Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
So im going to one of those midwestern T25s and its come down to 2 offers for me.
1, a fairly well known Chicago firm that pays market (160k) and would have very good exit options but I wasn't really in love with and 2, a firm that is top/near the top of their secondary market (think KC, Indy) that I LOVED but would have worse exit options and would pay much, much less.
I will be coming out of law school with no, or negligible debt and a SO with minimal debt as well who is happy and able to settle down in either city.
Goals: not entirely sold on going hard core partner track and would probably be much happier lateraling after 5-8 yrs and taking a reduction in hrs for a non-equity partnership offer.
So, ......what are peoples opinions?
1, a fairly well known Chicago firm that pays market (160k) and would have very good exit options but I wasn't really in love with and 2, a firm that is top/near the top of their secondary market (think KC, Indy) that I LOVED but would have worse exit options and would pay much, much less.
I will be coming out of law school with no, or negligible debt and a SO with minimal debt as well who is happy and able to settle down in either city.
Goals: not entirely sold on going hard core partner track and would probably be much happier lateraling after 5-8 yrs and taking a reduction in hrs for a non-equity partnership offer.
So, ......what are peoples opinions?
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
Sort of depends on practice area, but I think Chicago market paying firm is going to best the secondary market firm in almost all categories.Anonymous User wrote:So im going to one of those midwestern T25s and its come down to 2 offers for me.
1, a fairly well known Chicago firm that pays market (160k) and would have very good exit options but I wasn't really in love with and 2, a firm that is top/near the top of their secondary market (think KC, Indy) that I LOVED but would have worse exit options and would pay much, much less.
I will be coming out of law school with no, or negligible debt and a SO with minimal debt as well who is happy and able to settle down in either city.
Goals: not entirely sold on gonna hard core partner track and would probably be much happier lateraling after 5-8 yrs and taking a reduction in hrs for a non-equity partnership offer.
So, ......what are peoples opinions?
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
If you're correctly predicting what you will want down the road right here, I think the Chicago firm is the right call.Anonymous User wrote: Goals: not entirely sold on gonna hard core partner track and would probably be much happier lateraling after 5-8 yrs and taking a reduction in hrs for a non-equity partnership offer.
What about the Chicago firm makes you hesitate?
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
What's the practice area? What's the Chicago firm? I'm going to a Chicago firm and interviewed at and researched several of them. They're pretty different.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
[/quote] Sort of depends on practice area, but I think Chicago market paying firm is going to best the secondary market firm in almost all categories.[/quote]
Practice area would be very broadly Corporate or finance.
As for which firm specifically, Im not entirely sure I wanna out the specific firms as of yet (sorry). But Chicago is one of the firms in the class below K&E, Baker and Sidley Austin.
Practice area would be very broadly Corporate or finance.
I was just "ehhh" about everyone I met at the Chicago firm plus the hours, stress and the fact that the secondary firm is SOOO much more laid back and friendly.IAFG wrote:If you're correctly predicting what you will want down the road right here, I think the Chicago firm is the right call.Anonymous User wrote: Goals: not entirely sold on gonna hard core partner track and would probably be much happier lateraling after 5-8 yrs and taking a reduction in hrs for a non-equity partnership offer.
What about the Chicago firm makes you hesitate?
As for which firm specifically, Im not entirely sure I wanna out the specific firms as of yet (sorry). But Chicago is one of the firms in the class below K&E, Baker and Sidley Austin.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
Corporate and finance work will be vastly superior in Chicago. The secondary market firms and clients will probably eat up that experience in 4-5 years when it's time to lateral.Anonymous User wrote:Practice area would be very broadly Corporate or finance.Anonymous User wrote: Sort of depends on practice area, but I think Chicago market paying firm is going to best the secondary market firm in almost all categories.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago Vault Firm vs. Good Fit Secondary Firm
Agreed, the firm OP currently has an offer at will probably available again later, along with other similar options.Anonymous User wrote:Corporate and finance work will be vastly superior in Chicago. The secondary market firms and clients will probably eat up that experience in 4-5 years when it's time to lateral.Anonymous User wrote:Practice area would be very broadly Corporate or finance.Anonymous User wrote: Sort of depends on practice area, but I think Chicago market paying firm is going to best the secondary market firm in almost all categories.