Columbia Law School EIP 2013

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:46 am

Any idea when other journal offers go out? Shortly after LR?

I changed my phone number, do journals also email out offers?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:53 am

Anonymous User wrote:Has anyone at Columbia heard back from Quinn Emmanuel yet?

-Vespasian


I have a callback if that is what you're asking.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:56 am

CLR calls have started to go out

lspa2015
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 2:28 pm

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby lspa2015 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:CLR calls have started to go out

Anyone have any idea when the calls for the other journals go out? Also, do they only notify by phone or do they also send emails?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:07 pm

Another 'critique my bidlist'

I have a straight B+ average, not on LR, one year of WE (nothing noteworthy), consider myself to be a good interviewer.


1. Proskauer Rose
2. Shearman
3. Ropes & Gray
4. Schulte Roth & Zabel
5. Kirkland & Ellis
6. Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy
7. Weil
8. Arnold Porter
9. MoFo
10. Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
11. Hughes Hubbard & Reed
12. Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft
13. Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman
14. Latham & Watkins
15. Sidley Austin
16. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
17. White & Case
18. Stroock Stroock & Lavan
19. Jones Day
20. Clifford
21. Morgan Lewis & Bockius
22. Cahill Gordon & Reindel
23. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
24. Winston & Strawn
25. Debevoise
26. Brown Rudnick
27. Akin Gump
28. Paul Hastings
29. Paul Weiss
30. O'Melveny & [deleted]

Thanks for your help
Last edited by Anonymous User on Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:23 pm

Lol Dewey? You do know they don't exist right?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:29 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Lol Dewey? You do know they don't exist right?


I see someone has been messing with my google doc. LOL

fixed

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:03 am

Anonymous User wrote:Another 'critique my bidlist'

I have a straight B+ average, not on LR, one year of WE (nothing noteworthy), consider myself to be a good interviewer.


1. Proskauer Rose
2. Shearman
3. Ropes & Gray
4. Schulte Roth & Zabel
5. Kirkland & Ellis
6. Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy
7. Weil
8. Arnold Porter
9. MoFo
10. Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
11. Hughes Hubbard & Reed
12. Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft
13. Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman
14. Latham & Watkins
15. Sidley Austin
16. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
17. White & Case
18. Stroock Stroock & Lavan
19. Jones Day
20. Clifford
21. Morgan Lewis & Bockius
22. Cahill Gordon & Reindel
23. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
24. Winston & Strawn
25. Debevoise
26. Brown Rudnick
27. Akin Gump
28. Paul Hastings
29. Paul Weiss
30. O'Melveny & [deleted]

Thanks for your help


In order to get interviews with Sidley, White & Case, Jones Day, or Paul Hastings, you'll probably need to move these firms up on your list. Same goes for Cleary/Debevoise/Paul Weiss - but I wouldn't move these up because they are all very grade-conscious. You can, however, probably move Hughes Hubbard & Cadwalader down. Also, I would think about maybe bumping Kirkland up a spot or two because they were very popular last year and they also reduced the number of their interview slots - you may get them at 5 or you may not.

- Roger Sterling

Torg20
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:50 pm

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Torg20 » Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:45 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
aceofspades8412 wrote:FYI everyone, I think I saw a little earlier that someone said they wanted a distribution of where people bid on certain firms (or maybe it was just me) ... Career Services has a list with data on the median bid # for those who got screeners at the firms and the highest (lowest) bid that successfully got a screener interview. Last years blog on EIP had some anecdotal numbers for a few firms, but Career Services has the actual numbers on every firm. They aren't releasing it to us, but if you go in, they'll review your list to see if you should move some firms around. So after talking with Career Services, this is my final list, pending a 30th firm (probably):

1 Gibson Dunn
2 Skadden
3 Sidley Austin
4 Latham & Watkins
5 Shearman & Sterling
6 Ropes and Gray
7 Debevoise
8 Sullivan & Cromwell
9 Paul Weiss
10 Weil
11 Freshfields
12 Cleary
13 Davis Polk
14 Simpson Thacher
15 Morrison & Foerster
16 Willkie
17 Schulte Roth
18 Dechert
19 Fried Frank
20 Cravath
21 Akin Gump
22 Wachtell
23 Cadwalader
24 Stroock & Stroock
25 O'Melveny
26 Cahill
27 Morgan Lewis
28 Cooley
29 Bracewell & Guiliani
30


Did they tell you to move Simpson and DPW down at all based on their data?


Any insight on positioning for Cleary or S&C from their information? My only data points are that someone missed Cleary at 16 and someone missed S&C at 15 last year. Would love to hear any additional info.

- Roger Sterling

I know you said you weren't really focusing on grades for this list, but could someone clarify for roughly what GPA range this list would be appropriate?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:58 pm

Torg20 wrote:I know you said you weren't really focusing on grades for this list, but could someone clarify for roughly what GPA range this list would be appropriate?


Based on the composition of the first 15 or so firms, certainly seems like mid stone at least. I don't see too many firms up there with a stone/kent rate below 50% (and most much higher). Would seem like a risky bidlist for anyone below a 3.6 or so.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:59 pm

Long-time listener, first-time caller. I could really use help on my bid list; please let me know firms that need to be moved up/can be moved down, etc. I am a very low Stone scholar, secondary journal, not an URM, K-law school with legal work during summers (mostly government), probably average interviewer. Applying only in NY. Don't care about feedback saying, for instance, that I spelled names incorrectly.

1. Shearman
2. Kirkland & Ellis
3. Gibson Dunn
4. Skadden
5. Debevoise
6. Ropes & Gray
7. Cleary Gottlieb
8. Sidley Austin
9. White & Case
10. Jones Day
11. Milbank
12. Paul, Weiss
13. Akin Gump
14. Weil
15. Simpson Thacher
16. Davis Polk
17. Cahill
18. O’Melveny
19. K & L Gates
20. Winston & Strawn
21. Goodwin Procter
22. Kaye Scholer
23. Chadbourne
24. Covington
25. Schulte
26. Fried Frank
27. Cravath, Swain, & Moore
28. Hughes Hubbard
29. Stroock & Stroock
30. Brown Rudnick

Firms that I want to include, but am not sure I have room for (with reasons):
Paul Hastings (would replace 3): concerned about number of offers, honestly--vault ranking for spot it needs to be bid, and decreased interviews offered.
Latham (would replace 9): not sure about firm culture, handling of recession, and like White & Case.
Wilkie (would replace 10): Honestly, this firm's reception and reputation make it hard for me to not list...but with fewer interview spots, and fear of not getting an offer, I am considering strategically cutting it.
Cadawalder (would replace 12): I think this is right around where it needs to be bid. Would change it out for Paul, Weiss if I don't have a realistic shot at Paul.
Freshfields (would replace 14): Weil. Not sure how I feel about it; not sure where to bid it; thoughts welcome.

Anyway, sorry for the long post. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Good luck to us all!!

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:36 pm

3.24 GPA here again. Here's the list I came up with. Definitely some reaches in here and the ordering definitely needs work. I'd love to hear your feedback!

edit: i'm trying to do corporate in nyc. these are all nyc offices. also, i think this might have been too aggressive so i'm working on a toned down version

1 Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
2 Bingham McCutchen LLP 
3 Sidley Austin LLP 
4 Shearman & Sterling LLP 
5 Mayer Brown LLP 
6 Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP 
7 WilmerHale LLP 
8 Jones Day 
9 Clifford Chance US LLP 
10 Morrison & Foerster LLP 
11 Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP 
12 Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP 
13 Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP 
14 Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP 
15 Arnold & Porter LLP 
16 Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 
17 Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP 
18 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 
19 Hogan Lovells US LLP 
20 White & Case LLP 
21 Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 
22 Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP 
23 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 
24 Chadbourne & Parke LLP 
25 Allen & Overy LLP 
26 Baker & McKenzie LLP 
27 Dechert LLP 
28 Proskauer Rose LLP 
29 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 
30 Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 

-Liz Lemon
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

aceofspades8412
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:12 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby aceofspades8412 » Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:51 pm

Torg20 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
aceofspades8412 wrote:FYI everyone, I think I saw a little earlier that someone said they wanted a distribution of where people bid on certain firms (or maybe it was just me) ... Career Services has a list with data on the median bid # for those who got screeners at the firms and the highest (lowest) bid that successfully got a screener interview. Last years blog on EIP had some anecdotal numbers for a few firms, but Career Services has the actual numbers on every firm. They aren't releasing it to us, but if you go in, they'll review your list to see if you should move some firms around. So after talking with Career Services, this is my final list, pending a 30th firm (probably):

1 Gibson Dunn
2 Skadden
3 Sidley Austin
4 Latham & Watkins
5 Shearman & Sterling
6 Ropes and Gray
7 Debevoise
8 Sullivan & Cromwell
9 Paul Weiss
10 Weil
11 Freshfields
12 Cleary
13 Davis Polk
14 Simpson Thacher
15 Morrison & Foerster
16 Willkie
17 Schulte Roth
18 Dechert
19 Fried Frank
20 Cravath
21 Akin Gump
22 Wachtell
23 Cadwalader
24 Stroock & Stroock
25 O'Melveny
26 Cahill
27 Morgan Lewis
28 Cooley
29 Bracewell & Guiliani
30


Did they tell you to move Simpson and DPW down at all based on their data?


Any insight on positioning for Cleary or S&C from their information? My only data points are that someone missed Cleary at 16 and someone missed S&C at 15 last year. Would love to hear any additional info.

- Roger Sterling

I know you said you weren't really focusing on grades for this list, but could someone clarify for roughly what GPA range this list would be appropriate?


Well since this is anonymous ... GPA in the Kent range. But even so, Career Services suggested that I put some higher interview to offer rate firms in my list. If you haven't gone in to see them yet, I actually would recommend it just to get a look at their information, I'm emailing my final list in again for one last check. I'm also considering swapping Sydley with DLA Piper or Kirkland Ellis, anyone with comments on either of those firms, I'd love to hear anyone's experiences.

Ace

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:54 am

aceofspades8412 wrote:
Well since this is anonymous ... GPA in the Kent range. But even so, Career Services suggested that I put some higher interview to offer rate firms in my list. If you haven't gone in to see them yet, I actually would recommend it just to get a look at their information, I'm emailing my final list in again for one last check. I'm also considering swapping Sydley with DLA Piper or Kirkland Ellis, anyone with comments on either of those firms, I'd love to hear anyone's experiences.

Ace


Ace -- for what it's worth, I really think OCS is just covering their ass. Are you k-jd? Even if so (and even if you aren't on CLR, which you almost certainly are if you wanted it), you should not be considering DLA Piper. Kirkland and Sidley are pretty interchangeable if you want to tinker, but DLA Piper shouldn't be on your radar. They have 4k+ attorneys in like 80 offices. It's a factory and there's a always a risk of a contraction in business leading to downsizing. Even ITE, you have nothing to worry about.

Obviously WLRK is always a crapshoot, but if you don't get multiple offers out of Skadden, S&C, STB, and Cravath then it would likely reflect something about your interviewing or personality, and bidding on less selective firms won't fix that. (some like DPW are more fit/culture conscious).

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:18 pm

Back again, 3.7, secondary journal, meh WE. Hopefully this is close to final, although I could use some recommendations for 25-30 (don't really want to, but could bid a secondary market if I'm just wasting those bids otherwise).
- Rufus

1. Kirkland
2. Sidley
3. Shearman
4. Skadden
5. Jones Day
6. Gibson
7. Debevoise
8. Sullivan Crom
9. Cleary

10. Latham
11. Milbank
12. Wilkie

13. Cahill
14. Schulte
15. Fried Frank
16. Davis Polk
17. Covington
18. Paul Weiss
19. Simpson TB

20. Freshfields
21. Cadwalader
22. Chadbourne
23. Cravath
24. Goodwin Proctor
25. O'Melveny
26. Dechert
27. Boeis Corp
28. Hughes Hubbard
29. Baker Botts
30.

edit: bolded firms I really want to get an interview with.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:37 pm

Bump, since errbody got carried away with journals.

Anonymous User wrote:Would love some advice on my bidlist. 3.68, not a lot of WE, probably a weak interviewer. Looking at New York offices only, but with a longer-term goal of moving internationally, so probably looking at transactional work and cross-border practices.

1. Sidley Austin LLP
2. Shearman & Sterling LLP
3. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom
4. Mayer Brown LLP
5. Allen & Overy
6. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
7. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
8. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
9. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
10. Clifford Chance
11. Latham & Watkins LLP
12. Covington
13. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
14. WilmerHale LLP
15. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
16. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
17. Paul Weiss
18. Cahill
19. Davis Polk
20. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
21. Simpson Thatcher
22. Milbank
23. Cadwalader
24. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
25. Stroock
26. Dechert
27. Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP (Corp)
28. Hughes Hubbard
29. GoodwinProcter
30. Roberts & Holland LLP

Keep in mind I have no idea what I'm doing. Does anything stand out as a glaring error/omission? Is it safe enough for a poor interviewer?
I'm also looking at Jones Day, Linklaters and Freshfields, but I don't know where to put them and I'm wary of omitting firms with larger class sizes. Any advice is appreciated.


~ Bertie Botts

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:26 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Bump, since errbody got carried away with journals.

Anonymous User wrote:Would love some advice on my bidlist. 3.68, not a lot of WE, probably a weak interviewer. Looking at New York offices only, but with a longer-term goal of moving internationally, so probably looking at transactional work and cross-border practices.

1. Sidley Austin LLP
2. Shearman & Sterling LLP
3. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom
4. Mayer Brown LLP
5. Allen & Overy
6. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
7. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
8. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
9. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
10. Clifford Chance
11. Latham & Watkins LLP
12. Covington
13. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
14. WilmerHale LLP
15. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
16. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
17. Paul Weiss
18. Cahill
19. Davis Polk
20. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
21. Simpson Thatcher
22. Milbank
23. Cadwalader
24. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
25. Stroock
26. Dechert
27. Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP (Corp)
28. Hughes Hubbard
29. GoodwinProcter
30. Roberts & Holland LLP

Keep in mind I have no idea what I'm doing. Does anything stand out as a glaring error/omission? Is it safe enough for a poor interviewer?
I'm also looking at Jones Day, Linklaters and Freshfields, but I don't know where to put them and I'm wary of omitting firms with larger class sizes. Any advice is appreciated.


~ Bertie Botts


Seems pretty good overall. Milbank might be a bit too low if it's a firm you really want. I would consider finding space for FF on your list, maybe in the low 20s.
Edit: I'd also move Wachtell down a bit, assuming you didn't get LR, (you didn't mention it).

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:56 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Seems pretty good overall. Milbank might be a bit too low if it's a firm you really want. I would consider finding space for FF on your list, maybe in the low 20s.
Edit: I'd also move Wachtell down a bit, assuming you didn't get LR, (you didn't mention it).


Thanks. No LR, but have a board position on a secondary journal. Will probably still move it down.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:01 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Seems pretty good overall. Milbank might be a bit too low if it's a firm you really want. I would consider finding space for FF on your list, maybe in the low 20s.
Edit: I'd also move Wachtell down a bit, assuming you didn't get LR, (you didn't mention it).


Thanks. No LR, but have a board position on a secondary journal. Will probably still move it down.


Yeah, I don't mean to be discouraging, but w/o Kent, LR, strong WE, or killer interviewing ability Wachtell is a bit of a stretch (not saying you need all of those, but probably 2 or 3). Nothing wrong with taking a shot with a bid at 29 or 30 though.

- Rufus

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:13 pm

~3.6, interested in lit, any advice on bid order is appreciated
1. Boies Schiller (NY)
2. Shearman & Sterling (NY)
3. Kirkland Ellis (NY)
4. Mayer Brown (NY)
5. Sidley Austin (NY)
6. Gibson Dunn (NY)
7. Skadden Arps (NY)
8. WilmerHale (NY)
9. White & Case (NY)
10. Ropes & Gray (NY)
11. Cleary (NY)
12. Debevoise (NY)
13. Paul Weiss (NY)
14. Cravath (NY)
15. Sullivan Cromwell (NY)
16. Sidley Austin (DC)
17. Morrison Foerster (NY)
18. Davis Polk (NY)
19. Milbank Tweed (NY)
20. Freshfields (NY)
21. Covington and Burling (NY)
22. Simpson Thatcher (NY)
23. King & Spalding (NY)
24. WilmerHale (DC)
25. O'Melveny & [deleted] (DC)
26. Covington and Burling (DC)
27. Cleary (DC)
28. Arnold & Porter (DC)
29. Skadden Arps (DC)
30. Paul Weiss (DC)

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:36 pm

Anonymous User wrote:~3.6, interested in lit, any advice on bid order is appreciated
1. Boies Schiller (NY)
2. Shearman & Sterling (NY)
3. Kirkland Ellis (NY)
4. Mayer Brown (NY)
5. Sidley Austin (NY)
6. Gibson Dunn (NY)
7. Skadden Arps (NY)
8. WilmerHale (NY)
9. White & Case (NY)
10. Ropes & Gray (NY)
11. Cleary (NY)
12. Debevoise (NY)
13. Paul Weiss (NY)
14. Cravath (NY)
15. Sullivan Cromwell (NY)
16. Sidley Austin (DC)
17. Morrison Foerster (NY)
18. Davis Polk (NY)
19. Milbank Tweed (NY)
20. Freshfields (NY)
21. Covington and Burling (NY)
22. Simpson Thatcher (NY)
23. King & Spalding (NY)
24. WilmerHale (DC)
25. O'Melveny & [deleted] (DC)
26. Covington and Burling (DC)
27. Cleary (DC)
28. Arnold & Porter (DC)
29. Skadden Arps (DC)
30. Paul Weiss (DC)


I think your bid order/strategy might need some work. I highlighted firms that I think are too low in red, and the one I think is too high in blue. I don't know enough about the DC offices to comment on their placement.

I'm not sure if Covington and Burling DC is in reach with a ~3.6, same with Boies for lit. As it stands I think your bid list is dangerous because you're probably going to miss out on a number of the desirable NY firms and will be left with firms that (I'd guess) are not your real targets in NYC and firms that might be a bit of a reach in DC. It might be a good idea to reconsider which firms/offices you're bidding on as well as the bid order.

-Ted "Theodore" Logan

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:00 pm

~3.55, K-JD, leaning towards lit, but interested in corp as well. All offices are NY

1. Shearman & Sterling LLP
2. Kirkland & Ellis LLP
3. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
4. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, & Flom
5. Jones Day
6. Clifford Chance US LLP
7. Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
8. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
9. Latham & Watkins LLP
10. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
11. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
12. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
13. Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP
14. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
15. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
16. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
17. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
18. Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
19. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
20. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
21. Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
22. Chadbourne & Parke LLP
23. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
24. Covington & Burling
25. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
26. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
27. Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
28. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
29. Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler LLP

Torg20
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:50 pm

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Torg20 » Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:57 am

Hey Ace, which career advisor told you about the records of highest successful bids from years past? Mine hasn't heard anything about it.

lspa2015
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 2:28 pm

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby lspa2015 » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:33 am

nm

Anonymous User
Posts: 273135
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Columbia Law School EIP 2013

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:46 am

lspa2015 wrote: FYI you have Cleary twice - 11 and 27


Not OP, but its Cleary NY and Cleary DC. And you figured it out obviously haha.

I have a question on a somewhat related topic -- I'm 95% sure I want to do corporate in NY. But I have good grades and now found out I made LR. Is it worth putting some DC firms in the 20s in my bidlist? Thinking specifically about Covington DC and and WilmerHale DC. Might it make sense even just to get more screeners?




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.