The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls) Forum

kalvano · Post by **kalvano** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:36 pm

Anonymous User wrote: the LSATs, the LSATs, the LSATs

Godfuckingdammit.

Ludo! · Post by **Ludo!** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:42 pm

What does the LSAT have to do with employment?

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:45 pm

Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?

Basically this.

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:45 pm

kalvano wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: the LSATs, the LSATs, the LSATs
Godfuckingdammit.

Maybe we all retook

wormhole · Post by **wormhole** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:52 pm

Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?

A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

You would like to think that.

Ludo! · Post by **Ludo!** » Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:58 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

LOOOOOOL

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:04 am

Ludovico Technique wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.
LOOOOOOL

+1

lawschooltransparency.com

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:05 am

rad lulz wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.
LOOOOOOL
+1

lawschooltransparency.com

LOL. Above median at a T6 and going to be a jobless 3L. At least a quarter of my class is in the same situation.

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:09 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

172/CCN/honors here to steal yr jerbs

soj · Post by **soj** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:16 am

god, i hate law students.

wormhole · Post by **wormhole** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:19 am

wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.

WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

Ludo! · Post by **Ludo!** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:21 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

Anon is not for trying to hide your retardation

cinephile · Post by **cinephile** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:22 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

Why was that sensitive information that had to be kept anonymous?

soj · Post by **soj** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:22 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

The top of every page on the Employment Forum:

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads.

I don't have time to out all the posts that abuse anon, but I'll make time to out incredibly insensitive or clueless posts like yours.

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:22 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

Because you can't use anon to badger people

wormhole · Post by **wormhole** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:23 am

cinephile wrote:
wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.
Why was that sensitive information that had to be kept anonymous?

Maybe because I want to maintain a low profile while still contributing to a discussion in other ways. It was not a troll move. I was genuinely wondering how people who scored higher on the LSATs and went to better schools were doing. Jesus, this board takes itself way too seriously.

wormhole · Post by **wormhole** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:25 am

rad lulz wrote:
wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.
Because you can't use anon to badger people

How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:26 am

cinephile · Post by **cinephile** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:26 am

A person should be willing to accept responsibility for what they say. Anything else is pretty sad, actually.

Geist13 · Post by **Geist13** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:26 am

wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.

1. yes, the rule about anonymous posting.

2. maybe it was just me, but your second post was DRIPPING with sarcasm, which is a particularly unwelcome tone given the nature of this thread.

wormhole · Post by **wormhole** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:28 am

Geist13 wrote:
wormhole wrote:
wormhole wrote:
Ludovico Technique wrote:What does the LSAT have to do with employment?
A lot. Someone who got 170+ and chose a T-14 is probably not in this thread.

User was outed.
WTF? What's with the outing?? Did I violate some rule??? It was an innocent question.
1. yes, the rule about anonymous posting.

2. maybe it was just me, but your second post was DRIPPING with sarcasm, which is a particularly unwelcome tone given the nature of this thread.

LOL. Dripping with sarcasm???

OK, forget it. Good luck to you all.

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:28 am

wormhole wrote: How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=146657

Enjoy

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:31 am

wormhole wrote:How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.

The problem with the post is that it implied that the people who ended up in this thread must be here because they didn't really have very good stats to begin with and/or didn't go to very good schools, as opposed to recognizing that the crappiness of the economy means that people wind up in the Vale through no fault of their own.

rad lulz · Post by **rad lulz** » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:36 am

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
wormhole wrote:How was that badgering people? I wasn't asking people to explain themselves. I was genuinely interested in knowing if they had done well on the LSATs, but decided to go to a lower ranked school, but found themselves in a difficult position. It's not a crime to gauge the situation with the economy and try to find out all possible explanations.
The problem with the post is that it implied that the people who ended up in this thread must be here because they didn't really have very good stats to begin with and/or didn't go to very good schools, as opposed to recognizing that the crappiness of the economy means that people wind up in the Vale through no fault of their own.

+1

"Y u no retake for T14 back in 2009" is not helpful to anyone

The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls) Forum

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Register for access!

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Register now!

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Re: The Vale of Tears (3L Job Hunting) (No advice for 0/1/2Ls)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?