Plaintiffs firms SF Forum

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:29 am

What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?

anon168 · Post by **anon168** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:08 am

Anonymous User wrote:What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?

Lieff, Robbins Geller, Cochett -- for plaintiffs' side securities work

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:33 am

anon168 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?
Lieff, Robbins Geller, Cochett -- for plaintiffs' side securities work

These are the firms that come to mind immediately for me, too, when I think "SF Plaintiffs" but I know Lieff is highly grades selective and I'm pretty sure the other two are as well. It's worth giving these guys a shot but I'd also try to extend your search to smaller firms. Unfortunately I don't know the names of those firms, but maybe good places to look would be SF legal publications. This document has a decent list, but I have this weird recollection that some of those firms aren't really plaintiffs firms. Worth looking at though:

--LinkRemoved--

anon168 · Post by **anon168** » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:04 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
anon168 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?
Lieff, Robbins Geller, Cochett -- for plaintiffs' side securities work
These are the firms that come to mind immediately for me, too, when I think "SF Plaintiffs" but I know Lieff is highly grades selective and I'm pretty sure the other two are as well. It's worth giving these guys a shot but I'd also try to extend your search to smaller firms. Unfortunately I don't know the names of those firms, but maybe good places to look would be SF legal publications. This document has a decent list, but I have this weird recollection that some of those firms aren't really plaintiffs firms. Worth looking at though:

--LinkRemoved--

That's not exactly accurate.

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:39 pm

curious about this as well. i'm NYC biglaw looking to lateral to SF plaintiffs side.

anon168 can you elaborate?

anon168 · Post by **anon168** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:09 pm

Anonymous User wrote:curious about this as well. i'm NYC biglaw looking to lateral to SF plaintiffs side.

anon168 can you elaborate?

Cotchett is not grade conscious. Nor is Robbins Geller. Leiff maybe in comparison to Cotchett and Robbins Geller, but in practice it's not that hard to get a job there -- assuming they are hiring, which is the biggest barrier with them.

The only real grade conscious firm on the "left" side of the V in SF is probably Altshuler Berzon.

Feel free to PM if you want more info.

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:21 pm

anon168 wrote: Cotchett is not grade conscious. Nor is Robbins Geller. Leiff maybe in comparison to Cotchett and Robbins Geller, but in practice it's not that hard to get a job there -- assuming they are hiring, which is the biggest barrier with them.

Anon who said they were grade conscious.

You're right re Cotchett and RG, thanks for correcting me. I think you underestimate the difficulty of getting a job at Lieff - not everybody has your (substantial) experience, 168.

Nammertat · Post by **Nammertat** » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:41 pm

Dechert also does a lot of plaintiff work in CA... and a fair amount of troll.

Plaintiffs firms SF Forum

Plaintiffs firms SF

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Register for access!