N/a

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which firm is best for substantive experience and safe for the future?

Kasowitz
4
16%
Pryor Cashman
2
8%
Willkie Farr (NY)
17
68%
Winston & Strawn (NY)
0
No votes
Orrick (NY)
2
8%
 
Total votes: 25

suoicerp
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm

N/a

Postby suoicerp » Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:29 pm

no longer relevant
Last edited by suoicerp on Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:11 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
brotherdarkness
Posts: 3254
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm

Re: Completely ambivalent

Postby brotherdarkness » Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:30 pm

.
Last edited by brotherdarkness on Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:27 pm

are you seriously considering under market paying firms? (pryor) if so, why?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:43 pm

What are your interests?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:53 pm

bump. this is relevant to my interests

suoicerp
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby suoicerp » Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:51 pm

n/a
Last edited by suoicerp on Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:30 am

I'm a little surprised about why Orrick isn't getting more love. anyone wanna share thoughts?

VeritasVlad
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:37 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby VeritasVlad » Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:41 am

Orrick is great culturally. More chill than most of biglaw for sure.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:23 pm

There is something grimy about kasowitz.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:51 pm

I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.

Just a good firm that gets high quality work.

suoicerp
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby suoicerp » Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:39 pm

n/a
Last edited by suoicerp on Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:45 pm

suoicerp wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.

Just a good firm that gets high quality work.


Well they are now out of the picture because they called me and told me to accept elsewhere.


What?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273128
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:57 pm

Winston should not be picked by anyone who has an alternative option that pays market.

suoicerp
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby suoicerp » Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:02 pm

n/a
Last edited by suoicerp on Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

NYstate
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Postby NYstate » Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:32 pm

suoicerp wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.

Just a good firm that gets high quality work.


Well they are now out of the picture because they called me and told me to accept elsewhere.

It's a good sign they warned you. I would strongly suggest people who have offers there to go elsewhere. They may end up having to no offer people if they aren't going to have room for everyone. So smart move on your part.

Of these firms, stay away from Winston; I don't know much other than Wilkie seems like a decent place to work.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.