It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
With OCI around the corner, and all the recent instructive bashing of private sector work, I'd love to know TLS thinks the "best" firms are (among 100+ firms, since we won't all know the super regional ones) - suppose you could choose - or do it all over again - where would you work? Consider QoL, salary, career advancement, ect. (Obviously many of us will be fortunate to have *a* job, but humor us incoming 2L's).
Also feel free to mention where you definitely would not work/firms to steer clear of (the worst).
Or if you just want to talk about the plus/minus of your own firm, that's great too. Just please come up with something more creative than Vault when justifying choices!
Also feel free to mention where you definitely would not work/firms to steer clear of (the worst).
Or if you just want to talk about the plus/minus of your own firm, that's great too. Just please come up with something more creative than Vault when justifying choices!
- jbiresq
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:52 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
This thread will be a bunch of people posting about how Firm A is a sweat shop and then a bunch of others posting about how Firm A is an amazing place and everyone is happy.
OP just focus on getting an offer and then you can start thinking about which place has the nicer people.
OP just focus on getting an offer and then you can start thinking about which place has the nicer people.
- brotherdarkness
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
.
Last edited by brotherdarkness on Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Tanicius
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
/end threadbrotherdarkness wrote:A lot of this is going to be subjective, too. What suits one person may not suit another; you can't really say that any one firm is "great."
Some people actually don't want to work Wachtell even if they get the offer there. Surprise surprise, it depends.
- cookiejar1
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:07 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
How about sharing random tidbits about firms that you wouldn't otherwise get from Vault/Chambers-Associate (e.g. Jenner is liberal!)?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- brotherdarkness
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
.
Last edited by brotherdarkness on Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
I mean, this is totally fair and naturally it's a subjective exercise, but people could still lend their impressions. A lot of the practicing attorneys on this site complain about their work, and sure it's for good reason, but if they could have done something differently or gone to a different firm that advice could be valuable.brotherdarkness wrote:A lot of this is going to be subjective, too. What suits one person may not suit another; you can't really say that any one firm is "great."
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:55 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
I'm completely on board with this (although I just finished 1L, too).cookiejar1 wrote:How about sharing random tidbits about firms that you wouldn't otherwise get from Vault/Chambers-Associate (e.g. Jenner is liberal!)?
I keep hearing about the need to choose a firm based on culture and fit, but the problem's that I have no way of gauging that before I summer there, at which point I've already locked myself into the firm (no way of repeating OCI, etc.).
I know impressions are subjective, but surely there are a few things that can be passed on. If you're a more subdued person who goes out occasionally but not often and X firm works great for you, I'd love to know that, etc.
Anything at all helps!
-
- Posts: 428130
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
That's why I didn't get a CB.brotherdarkness wrote:If you can't bench two plates, you won't get a CB from Latham.
- pertristis
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:29 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Whoops, that wasn't supposed to be an anon.Anonymous User wrote:That's why I didn't get a CB.brotherdarkness wrote:If you can't bench two plates, you won't get a CB from Latham.
-
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:33 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Just curious, how many offers are you planning to get? Which firms are you expecting will give you an offer?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Me? Would be happy with one offer but the bid list stage over the next month or so both determines and precedes what firms we could even net offers from. Moreover, why so serious?NYSprague wrote:Just curious, how many offers are you planning to get? Which firms are you expecting will give you an offer?
-
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:33 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
I was asking generally. I think if you want answers you need to specify firms and perhaps even practice groups. And, really, are you going to use anonymous anecdotes to make your bid list?jbagelboy wrote:Me? Would be happy with one offer but the bid list stage over the next month or so both determines and precedes what firms we could even net offers from. Moreover, why so serious?NYSprague wrote:Just curious, how many offers are you planning to get? Which firms are you expecting will give you an offer?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:55 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
It's not an end-all, but information helps. Nobody can plan on having a spectrum of choices but small, candid bits about a firm and what a person did in a practice group there aren't useless information, either.NYSprague wrote:I was asking generally. I think if you want answers you need to specify firms and perhaps even practice groups. And, really, are you going to use anonymous anecdotes to make your bid list?jbagelboy wrote:Me? Would be happy with one offer but the bid list stage over the next month or so both determines and precedes what firms we could even net offers from. Moreover, why so serious?NYSprague wrote:Just curious, how many offers are you planning to get? Which firms are you expecting will give you an offer?
There are things way more off-topic on this forum than someone's personal experience at their law firm. I don't think this is worth discouraging.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 8:07 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
.
Last edited by brazleton on Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
This, and then some. Law students tend to view firms as unitary, but they are not. You could work for the objectively most kind, nice, kumbaya singing firm, but if the partner you work with all the time is the one asshole there you'll still be miserable.NYSprague wrote:I was asking generally. I think if you want answers you need to specify firms and perhaps even practice groups. And, really, are you going to use anonymous anecdotes to make your bid list?jbagelboy wrote:Me? Would be happy with one offer but the bid list stage over the next month or so both determines and precedes what firms we could even net offers from. Moreover, why so serious?NYSprague wrote:Just curious, how many offers are you planning to get? Which firms are you expecting will give you an offer?
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Guys just do a search for [firm name] + culture
There are also just general 'culture' threads where people have talked about this stuff before
HTH
There are also just general 'culture' threads where people have talked about this stuff before
HTH
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
But if you get an offer from Dickstein Shapiro I would advise accepting on the spot and cancelling all your other callbacks
HTH
HTH
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Our bidding process started up today in early stages, so I understand your sentiment. Though I echo the fact that some people will say great things about a firm and others terrible things. From what I understand, it largely depends on practice group/ assigning partner. Someone could be on a big case for 9 months in a small team and love it. Others could hate it.
I still like to hear anecdotal tales, though.
I still like to hear anecdotal tales, though.
-
- Posts: 428130
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Best: Munger, Tolles & Olson, hands down. I could pick pretty much any firm I wanted (top of the class at HYS) and I picked MTO and another firm that is higher ranked on Vault and split my summer. Summered there in the past 3 years and am clerking now but I will most likely return after my clerkship. Extremely high level work and good quality of life (relatively speaking, of course).
Only downsides are that it is difficult to get hired there and they are mostly litigation focused.
Only downsides are that it is difficult to get hired there and they are mostly litigation focused.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
What practice group were you in? Anything else you can share on MTO? I haven't heard about them before.Anonymous User wrote:Best: Munger, Tolles & Olson, hands down. I could pick pretty much any firm I wanted (top of the class at HYS) and I picked MTO and another firm that is higher ranked on Vault and split my summer. Summered there in the past 3 years and am clerking now but I will most likely return after my clerkship. Extremely high level work and good quality of life (relatively speaking, of course).
Last edited by toothbrush on Fri Jun 06, 2014 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428130
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
I did various types of litigation (notably, a cool entertainment law case). They don't have rigid practice groups and I did a bunch of different types of litigation assignments. Yes, they aren't as well known as some other firms and fly under the radar a little bit (maybe because they only have offices in California and many people want to practice on the east coast). They have had 3 partners confirmed to the 9th Circuit in the past few years, too.toothbrush wrote:What practice group were you in? Anything else you can share on MTO? I haven't heard about them before.Anonymous User wrote:Best: Munger, Tolles & Olson, hands down. I could pick pretty much any firm I wanted (top of the class at HYS) and I picked MTO and another firm that is higher ranked on Vault and split my summer. Summered there in the past 3 years and am clerking now but I will most likely return after my clerkship. Extremely high level work and good quality of life (relatively speaking, of course).
I'm happy to share more information/opinions. Do you have any specific questions?
Edit: To the degree that there is a correlation between being "family friendly" and having a higher quality of life, this link might be of interest: http://abovethelaw.com/2014/04/the-top- ... irms-2014/
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Anon: thanks for your comments. We have one for MTO.
Do you recommend splitting? How did you facilitate that - directly after OCI, or when you had two offers in hand?
Do you recommend splitting? How did you facilitate that - directly after OCI, or when you had two offers in hand?
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
The short version of this thread: work life is much better pretty much anywhere outside of NYC. Problem is, outside of NYC means either lower offer rates and less $ (secondary market) or insanely competitive (DC, CA).
-
- Posts: 428130
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: It was the Best of firms, it was the Worst of firms
Yes, I recommend splitting. First, off it hedges your bets. Though I'm sure I didn't really have to worry about it, I rested a little easier knowing that if I got no-offered from one firm I still had the other firm to receive an offer from (and I picked a firm that historically gives out 100% offers too). Also, if you dislike one of your firms unexpectedly you can still go to the other and not be stuck with either 3L OCI or lateraling as an associate. Second, it gives you a point of comparison. Though biglaw firms are probably more similar than different, there are still material differences between them in culture, practice areas, etc. It's useful to actually get experience in two different firms.jbagelboy wrote:Anon: thanks for your comments. We have one for MTO.
Do you recommend splitting? How did you facilitate that - directly after OCI, or when you had two offers in hand?
I facilitated that only when I had two offers in hand, though I'm pretty sure the topic of splitting came up organically during OCI and callbacks with both firms. MTO actually is pretty easy to split with and they encourage it (subject to some restrictions).
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login