Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY)?

Simpson Thacher
16
67%
Skadden
8
33%
 
Total votes: 24

Anonymous User
Posts: 273139
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:20 am

Interest in litigation, particularly antitrust and white collar. Hoping to end up AUSA or FTC down the line. Liked most people at both offices during CBs and could see working at either firm.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273139
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:02 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Interest in litigation, particularly antitrust and white collar. Hoping to end up AUSA or FTC down the line. Liked most people at both offices during CBs and could see working at either firm.


How is STB winning this? OP wants lit.

KidStuddi
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm

Re: Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)

Postby KidStuddi » Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:43 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Interest in litigation, particularly antitrust and white collar. Hoping to end up AUSA or FTC down the line. Liked most people at both offices during CBs and could see working at either firm.


How is STB winning this? OP wants lit.


How many dead threads are you going to revise just to express your shock that people are unimpressed with Skadden (when compared to other V10s)?




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.