Help with law school recruiter problem

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
daryldixon
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby daryldixon » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:21 pm

Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...

I don't believe you.

User avatar
Mce252
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:43 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby Mce252 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:24 pm

daryldixon wrote:
Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...

I don't believe you.


That's okay. A mod will take away the anonymity from my previous posts soon enough, I'd imagine. Or I could just edit the first post to say "THIS IS A TROLL." With that, see first post.

User avatar
thesealocust
Posts: 8441
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby thesealocust » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:27 pm

Why on earth would you out yourself if it was completely made up? There are no tracks to bury if it's (a) totally false and (b) a post made by "anonymous user." The only conceivable motivation here... is COVERING UP THE REAL SCANDAL~

User avatar
Ron Mexico
Posts: 13447
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:32 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby Ron Mexico » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:28 pm

LOL @ ATL for reporting on TLS flames. Way to go guys, keep up the great work.

User avatar
Mce252
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:43 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby Mce252 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:30 pm

thesealocust wrote:Why on earth would you out yourself if it was completely made up? There are no tracks to bury if it's (a) totally false and (b) a post made by "anonymous user." The only conceivable motivation here... is COVERING UP THE REAL SCANDAL~


I have no tracks to bury. If that had actually happened, in the firms I've worked for, everyone would probably already know by now anyway.

I mean, really, she shattered my windshield? How fast does that go around a law school and to associates at the firm? 4 hours?

User avatar
mephistopheles
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby mephistopheles » Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:38 pm

almost just convincing enough...

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22773
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:08 pm

Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...

Okay, you're banned.

TheUltimateTroll
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:13 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby TheUltimateTroll » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:20 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
Mce252 wrote:This is OP. I had to remove the anonymity to declare that this was a troll. I figured I was going to be revealed one way or another by admitting it. Ban me--I really don't care.

See my other troll from that afternoon: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=219144.

I'm satisfied with the result but I'm going for CNN.com next week, if I can still access TLS...

Okay, you're banned.


All I get is one week? How lenient of you. Is there a three strike policy on trolling? Here is another one from this summer that I enjoyed personally... http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=214027

helfer snooterbagon
Posts: 203
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:04 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby helfer snooterbagon » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:38 pm

What is going on here? These were some quality trolls, I don't think anyone suspected!

daryldixon
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby daryldixon » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:32 pm

TheUltimateTroll wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=214027

Bro you are still amateur status. Anonymous trolls are not impressive.

daryldixon
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:55 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby daryldixon » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:33 pm

helfer snooterbagon wrote:What is going on here? These were some quality trolls, I don't think anyone suspected!

Is this the same dude?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273050
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:48 pm

n/m

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22773
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:23 pm

helfer snooterbagon wrote:What is going on here? These were some quality trolls, I don't think anyone suspected!

I for one am shocked, SHOCKED to find that the referenced posts were untrue. But since the OP/Mce252 felt the need to create an alt to come back and tell us this, he can be banned for longer.

User avatar
Ron Mexico
Posts: 13447
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:32 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby Ron Mexico » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:33 pm

but still LOL @ that shitrag ATL for writing an article on a clear flame.

User avatar
hephaestus
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby hephaestus » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:35 pm

Ron Mexico wrote:but still LOL @ that shitrag ATL for writing an article on a clear flame.

Seriously. This one wasn't even that believable.

User avatar
hichvichwoh
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:21 am

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby hichvichwoh » Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:37 pm

Troll should get a medal for (further) discrediting ATL.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23644
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Help with law school recruiter problem

Postby chup » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:57 am

Ron Mexico wrote:LOL @ ATL for reporting on TLS flames. Way to go guys, keep up the great work.

Journamalism!




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.