Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
That's disconcerting...
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Notice the conspicuous use of the phrase "new normal"
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
What a bullshit excuse. They're laying off staff to increase PPP. Greedy fucking boomers
-
- Posts: 427954
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
http://www.americanlawyer.com/PubArticl ... 0524105951
PPP down and Revenue Flat is a recipe for this.
PPP down and Revenue Flat is a recipe for this.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbiresq
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:52 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
"Right-sizing" is easily my least favorite phrase in the English language.
-
- Posts: 427954
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Have incoming Weil associates received starting stipends and start dates?
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
And 7% of associates.guano wrote:What a bullshit excuse. They're laying off staff to increase PPP. Greedy fucking boomers
- legalese_retard
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:14 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Bad timing on Weil's part. Don't firms try to avoid news like these when they have summer associates?
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Not to mention with OCI loominglegalese_retard wrote:Bad timing on Weil's part. Don't firms try to avoid news like these when they have summer associates?
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Summer's slow2014 wrote:Not to mention with OCI loominglegalese_retard wrote:Bad timing on Weil's part. Don't firms try to avoid news like these when they have summer associates?
You don't want to conduct layoffs when stuff is tryin to get finished
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:17 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
And yet so many of you still want BigLaw.
-
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:29 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
shutterbug wrote:And yet so many of you still want BigLaw.
I think most want big law for the salary to be able to pay off the massive amount of debt, then maybe move inhouse if not partnership track....I could be wrong, but that seems to be the consensus.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Explain why the possibility of layoff would make you not want to work at a large firmshutterbug wrote:And yet so many of you still want BigLaw.
-
- Posts: 427954
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
This is surprising. My best (relatively uninformed, random) guess is it has to do with the end of Lehman work (for which I'd imagine they staffed up majorly) and generally slow M&A markets.
I'm at a peer firm and lots (maybe most?) of our practices are brutally, relentlessly busy. Litigation is fast, most non-M&A corporate practices are slammed, etc. so I definitely didn't see this coming.
Weil was always in a somewhat shakier position, but I had assumed things had righted.
Any word on what class year(s) are affected? This isn't a "lathaming" is it?
I'm at a peer firm and lots (maybe most?) of our practices are brutally, relentlessly busy. Litigation is fast, most non-M&A corporate practices are slammed, etc. so I definitely didn't see this coming.
Weil was always in a somewhat shakier position, but I had assumed things had righted.
Any word on what class year(s) are affected? This isn't a "lathaming" is it?
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:58 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Am I reading the memo correct in that the layoffs will be in Houston and Boston but not NY?
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
They have too many people to do the work. Obviously the firm isn't worried about recruiting. Part of me thinks that we will see this happening at more firms whose corporate practices aren't recovering and aren't expected to recover.
There is nothing in this article that doesn't reflect the market realities that have been discussed constantly here.
We all know that most firms do stealth layoffs continuously. At least these people are being let go with 6 months of a large salary and a good excuse for losing their job. Being stealthed is much worse because you can't explain why you were fired.
There is nothing in this article that doesn't reflect the market realities that have been discussed constantly here.
We all know that most firms do stealth layoffs continuously. At least these people are being let go with 6 months of a large salary and a good excuse for losing their job. Being stealthed is much worse because you can't explain why you were fired.
Last edited by NYstate on Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
rad lulz wrote:Explain why the possibility of layoff would make you not want to work at a large firmshutterbug wrote:And yet so many of you still want BigLaw.
Not getting another job?
All these 0Ls are making their budgets for their hypothetical future biglaw jobs as justification for going into huge debt from law school. They aren't calculating the risk of losing that job or not getting a job after leaving biglaw.
Last edited by NYstate on Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 427954
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Is Weil still worth bidding after this? They already had the triple-defferals going on before. I just wonder how many summers they'll actually take on given these layoffs.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Your criticism is a really good criticism. Entirely fairNYstate wrote:rad lulz wrote:Explain why the possibility of layoff would make you not want to work at a large firmshutterbug wrote:And yet so many of you still want BigLaw.
Not getting another job?
All these 0Ls are making their budgets for their hypothetical future biglaw jobs as justification for going into huge debt from law school. They aren't calculating the risk of losing that job or not getting a job after leaving biglaw.
But I don't know how much this really says "Oh big firms do layoffs, hence I don't want to work at any big firm"
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
No this doesn't seem to be a lathaming. I think you are correct that after Latham there is too much staff. Announcing partner salary cut is another major move. They are working to be a sustainable firm.Anonymous User wrote:This is surprising. My best (relatively uninformed, random) guess is it has to do with the end of Lehman work (for which I'd imagine they staffed up majorly) and generally slow M&A markets.
I'm at a peer firm and lots (maybe most?) of our practices are brutally, relentlessly busy. Litigation is fast, most non-M&A corporate practices are slammed, etc. so I definitely didn't see this coming.
Weil was always in a somewhat shakier position, but I had assumed things had righted.
Any word on what class year(s) are affected? This isn't a "lathaming" is it?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:51 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
If you're hell-bent on Restructuring, absolutely. If you're unsure, probably still a yes. If you have another job choice when offers start rolling out, that's when you decide to pass on Weil. But an offer from Weil > zero offers at OCI.Anonymous User wrote:Is Weil still worth bidding after this? They already had the triple-defferals going on before. I just wonder how many summers they'll actually take on given these layoffs.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
If you have a realistic shot at better options in the bidding, then do those. But if it's either Weil or nothing in hand...Anonymous User wrote:Is Weil still worth bidding after this? They already had the triple-defferals going on before. I just wonder how many summers they'll actually take on given these layoffs.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
"Latham-ing" is not just the laying off of associates, but the laying off of first years..NYstate wrote:No this doesn't seem to be a lathaming. I think you are correct that after Latham there is too much staff. Announcing partner salary cut is another major move. They are working to be a sustainable firm.Anonymous User wrote:This is surprising. My best (relatively uninformed, random) guess is it has to do with the end of Lehman work (for which I'd imagine they staffed up majorly) and generally slow M&A markets.
I'm at a peer firm and lots (maybe most?) of our practices are brutally, relentlessly busy. Litigation is fast, most non-M&A corporate practices are slammed, etc. so I definitely didn't see this coming.
Weil was always in a somewhat shakier position, but I had assumed things had righted.
Any word on what class year(s) are affected? This isn't a "lathaming" is it?
-
- Posts: 427954
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Layoffs back? Weil cutting associates
Seems to be the case that they avoided the harshness of 2008 economy because of their restructuring work. They're just facing the same problems that all the other firms did, just a few years later, because that work is drying up.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login