2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Jesus Christ. Whining about 250 after tax bucks.
-
- Posts: 428462
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Actually, the marginal tax rate for people earning at or about $33,000 in their sub-year is 15%, so it's $425 after fed taxes. See http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphilli ... -and-more/JohannDeMann wrote:Jesus Christ. Whining about 250 after tax bucks.
For some people, $425 is real money. I'm sorry that I'm not rich.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:00 am, edited 2 times in total.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
i got way more than i expected so either my firm was generous with proration or i screwed up my calculation. probably the latter
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:39 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Seriously. Rude. It's a legitimate question, and even $250 is real money.Anonymous User wrote:Actually, the marginal tax rate for people earning at or about $33,000 in their sub-year is 15%, so it's $425 after fed taxes. See http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphilli ... -and-more/JohannDeMann wrote:Jesus Christ. Whining about 250 after tax bucks.
For some people, $425 is real money. I'm sorry that I'm not rich.
- gk101
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 6:22 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
eh its kind of a pointless question. Its not like he can get go back and choose a different firm that prorates. And since he won't name the firm, its not much help to others deciding on firms (and if someone decides between firms based on $400, they are idiots)m079 wrote:Seriously. Rude. It's a legitimate question, and even $250 is real money.Anonymous User wrote:Actually, the marginal tax rate for people earning at or about $33,000 in their sub-year is 15%, so it's $425 after fed taxes. See http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphilli ... -and-more/JohannDeMann wrote:Jesus Christ. Whining about 250 after tax bucks.
For some people, $425 is real money. I'm sorry that I'm not rich.
so yeah this is just pointless whining
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428462
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
I'm at a non-NY firm that claimed to match by giving me $2500. I didn't complain but I couldnt really figure out how they got to that number either (start date was in Oct)Anonymous User wrote:how did other people's NY market-matching firms do proration for class of 2014?
my NY V20ish didn't do a real proration, despite matching the market for all other classes, but just gave a flat $2,500 to class of 2014. Actual proration would have resulted in us getting about $500 or so more depending on start date.
-
- Posts: 428462
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
GDC just matched DPW for non-NY associates.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
250 or 450 is not real money for someone making 160k a year. Sorry bros. You can't pull the poverty card ITT.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Not news.Anonymous User wrote:GDC just matched DPW for non-NY associates.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Net worth is a much more important consideration than income. To someone with $200k of debt, saving five bucks at the cleaners matters.Desert Fox wrote:250 or 450 is not real money for someone making 160k a year. Sorry bros. You can't pull the poverty card ITT.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Gotta consider cash flow too bro.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Net worth is a much more important consideration than income. To someone with $200k of debt, saving five bucks at the cleaners matters.Desert Fox wrote:250 or 450 is not real money for someone making 160k a year. Sorry bros. You can't pull the poverty card ITT.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
also net worth doesn't matter at all. every homeless dude has a higher net worth than me, and probably will forever
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
in this demo as wellfats provolone wrote:also net worth doesn't matter at all. every homeless dude has a higher net worth than me, and probably will forever
feels bad, man
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
I'd feel worse if I were sleeping on the street though. yea the govt gets 10-15% of my income for the rest of my life but that's like having a kid at 25 and getting divorced. which a lotta people do and it's alright.
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Are you ever not fucking obnoxious?Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Net worth is a much more important consideration than income. To someone with $200k of debt, saving five bucks at the cleaners matters.Desert Fox wrote:250 or 450 is not real money for someone making 160k a year. Sorry bros. You can't pull the poverty card ITT.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Someone in big law with $200k in debt who gets an extra $400 will be out of debt approximately one day sooner.
- 15 styx
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 5:04 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
Given that I started the week after I was barred, I thought our firm’s bonus was generous, considering I was expecting $0. Their formula for newly minted first years is pretty simple, one week’s pay.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
$400 is a lot of money. That's way more than half my month's meal budget.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
but way less than half of your new bag.zweitbester wrote:$400 is a lot of money. That's way more than half my month's meal budget.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
- B.B. Homemaker
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:00 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
I can't picture ever getting to the point where I feel like it isn't a lot of money. I might matter less, but it'll still be a non-negligible amount of money.
This is just in a general sense, not specifically in the context of deciding how to feel about a bonus.
This is just in a general sense, not specifically in the context of deciding how to feel about a bonus.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
mfh has fucking ruined my perspective on wealth
if ur not in banking or something financy or a trustfundee ur a middle-class peasant
if ur not in banking or something financy or a trustfundee ur a middle-class peasant
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:52 pm
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
you seem very dumbthelawyler wrote:Yeah. There's no way tuition factors in. And anyone who thinks that working inside a company with partners doesn't expose you to a general feel about what firms care about is being dense.
With that said, I'm going to spout more bullshit.
LOL. You have some of the poorest reasoning and reading skills on this site. The only argument was that the poor reputation and desperation of the legal industry may put downward pressure on prices. It was more of a market trend analysis regarding bargaining power at the hour-rate negotiating table (which of course I know nothing about).westphillybandr wrote:So firms will pay their junior associates more to be more attractive to clients? The same clients you say are unwilling to pay for junior associates? This is one of the poorest arguments I have read on this site. And that is a low bar.thelawyler wrote:This. Also, it is a signal to the clients. The elite law schools are full of people who came from consulting, finance, etc before law school. The young analysts at those industries do look at law school as an alternative. But they also talk to each other while pondering of their future. If law as a career looks bleak, they'll tell each other not to go. And then they may tell their mentors and senior people what they found out, etc. Facts like "salaries have no gone up for a decade" looks bad and makes law firms look desperate. And if firms are desperate for business, then clients may start to think they can start negotiating down the hourly billing rate. They can refuse to pay for juniors. They can do all the sort of shit that you could do to a desperate firm.jbagelboy wrote:more than the actual numbers, the notion that salaries are not stagnant and that there's room for growth in compensation could impact people's decision in going to law school. If you're a financial analyst, a mid-tier strategy consultant, at a marketing company or coming off a decent MA degree, in 2010-2012 you probably considered law school and decided to put it off or look the other way if you were paying attention and did your homework. Three years later, if we see bonuses and then base salaries going up, I actually do think that momentum could impact ex ante decision making in the aggregate for some people in the work force and even college seniors debating career choices.
I hate to think of choosing a graduate program or career based so derivatively on income, but it's undeniably a factor; more pertinently, it's also what salary increases represent: opportunity, demand, ect. So I do think there's at least an indirect incentive for firms to adjust compensation to draw people into law school.
Maybe I'm talking about of my ass. But surely the doom and gloom of the legal industry puts downward pressure on prices. One way for the elite firms to differentiate themselves may be to start paying more and create a two-tier big law industry - the newer normal - as a way to brand themselves as above the gloom. I'm just a student so what do I know though.
You pretend as if this whole supply and demand curve is only relevant for law graduates looking for jobs. People rightfully argue that when loads of law students are desperate to get the few good jobs, firms can do whatever the fuck they want. Well if the news and all the public facts show that plenty of law firms are not doing well (using lack of salary raises and bonuses as a proxy for their hidden financials), then perhaps clients will feel they can get away with more. Would law firms put up with clients saying they won't pay for juniors if the law firms were so busy that they could say "fuck you" and go work on another multi-billion dollar deal in a heartbeat? Probably not. But clients know they can get away with more bc they know the legal market is not as robust as before. Supply and demand. The smaller classes, smaller bonuses, pay raise freezes, etc are all economic signs of this (even if PPP remains strong). Some firms are obviously exceptions. That's the base of my "argument" and because it is so speculative I'm not sold on it.
The part about raising salaries to combat this perception would be even shakier and that was not my argument at all. Hell, I didn't even claim that this was something compensation committees considered. Instead it was just some fun ways to muse about strategy going forward for firms. From where I'm at, it seems a lot of the premiums that Big Law firms charge has more to do with IMAGE/brand than actual substance (for example, the average hourly a 2nd year DPW associate charges is higher than many firms lower down the chain). Thus I was thinking of ways to possibly change the narrative of law firms that clients hear for the most elite firms. It is very possible they don't need it though.
Congrats on being terrible at seeing the issues. I would refuse to pay you too.
- nothingtosee
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 12:08 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
So what did Texas firms do for bonuses? Wondering about both teas players like bb and v&e and Weil, Kirkland etc
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 2014 Biglaw Bonus Thread
http://abovethelaw.com/2015/01/associat ... -in-texas/nothingtosee wrote:So what did Texas firms do for bonuses? Wondering about both teas players like bb and v&e and Weil, Kirkland etc
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login