Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

For litigation...

Kirkland SF
3
17%
Gibson Dunn SF
15
83%
 
Total votes: 18

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:20 am

For litigation... I liked the people at both equally. My concern is that Kirkland is more prominent for litigation nationally, while Gibson Dunn is more prominent for litigation in SF specifically.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:45 pm

Don't know much about GDC SF, but my understanding after meeting with Kirkland SF is that their lit folks a) do mostly IP, and b) are secondary in importance to their PE corporate work, which is blowing up and has made them the most profitable office in the firm. Unless you had a strong culture/compensation preference for Kirkland, I think GDC is the right choice for Bay Area lit.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:07 pm

I have worked at one of these places. GDC in a heartbeat.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:43 pm

I have worked at both of these firms. While both are great, go with GDC.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:45 pm

Do you have offers from both? What's your school range?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:47 pm

For lit GDC no question.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:49 pm

Anonymous User wrote:For lit GDC no question.

Not to hijack the thread, but I am corporate-focused and have offers at GDC (Palo Alto) and Kirkland (SF). Is anyone able to weigh in on this question for someone in my shoes?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273385
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I have worked at both of these firms. While both are great, go with GDC.


I am making a choice between the DC offices of Kirkland and Gibson. Same advice or are the SF / DC offices totally different? I liked the people at both but feel like Kirkland will be better for lit and they pay better bonuses. Not sure how much the hours would differ between the two firms.

CCN-S Transfer
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:15 pm

Re: Kirkland SF v. Gibson Dunn SF

Postby CCN-S Transfer » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:34 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:For lit GDC no question.

Not to hijack the thread, but I am corporate-focused and have offers at GDC (Palo Alto) and Kirkland (SF). Is anyone able to weigh in on this question for someone in my shoes?


PM me.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.