Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which should I pick?

Quinn
7
17%
Boies
15
36%
Kasowitz
3
7%
Keker
17
40%
 
Total votes: 42

Anonymous User
Posts: 310040
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:06 pm

Yes I should clarify that I'm a 2L and these are all SA offers. I'm aware that I'll need to clerk if I want a permanent position at Keker but was planning on applying for clerkships anyhow

JusticeJackson

Silver
Posts: 524
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am

Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

Postby JusticeJackson » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:10 pm

.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5410
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Quinn v. Boies v. Kasowitz v. smaller lit boutique

Postby Old Gregg » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:14 pm

Don't think that really changes things. Also, Keker repped HTC in HTC v. Apple.



Return to “Legal Employment�

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.