Gibson Dunn vs. Paul Weiss vs. Cleary Gottlieb (DC) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Gibson Dunn vs. Paul Weiss vs. Cleary Gottlieb (DC)
For someone who wants to do litigation (not necessarily appellate, and not limited only to antitrust/securities/financial stuff) which is the place to go? Taking into account things like how much stand-up experience juniors get, how much substantive writing responsibility, etc.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Gibson Dunn vs. Paul Weiss vs. Cleary Gottlieb (DC)
Gibson has the widest ranging practice and largest office. You're probably best off there.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Gibson Dunn vs. Paul Weiss vs. Cleary Gottlieb (DC)
PW DC is best if you want to work on a lot of trials, although you will not get much stand-up experience as a junior associate unless you work on pro bono matters. Not sure how Gibson and Cleary compare re: stand-up experience, though.
