Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Boies vs. Quinn

Boies
25
74%
Quinn
9
26%
 
Total votes: 34

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:26 am

This is just excruciating.

Factors that are important to me: culture (both seem very distinct but I identified with each during interviews), job security, compensation and business model, training/mentorship, ability to have input on assignments and eventual specialization, and flexibility of schedule/facetime requirements (I want and expect to work long hours but also some freedom to structure my time when possible).

It seems like Boies might be a better place to be an associate and Quinn to be a partner. I'm thinking long-term but don't know what to make of that difference. Other obvious concerns: the burnout factor at Quinn (everyone seemed way more energetic than associates at V5 firms); the whole "what if David Boies dies" thing (right now actually seems like a good time to join to be a mid-level or senior associate if/when the firm makes that transition). These both seem like rumors to a large extent; can anyone provide first-hand insight? Thanks.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:17 am

These firms are very similar. Both are prestigious places known for excellent litigation work, terrible firm cultures, high burnout rates (even for big law), and great exit options. The main difference is compensation because Boies is not quite lockstep beyond the first year. In theory, "merit"-based pay is good, but consider that you don't choose which cases you are staffed on, who you work with, or what the case strategy is. Yet people get fired or docked compensation at Boies because the case they were staffed on was lost. (See this link: http://abovethelaw.com/2010/11/the-boie ... an-update/). So, "merit"-based pay has a real dark side, especially for junior associates who have very little control.

I would say pick Quinn. I have yet to hear of anyone getting fired at Quinn because the partners lost the case, Quinn is lock-step salary-wise but pays good bonuses (consistently better than most big law firms) and Quinn isn't beholden to one partner (Boies Schiller revolves around Boies and the "what is Boies dies?" question is a serious one).

Regardless of where you choose, you will likely not be smiling at work or happy you are there. But that's just big law in general.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:46 pm

Anonymous User wrote: I have yet to hear of anyone getting fired at Quinn because the partners lost the case

What? I like the merit-based thing despite the potential downside, but job security is a much bigger deal. Does Boies have a history of firing junior associates or stealthing people?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:11 pm

At Quinn, I heard that even after you've passed over to make it as a partner, Quinn does not fire you or tel you to leave. Rather, you can stay on as an associate or they even make you counsel. True?

User avatar
fatduck
Posts: 4186
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby fatduck » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:16 pm

Anonymous User wrote:At Quinn, I heard that even after you've passed over to make it as a partner, Quinn does not fire you or tel you to leave. Rather, you can stay on as an associate or they even make you counsel. True?

Image

User avatar
sundance95
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby sundance95 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:35 pm

You'll work just as hard at Boies as at Quinn, and get as good (if not better) substantive experience. However, you'll be paid significantly more at Boies.

W/r/t the Terra litigation and the layoffs that resulted from it, to my knowledge that is the only such story to come out of Boies, so I think its reasonable to presume that that was a unique situation.

User avatar
bk1
Posts: 18418
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby bk1 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:38 pm

Anonymous User wrote:At Quinn, I heard that even after you've passed over to make it as a partner, Quinn does not fire you or tel you to leave. Rather, you can stay on as an associate or they even make you counsel. True?

True or not, it's not important to picking an SA offer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: I have yet to hear of anyone getting fired at Quinn because the partners lost the case

What? I like the merit-based thing despite the potential downside, but job security is a much bigger deal. Does Boies have a history of firing junior associates or stealthing people?

A long, loooong history of it! Job security is hard to come by in big law, but it's an oxymoron at Boies. It's a mercenary place.

Oh and no, Terra was not an isolated incident. It was just the one incident that made the news because one of the associates was pregnant and the firings happened quickly enough for people to tie it to Terra. Boies has since learned to be craftier.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Boies has since learned to be craftier.

For example?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:00 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Boies has since learned to be craftier.

For example?
Do you really expect me to share details that can potentially out me or those I know? Get to know current/former Boies Associates in real life. Your school's alum list is valuable. Boies's rep isn't a secret.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Do you really expect me to share details that can potentially out me or those I know? Get to know current/former Boies Associates in real life. Your school's alum list is valuable. Boies's rep isn't a secret.

Fair enough. Maybe you can answer this: on a scale of Latham to 100% job security, what's your best estimate of the risk level you might feel as an associate there? Source of constant anxiety?

anon168
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:36 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby anon168 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:32 pm

Anonymous User wrote:At Quinn, I heard that even after you've passed over to make it as a partner, Quinn does not fire you or tel you to leave. Rather, you can stay on as an associate or they even make you counsel. True?


No.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:01 pm

anon168 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:At Quinn, I heard that even after you've passed over to make it as a partner, Quinn does not fire you or tel you to leave. Rather, you can stay on as an associate or they even make you counsel. True?


No.

Why do you say "No?" I know that this has happened at least at the SF and NYC offices. Perhaps it's not true of all the offices, but I'm pretty sure none of the offices have an "up and out" policy. As others have suggested, if you're willing to bill a bunch of hours, Quinn is happy to keep you around.

As for the "Boies v. Quinn" question, I think the firms are pretty similar. They're both litigation-heavy sweatshops that pay above market (though you have the potential to make more at Boies). The OP suggested that Boies is a better place to be an associate, but I'm not sure that's true. I know associates at both firms, and the Boies associates seem even more burnt out than the Quinn associates.

anon168
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:36 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby anon168 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:11 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
anon168 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:At Quinn, I heard that even after you've passed over to make it as a partner, Quinn does not fire you or tel you to leave. Rather, you can stay on as an associate or they even make you counsel. True?


No.

Why do you say "No?" I know that this has happened at least at the SF and NYC offices. Perhaps it's not true of all the offices, but I'm pretty sure none of the offices have an "up and out" policy. As others have suggested, if you're willing to bill a bunch of hours, Quinn is happy to keep you around.

As for the "Boies v. Quinn" question, I think the firms are pretty similar. They're both litigation-heavy sweatshops that pay above market (though you have the potential to make more at Boies). The OP suggested that Boies is a better place to be an associate, but I'm not sure that's true. I know associates at both firms, and the Boies associates seem even more burnt out than the Quinn associates.


At some point, they ask you to leave. No one wants a 15th year associate on their firm bio/resume.

You can stay easily beyond 8-10 years if the partner you are working for has the work for you, but at some that pipeline dries up and it is cheaper for the firm to use a midlevel associate or another sr. associate passed up for partnership.

User avatar
sundance95
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby sundance95 » Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:00 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: I have yet to hear of anyone getting fired at Quinn because the partners lost the case

What? I like the merit-based thing despite the potential downside, but job security is a much bigger deal. Does Boies have a history of firing junior associates or stealthing people?

A long, loooong history of it! Job security is hard to come by in big law, but it's an oxymoron at Boies. It's a mercenary place.

Oh and no, Terra was not an isolated incident. It was just the one incident that made the news because one of the associates was pregnant and the firings happened quickly enough for people to tie it to Terra. Boies has since learned to be craftier.

You're accusing Boies of stealthing? I'm surprised to hear it, if only because when firms utilize stealthing practices it seems to make ATL, and quickly.

Anonymous User wrote:Do you really expect me to share details that can potentially out me or those I know? Get to know current/former Boies Associates in real life. Your school's alum list is valuable. Boies's rep isn't a secret.

Also, you feel like a troll.

User avatar
sunynp
Posts: 1899
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby sunynp » Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:08 am

Here is a link to the third and final article ATL did on the stealthing of the three women associates. I think the story broke pretty quickly after they were fired.
http://abovethelaw.com/2010/11/the-boie ... an-update/

User avatar
sundance95
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby sundance95 » Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:10 am

Right, that's the Terra incident referenced above.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:41 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Do you really expect me to share details that can potentially out me or those I know? Get to know current/former Boies Associates in real life. Your school's alum list is valuable. Boies's rep isn't a secret.

Fair enough. Maybe you can answer this: on a scale of Latham to 100% job security, what's your best estimate of the risk level you might feel as an associate there? Source of constant anxiety?
It's not a Latham. Latham imploded. Boies is unlikely to do so. But source of constant anxiety? Yes. It's not just the end of year reviews you have to fear. Fear the impromptu reviews too - you get summoned to a meeting randomly one day and the same people who have spent months/weeks complimenting you are assembled to tell you that you work is so bad that you have to leave within two weeks. Turns out "merit" is very easy to define and redefine according to the firm's economic needs or just a partner's whim. It's about a culture of throwing people away. Not every big law firm has that mentality. Some actually give you a few years to prove yourself. Ask the right questions, reach out to alums, figure out where you're least likely to get taken out with the trash for reasons couched as "merit" but unrelated to merit. Or don't. It's your career.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 08, 2012 12:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:It's not just the end of year reviews you have to fear. Fear the impromptu reviews too - you get summoned to a meeting randomly one day and the same people who have spent months/weeks complimenting you are assembled to tell you that you work is so bad that you have to leave within two weeks. Turns out "merit" is very easy to define and redefine according to the firm's economic needs or just a partner's whim. It's about a culture of throwing people away. Not every big law firm has that mentality. Some actually give you a few years to prove yourself. Ask the right questions, reach out to alums, figure out where you're least likely to get taken out with the trash for reasons couched as "merit" but unrelated to merit. Or don't. It's your career.

But this can happen anywhere, right? And certain firms who have a policy of hiring anyone with the right grades and letting them stay on no matter how useless or awkward they turn out to be might not exactly be preferable work environments. Yes, this is terrifying, but that doesn't really give me a sense of how much more at Boies than anywhere else.

So Quinn will never lay you off no matter how much you suck? Hard to believe given their obsession with being the best.

HeavenWood
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby HeavenWood » Sat Sep 08, 2012 1:36 pm

Boies no-offers people. A lot of people. High-reward, but I still say it's not worth the risk.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:25 am

Bumping this because I want to hear more about Quinn...

Anonymous User
Posts: 273270
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boies vs. Quinn (NYC)

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:52 pm

bump




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.