Strategy behind choosing lit/transactional

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 273147
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Strategy behind choosing lit/transactional

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:16 pm

for firms that are known for hedge fund work and corporate work, would it be to your advantage to actually say you are interested in litigation? (they may need more ppl interested in lit). for ex: schulte and seward. or does it just come off like you haven't done your homework and have no business wanting to be at that firm. thanks

User avatar
thesealocust
Posts: 8442
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm

Re: Strategy behind choosing lit/transactional

Postby thesealocust » Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:32 pm

Step 1: Determine which you think you would prefer

Step 2: Say that when asked

The most corporate dominated firms are still generally something like ~30% litigators. If anything ,there might be a slight edge overall to people who express an interest in corporate because many people go to law school without knowing what transactional work or every bothering to research it.

Seriously though, it's on the margins ESPECIALLY compared to your own personal preferences. Follow your hearts, young ones.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.