Hey guys,
Is there really a difference between corporate M&A training from say a biglaw V100 firm vs a regional biglaw firm?
I've heard people say that regional biglaw firms have more "hands" on work that involves more substantive drafting earlier on in your career vs say a V100 firm. Has anyone been to both types of firms?
Thanks
Difference in training between regional big law and V100 ? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428552
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
lonerider
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:14 pm
Re: Difference in training between regional big law and V100 ?
Name the firms otherwise this is too general to give a useful answer.
