds, I think it is more rare than common.

Average age of equity partner. I really do not know. We are a little younger here than most. It takes like 10 years to equity I would guess, on average. It is very difficult to get equity here. I have explained the traits in this thread already and don't want to rehash but you can find them easy enough. The income disparity is huge between income and equity partners. We have some partners you are making over 5 million, and it is common knowledge in the biglaw circle. Try abovethelaw.com for more info on that. Advice for making partner is also peppered in this thread already.

My job has gotten in the way with my family a few times but I have an understanding wife who gets it and knew what she was getting into. The kids don't understand sometimes and that hurts but honestly, my firm is not big on face time so I don't miss too many marquee events. I end up working really late for it and miss out on a great deal of sleep sometimes, as I have described earlier in this thread. Biglaw does not kill your family, people kill their own families (figuratively speaking) by the choices they make while working in biglaw. No one forces you to stay once the issues start piling up and you have to choose what's more important or find a way to make both work.

mikes82
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 11:21 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby mikes82 » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:21 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
mikes82 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
mikes82 wrote:1. How would a background as a military officer (within special operations forces, to be exact) be viewed by most firms? Is it possible one could be pigeonholed because of his /that background, or would it be viewed somewhat favorably?
2. Ties into the above question, would that background help better explain one's age during the hiring process? And provided one had received a T6 degree, prior to joining the military, would that degree lose worth as time went on (in other words, would that individual's law degree be viewed as being somewhat lesser than a recent graduate when hiring?)?


So just to be clear, you have a law degree from a top school and then went to the special operations forces and now want to work in biglaw? Background will be interesting and not viewed poorly, I do not think anyone would discriminate against you during the interview process. If your grades are good then it will be fine. The one problem will be why did you get a law degree then go to the service and now want to come back out? Should have a good answer for that.


I appreciate the reply, thank you.

I have an explanation, but I'd rather not share it on an open forum. I hope you can understand. Regardless, would you venture to say that potential employers would be interested in that transition in particular?

Also, just to confirm, most law firms wouldn't be dismayed by the fact that I had graduated some years earlier, correct?

I have a few more questions, if you could answer them, it would be much appreciated.

-In your experience, is it fairly common to see incoming associates with military backgrounds? If so, what background did they typically have?

-At your firm, on average, how many years does it take to make equity partner? And what qualities would you say are imperative when it comes to making equity partner?

-What is the average age of most equity partners where you work?

-Excuse me, but how great is the disparity in pay between income/non-equity partners and equity partners at your firm? What would you say most income partners are taking home and how does that compare to the equity partners? Is there anyone at your firm making high 7's, possibly low 8's? If you don't want to provide figures, I completely understand.

-How was your work/life balance when you first started, and how is it now? Did your job hinder your relationship with your wife and children?

-If you had any advice for someone who sought to make partner, what would it be and why?

I may have a few questions later, or I might not. Either way, I just wanted to say thank you again for taking the time out to do this.


I think it could raise some questions about how committed to practicing but if you have a good explanation then ok. You will need a cover letter for sure to explain it because you might get screened out. Have you passed the bar, that will help.

Most incoming associates do not have military backgrounds, I think it is more rare than common.

Average age of equity partner. I really do not know. We are a little younger here than most. It takes like 10 years to equity I would guess, on average. It is very difficult to get equity here. I have explained the traits in this thread already and don't want to rehash but you can find them easy enough. The income disparity is huge between income and equity partners. We have some partners you are making over 5 million, and it is common knowledge in the biglaw circle. Try abovethelaw.com for more info on that. Advice for making partner is also peppered in this thread already.

My job has gotten in the way with my family a few times but I have an understanding wife who gets it and knew what she was getting into. The kids don't understand sometimes and that hurts but honestly, my firm is not big on face time so I don't miss too many marquee events. I end up working really late for it and miss out on a great deal of sleep sometimes, as I have described earlier in this thread. Biglaw does not kill your family, people kill their own families (figuratively speaking) by the choices they make while working in biglaw. No one forces you to stay once the issues start piling up and you have to choose what's more important or find a way to make both work.


Screened out?

and Yes, I've passed the bar.

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Cobretti » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:31 pm

mikes82 wrote:1. How would a background as a military officer (within special operations forces, to be exact) be viewed by most firms? Is it possible one could be pigeonholed because of his /that background, or would it be viewed somewhat favorably?
2. Ties into the above question, would that background help better explain one's age during the hiring process? And provided one had received a T6 degree, prior to joining the military, would that degree lose worth as time went on (in other words, would that individual's law degree be viewed as being somewhat lesser than a recent graduate when hiring?)?

You should probably check out the Veterans' Thread. I don't know of anyone that has your timeline but it should still be a good place to talk to other veterans about biglaw hiring, etc.

User avatar
PariSiamo
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:03 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby PariSiamo » Sat Jan 31, 2015 2:04 pm

Did you attend UChicago? What is your general impression of UChicago grads/would you have any advice specific to a future UChicago student?

User avatar
06102016
Posts: 13466
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby 06102016 » Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:12 pm

..

Anonymous User
Posts: 273094
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Biglaw Income Partner Taking Qs

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:48 pm

Is OP still around?




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.