. Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Lagunitan

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:12 pm

.

Post by Lagunitan » Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:16 pm

.
Last edited by Lagunitan on Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BruceWayne

Gold
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by BruceWayne » Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:19 pm

Teaching is professional work experience. No one is going to look down on that. What I did before law school on the other hand... :(

User avatar
JoeFish

Bronze
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:43 am

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by JoeFish » Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:30 pm

[b]BruceWayne[/b] wrote:Teaching is professional work experience. No one is going to look down on that. What I did before law school on the other hand... :(
What, moonlighting as a hard core vigilante in Gotham?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:14 pm

I know someone with several years teaching English abroad with an offer at Ropes and Gray. I also know plenty of people with TFA with offers. I wouldn't worry. As long as you can articulate a thoughtful reason why you want to go to law school and why you made the transition, it's fine.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:42 pm

I had very non-traditional W/E before law school, and it wasn't anywhere near as impressive as that which you listed. I had tons of interviewers ask me about my experience and react as if it was great that I did something different. But, important caveat: I had strong grades.

So, as with anything else, the answer to how this resume item will be regarded likely turns on your grades: if your grades are above what the firm is looking for, you'll find that "unique" experiences tend to be seen as a boost. If not, you may have to do more work to explain it away and convince the interviewer you're dedicated to a career in law.

Everything in interviews gets easier if you're seen as a sought-after candidate.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:22 pm

You should absolutely take this job, with no second thoughts.

Be ready to talk about the job in terms of a) why you took it, b) what you accomplished and how you grew professionally, c) how it has helped you in law school and how you to expect it to help you in your career. This is something that should come into play in how you present it on your resume as well. Also, some firms I've come across (think Magic Circle) will really like to see evidence of an international outlook, especially if you are interested in working internationally in law.

My advice is based on going through OCI with an interesting work experience on my resume, and finding that at least half of all interviewers were really intrigued, and were very keen to hear about exactly what my experience was like. A side bonus is that since you know everyone will ask about these cool aspects of your resume, you become very polished at using your responses there to deliver the message you want them to hear.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:24 pm

But I would ditto the prior poster who notes that everything is likely to be looked at in a different light when you have strong grades. That's the thing that can help or hurt anyone the most, obviously. Another thing is that this interesting work experience is in an area where you've already shown interest, namely teaching. It'd play a little differently if you're jumping around from cool experience to cool experience with no common thread.

Lagunitan

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:12 pm

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by Lagunitan » Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:29 pm

.
Last edited by Lagunitan on Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Is non-professional pre-law W/E detrimental?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:21 pm

I'm on the recruiting committee at my firm and I can tell you that we look at any full-time after-undergrad work experience favorably.

In your specific case, I think it would be a tremendous conversation-starter in interviews.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”