Generally, how do employers view the following? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Generally, how do employers view the following?
how do employers view the following? and could someone rank them?
1. Law review write-on (not grade-on; we all know they love people with high grades)
2. Moot court participant
3. Mock trial participant
4. Moot court champion
5. Mock trial champion
6. Moot court board
7. Mock trial board
8. Secondary journal (not editor)
9. Secondary journal (editor)
1. Law review write-on (not grade-on; we all know they love people with high grades)
2. Moot court participant
3. Mock trial participant
4. Moot court champion
5. Mock trial champion
6. Moot court board
7. Mock trial board
8. Secondary journal (not editor)
9. Secondary journal (editor)
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:37 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
I'd say Law Review --> Moot Court --> Secondary Journal.Anonymous User wrote:how do employers view the following? and could someone rank them?
1. Law review write-on (not grade-on; we all know they love people with high grades)
2. Moot court participant
3. Mock trial participant
4. Moot court champion
5. Mock trial champion
6. Moot court board
7. Mock trial board
8. Secondary journal (not editor)
9. Secondary journal (editor)
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
I think it depends on the employer. If you're applying for PD jobs, moot court and mock trial are going to mean a lot more than a secondary journal. If you're applying for clerkships, the reverse is probably true.
- gdane
- Posts: 14023
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:41 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
This is a really stupid question. But, I'll play.
What kind of employer? If you're looking at a firm then LR is one of the best things you can have on your resume. If you're looking at a DA or PD, Moot Court is one of the best things you can have on your resume. The rest of the stuff that you're asking to get ranked is really stupid and pointless to rank.
What kind of employer? If you're looking at a firm then LR is one of the best things you can have on your resume. If you're looking at a DA or PD, Moot Court is one of the best things you can have on your resume. The rest of the stuff that you're asking to get ranked is really stupid and pointless to rank.
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:37 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
how hard is it to get a PD job these days?Anonymous User wrote:I think it depends on the employer. If you're applying for PD jobs, moot court and mock trial are going to mean a lot more than a secondary journal. If you're applying for clerkships, the reverse is probably true.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Concur.Anonymous User wrote:I think it depends on the employer. If you're applying for PD jobs, moot court and mock trial are going to mean a lot more than a secondary journal. If you're applying for clerkships, the reverse is probably true.
- stuckinthemiddle
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:24 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Tagging this.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
I think it varies a little - where I went to school, the PD/DA seemed to like mock trial better than moot court. And sure, winning a competition looks a little better than just participating. But getting actual experience through interning or working in a clinic was way better than any of these things. I agree that if you're looking at firms, LR is better than the other stuff.gdane wrote:This is a really stupid question. But, I'll play.
What kind of employer? If you're looking at a firm then LR is one of the best things you can have on your resume. If you're looking at a DA or PD, Moot Court is one of the best things you can have on your resume. The rest of the stuff that you're asking to get ranked is really stupid and pointless to rank.
It is a stupid question, though.
Also,
Depends on where you are and what your qualifications are. Also, it helps if you complete the interview requirements.MoonDreamer wrote:how hard is it to get a PD job these days?
Last edited by A. Nony Mouse on Wed Jul 31, 2013 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
OP here. t-10 school, wrote onto law review, looking at biglaw jobs. I heard from rising 3L's that write-on's are basically worthless, so i want to know if that is true. I'm also considering some of the other options to go with the write-on
gdane, thank you for the obvious statement. please "play" elsewhere
gdane, thank you for the obvious statement. please "play" elsewhere
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
From my T20, if say it depends on the firm. Regional firms with strong ties to particular schools are more likely to be impressed by it (this is probably less true for you at a T10). But write-on is not a substitute for passable grades, it's just a nice advantage over similarly ranked students.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. t-10 school, wrote onto law review, looking at biglaw jobs. I heard from rising 3L's that write-on's are basically worthless, so i want to know if that is true. I'm also considering some of the other options to go with the write-on
gdane, thank you for the obvious statement. please "play" elsewhere
Bid according to your grades.
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:59 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
LR is a signaling device. Students on LR get good jobs because most of them have good grades. I don't think there's any unique experience you get on LR (vs. a secondary journal) that make you better situated for biglaw. So yeah, I think your friends are right—LR normally is a reflection of your grades; to the extent that it's not, it's less helpful.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. t-10 school, wrote onto law review, looking at biglaw jobs. I heard from rising 3L's that write-on's are basically worthless, so i want to know if that is true. I'm also considering some of the other options to go with the write-on
gdane, thank you for the obvious statement. please "play" elsewhere
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
well your rising 3Ls friends are wrong, and sound douchey to boot.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. t-10 school, wrote onto law review, looking at biglaw jobs. I heard from rising 3L's that write-on's are basically worthless, so i want to know if that is true. I'm also considering some of the other options to go with the write-on
gdane, thank you for the obvious statement. please "play" elsewhere
think about it--every student with a gpa above a certain point is going to have LR. thus, LR doesn't distinguish any student above that gpa threshold from any other student above that threshold.
on the other hand, a write-on has something that his gpa-peers don't--LR. if you're a firm and you are comparing two just-above median students, and one has LR and one doesn't, what are you gonna do?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Having LR isn't going to make you competitive at any firm where your GPA doesn't already make you competitive. That is why people say that LR isn't that big a deal for biglaw (whether it's write on or grade on). Sure, firms like it and it's going to be a nice thing to have, but you aren't going to be looking at any different firms than you would if you didn't have it and you likely won't be a ton more successful because of it. All of the other stuff is also pretty much irrelevant to biglaw because biglaw hires during summer/fall of 2L and the rest of what you listed are things that you get after that time period so you won't even have the option to have them on your resume while interviewing with biglaw.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. t-10 school, wrote onto law review, looking at biglaw jobs. I heard from rising 3L's that write-on's are basically worthless, so i want to know if that is true. I'm also considering some of the other options to go with the write-on
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Eh. I'm sure that LR gets factored in but it is going to be one of a whole host of factors. I doubt it's going to make a significant difference. Not sure that it's douchey if their assessment is generally correct (I assume they mean that having written on is worthless, not that the people who write on are worthless themselves).sundance95 wrote:well your rising 3Ls friends are wrong, and sound douchey to boot.
think about it--every student with a gpa above a certain point is going to have LR. thus, LR doesn't distinguish any student above that gpa threshold from any other student above that threshold.
on the other hand, a write-on has something that his gpa-peers don't--LR. if you're a firm and you are comparing two just-above median students, and one has LR and one doesn't, what are you gonna do?
-
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
I think this might make a difference of its a T14 LR. Those write-ons may get a boost. A T40 median student who writes on isn't going to see much of a boost. (An Iowa or American student who writes on is still fucked)
I'm biased, though
I'm biased, though
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
ah, if that's what they meant i obviously retract doucheybk187 wrote:Not sure that it's douchey if their assessment is generally correct (I assume they mean that having written on is worthless, not that the people who write on are worthless themselves).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
This is why so many law grads are struggling in the market. Every student places strong emphasis on academic work, but fails to realize that "real world" work experience matters more than anything. I delayed law school for a year to gain legal work experience in a law firm and it ultimately led to an SA position. Education reform in this country is a must.
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Lolz. Grades are probably 90%+ of hiring.Anonymous User wrote:This is why so many law grads are struggling in the market. Every student places strong emphasis on academic work, but fails to realize that "real world" work experience matters more than anything. I delayed law school for a year to gain legal work experience in a law firm and it ultimately led to an SA position. Education reform in this country is a must.
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Unfortunately, writing on to LR is not a magic bullet at OCI. It likely helps, but marginally - temper expectations.
At my T14, the people on my journal who clearly wrote on (i.e. their grades weren't in the top 1/3), seemed to have a rougher go of OCI than those on secondary journals with higher grades.
Still, it can't hurt - and any help, even a marginal boost, is useful. Just don't aim too high with firms: your targets are still the firms in your GPA range (look at your school's history). The difference is, you might have a little more success with those firms.
At my T14, the people on my journal who clearly wrote on (i.e. their grades weren't in the top 1/3), seemed to have a rougher go of OCI than those on secondary journals with higher grades.
Still, it can't hurt - and any help, even a marginal boost, is useful. Just don't aim too high with firms: your targets are still the firms in your GPA range (look at your school's history). The difference is, you might have a little more success with those firms.
-
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Confirming this. LR will maybe get you interviews at firms that would never talk to you, but if your grades are not good then the interview is just a face courtesy to help out an alum partner, firm-alum prof, or the school in general.msridiculous447 wrote:LR is a signaling device. Students on LR get good jobs because most of them have good grades. I don't think there's any unique experience you get on LR (vs. a secondary journal) that make you better situated for biglaw. So yeah, I think your friends are right—LR normally is a reflection of your grades; to the extent that it's not, it's less helpful.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. t-10 school, wrote onto law review, looking at biglaw jobs. I heard from rising 3L's that write-on's are basically worthless, so i want to know if that is true. I'm also considering some of the other options to go with the write-on
gdane, thank you for the obvious statement. please "play" elsewhere
LR in itself does nothing for you, unless you get EIC firms and employers really do not care... Especially if the other positions are confusingly similar (e.g., Assistant Editor, Associate Editor, Articles Editor) and no employer gives a damn enough to waste billable time browsing through some website to find your journal.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2013 11:54 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
This might be a bit tangential, but this is going to depend on the person you are interviewing with, as well as the firm. As someone who is practically minded and who conducts interviews (so far have only interviewed laterals, but would feel the same for a law student), I would care WAY more about the moot court/trial participation and awards. I presume you are going into litigation. Journal work is just not relevant to the work we do in litigation at a big firm - we need people who can research, write, and generally understands evidence and pre-trial procedure, trial procedure, and post-trial procedure.
This is not the traditional way of thinking though-I am sure a lot of firms and interviewers really value law review. I don't really know about the difference between grade-on and write-on. Get a sense of what your interviewer is focusing on with their questions. This will clue you in on how to handle the interview and what to focus on yourself.
This is not the traditional way of thinking though-I am sure a lot of firms and interviewers really value law review. I don't really know about the difference between grade-on and write-on. Get a sense of what your interviewer is focusing on with their questions. This will clue you in on how to handle the interview and what to focus on yourself.
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
OP here. Thanks a lot. I was wondering if I should do moot court as well.Anonymous Associate wrote:This might be a bit tangential, but this is going to depend on the person you are interviewing with, as well as the firm. As someone who is practically minded and who conducts interviews (so far have only interviewed laterals, but would feel the same for a law student), I would care WAY more about the moot court/trial participation and awards. I presume you are going into litigation. Journal work is just not relevant to the work we do in litigation at a big firm - we need people who can research, write, and generally understands evidence and pre-trial procedure, trial procedure, and post-trial procedure.
This is not the traditional way of thinking though-I am sure a lot of firms and interviewers really value law review. I don't really know about the difference between grade-on and write-on. Get a sense of what your interviewer is focusing on with their questions. This will clue you in on how to handle the interview and what to focus on yourself.
-
- Posts: 428474
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
Anonymous User wrote:how do employers view the following? and could someone rank them?
1. Law review write-on (not grade-on; we all know they love people with high grades)
2. Moot court participant
3. Mock trial participant
4. Moot court champion
5. Mock trial champion
6. Moot court board
7. Mock trial board
8. Secondary journal (not editor)
9. Secondary journal (editor)
Number of dashes denotes level of separation between things in my opinion:
Law Review of any kind ----->
Quality Secondary Journal (respected in some field) ->
Moot Court Champion at a decent size competition ->
Honors Moot Court Board (earn it through competition, etc) ->
Moot Court Board via application interview (many schools do this) --------------->
Moot Court participant
I don't think anybody gives a shit about secondary journal editors who aren't editor in chief. Nobody gives a shit about shitty secondary journals (contrast with respected secondary journals). Nobody gives a shit about mock trial unless they were participants themselves, which is just a lucky extracurricular bonus that could come from things like hobbies. If you are going to devote your time to something then get on the flagship law review if you possibly can. If you can't, be editor in chief of a secondary. If you can't do that, go WIN some competitions. That will at least give you a winner narrative.
If you aren't competitive for biglaw then mock trial and a good knowledge of pre-trial litigation procedures will go a long way with smaller litigation firms. That is job-skill stuff.
The truth is that flagship law review + grades is 95% of the battle in getting an interview. After you get an interview it is just all you from there. I came through my job search very successful but also very cynical.
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Generally, how do employers view the following?
There you go.Anonymous User wrote:Nobody gives a shit aboutshittysecondary journals(contrast with respected secondary journals). Nobody gives a shit about mock trial unlessthey were participants themselves, which is just a lucky extracurricular bonus that could come from things like hobbiesyou're gunning for prosecuting or PD work.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login