What's difference between representing PE clients in M&A

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:15 pm

What's difference between representing PE clients in M&A

Postby blueberry2 » Mon Jan 05, 2015 3:15 pm

transactions vs. strategic buyers? Any legal substantive differences?


Posts: 679
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:03 pm

Re: What's difference between representing PE clients in M&A

Postby desertlaw » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:11 am

Biggest 2 factors/differences in M&A, IMO, is (1) buy-side vs. sell-side and (2) public vs. private.

Buy-side deals are usually a lot more work in my experience, especially because you are inspecting every material part of the target company that the your client is buying, along with dealing with the financing of the transaction and also have to work on the company post-closing. Further, you are somewhat at the mercy of the target/target's counsel because they contain all the information that you want to know.

Private deals are often more work on the actual deal, both the transaction structure and the diligence/disclosure schedules (private deals can usually get more creative with the negotiations/structure and often times diligence is worse because public clients are more organized and have their bigger contracts/debt all publicly disclosed), but public company deals have a lot of filing/disclosure work with the SEC.

Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.