The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
kalvano
Posts: 11725
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby kalvano » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:36 pm

Anonymous User wrote: the LSATs, the LSATs, the LSATs


Godfuckingdammit.

User avatar
Ludo!
Posts: 4764
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby Ludo! » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:42 pm

What does the LSAT have to do with employment?

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:45 pm

Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?

Basically this.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:45 pm

kalvano wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: the LSATs, the LSATs, the LSATs


Godfuckingdammit.

Maybe we all retook

wormhole
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby wormhole » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:52 pm

Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22859
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

You would like to think that.

User avatar
Ludo!
Posts: 4764
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby Ludo! » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.


LOOOOOOL

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:04 am

Ludovico Technique wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.


LOOOOOOL

+1

lawschooltransparency.com

Anonymous User
Posts: 273422
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:05 am

rad lulz wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.


LOOOOOOL

+1

lawschooltransparency.com


LOL. Above median at a T6 and going to be a jobless 3L. At least a quarter of my class is in the same situation.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273422
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:09 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.


172/CCN/honors here to steal yr jerbs

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby soj » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:16 am

god, i hate law students.

wormhole
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby wormhole » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:19 am

wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

User avatar
Ludo!
Posts: 4764
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby Ludo! » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:21 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.


Anon is not for trying to hide your retardation

User avatar
cinephile
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby cinephile » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:22 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.


Why was that sensitive information that had to be kept anonymous?

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby soj » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:22 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

The top of every page on the Employment Forum:
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads.

I don't have time to out all the posts that abuse anon, but I'll make time to out incredibly insensitive or clueless posts like yours.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:22 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

Because you can't use anon to badger people

wormhole
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby wormhole » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:23 am

cinephile wrote:
wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.


Why was that sensitive information that had to be kept anonymous?


Maybe because I want to maintain a low profile while still contributing to a discussion in other ways. It was not a troll move. I was genuinely wondering how people who scored higher on the LSATs and went to better schools were doing. Jesus, this board takes itself way too seriously.

wormhole
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby wormhole » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:25 am

rad lulz wrote:
wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

Because you can't use anon to badger people


How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:26 am

,
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
cinephile
Posts: 3469
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby cinephile » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:26 am

A person should be willing to accept responsibility for what they say. Anything else is pretty sad, actually.

Geist13
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby Geist13 » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:26 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.


1. yes, the rule about anonymous posting.

2. maybe it was just me, but your second post was DRIPPING with sarcasm, which is a particularly unwelcome tone given the nature of this thread.

wormhole
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby wormhole » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:28 am

Geist13 wrote:
wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?


A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.


WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.


1. yes, the rule about anonymous posting.

2. maybe it was just me, but your second post was DRIPPING with sarcasm, which is a particularly unwelcome tone given the nature of this thread.


LOL. Dripping with sarcasm???

OK, forget it. Good luck to you all.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:28 am

wormhole wrote:How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=146657

Enjoy

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22859
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:31 am

wormhole wrote:How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

The problem with the post is that it implied that the people who ended up in this thread must be here because they didn't really have very good stats to begin with and/or didn't go to very good schools, as opposed to recognizing that the crappiness of the economy means that people wind up in the Vale through no fault of their own.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Postby rad lulz » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:36 am

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
wormhole wrote:How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

The problem with the post is that it implied that the people who ended up in this thread must be here because they didn't really have very good stats to begin with and/or didn't go to very good schools, as opposed to recognizing that the crappiness of the economy means that people wind up in the Vale through no fault of their own.

+1

"Y u no retake for T14 back in 2009" is not helpful to anyone




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.