Boalt EIW 2012 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Boalt EIW 2012
I don't know how many Boalties we have lurking here, but why not start a thread to discuss EIW when our results come out today?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Seems like my list is solid. I got everyone in my 1-25 it seems. I haven't verified substantially, but it doesn't seem like I missed out on any of my big picks.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Same here. Is getting as many other interviews to fill the gaps the way to go now?Anonymous User wrote:Seems like my list is solid. I got everyone in my 1-25 it seems. I haven't verified substantially, but it doesn't seem like I missed out on any of my big picks.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
I mean, your call. If it's a firm you have interest in, why not? But, I wouldn't sacrifice your sanity to have 30+ interviews just for the hell of it.Anonymous User wrote:Same here. Is getting as many other interviews to fill the gaps the way to go now?Anonymous User wrote:Seems like my list is solid. I got everyone in my 1-25 it seems. I haven't verified substantially, but it doesn't seem like I missed out on any of my big picks.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
My interest is in employment. Any good rule of thumb yields? Generally, how many interviews yield how many callbacks?Anonymous User wrote:I mean, your call. If it's a firm you have interest in, why not? But, I wouldn't sacrifice your sanity to have 30+ interviews just for the hell of it.Anonymous User wrote:Same here. Is getting as many other interviews to fill the gaps the way to go now?Anonymous User wrote:Seems like my list is solid. I got everyone in my 1-25 it seems. I haven't verified substantially, but it doesn't seem like I missed out on any of my big picks.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Just canceled a WilmerHale Palo Alto interview, so at least one spot is up for grabs tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
I'd be a little cautious about overbooking and fatiguing yourself. You can probably pull off a marathon day of 8 interviews, but your late ones that day will suffer (and it's likely te ones the next day will as well). Similarly, 6-7 interviews a day will probably leave you on fumes by day 4-5.Anonymous User wrote:Same here. Is getting as many other interviews to fill the gaps the way to go now?Anonymous User wrote:Seems like my list is solid. I got everyone in my 1-25 it seems. I haven't verified substantially, but it doesn't seem like I missed out on any of my big picks.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Wow, congrats. I missed a few in my top 25, but I'm happy with it for the most part. Hopefully I can pick those up at the hospitality suites, since I don't expect any of them to have open slots.Anonymous User wrote:Seems like my list is solid. I got everyone in my 1-25 it seems. I haven't verified substantially, but it doesn't seem like I missed out on any of my big picks.
Re another poster, I don't have any desire to do more than maybe 25 interviews. 20 already sounds like hell.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Missed a bunch of DC, which I doubt will be opening up. Guess it's hospitality suites for me.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
In the hopes that future Boalites use the search function, and because I couldn't find this information and consequently missed on a couple firms I really wanted:
-Orrick (SF) was gone by #8
-Lieff Cabraser gone by #16
-Paul Hastings (LA) gone by #17
-Altshuler Berzon gone by # 19
-Bingham (LA and SF) gone by # 20-21, respectively
-Sullivan Cromwell gone by #25
-Ropes & Gray gone by #27
Also, Irell (LA), Sidley (Chi), Latham (foreign offices), Jenner Block (Chi) somewhat surprisingly had open slots.
Feel free to add....
-Orrick (SF) was gone by #8
-Lieff Cabraser gone by #16
-Paul Hastings (LA) gone by #17
-Altshuler Berzon gone by # 19
-Bingham (LA and SF) gone by # 20-21, respectively
-Sullivan Cromwell gone by #25
-Ropes & Gray gone by #27
Also, Irell (LA), Sidley (Chi), Latham (foreign offices), Jenner Block (Chi) somewhat surprisingly had open slots.
Feel free to add....
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
It might help to add what Orrick office. I got Orrick LA at a pretty low bid. The CDO only offers the previous year's data; so if you were early enough to visit the CDO website to get the 2010 data before they updated with 2011's, you could have looked at two data points instead of just one. Still two data points isn't ultimately that helpful.Anonymous User wrote:In the hopes that future Boalites use the search function, and because I couldn't find this information and consequently missed on a couple firms I really wanted:
-Orrick was gone by #8
-Lieff Cabraser gone by #16
-Paul Hastings (LA) gone by #17
-Altshuler Berzon gone by # 19
-Bingham (LA and SF) gone by # 20-21, respectively
-Sullivan Cromwell gone by #25
-Ropes & Gray gone by #27
Also, Irell (LA), Sidley (Chi), Latham (foreign offices), Jenner Block (Chi) somewhat surprisingly had open slots.
Feel free to add....
My advice for future Boalties is this: assume a little over half your class is gunning for SF; about a quarter shoot shoot for LA. The rest aim for NY or DC. That's not groundbreaking information, but it helps ground your bidding. For example, you better put MoFo SF pretty high up if you want it, but you can afford to gamble a little with NY or DC firms.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
I also got Orrick LA fairly low (22).
Bingham LA was gone by 18.
I was also surprised that slots were open for some of the bigger firms.
Bingham LA was gone by 18.
I was also surprised that slots were open for some of the bigger firms.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Might be because people canceled their interviews. How about Wachtell being full.Anonymous User wrote:I also got Orrick LA fairly low (22).
Bingham LA was gone by 18.
I was also surprised that slots were open for some of the bigger firms.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
(1) Is it just me or is b-line down? and (2) Does anyone else find it a bit odd that we can see who else is interviewing with a particular firm? I don't really see the merit in that.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
It's definitely true that the SF firms are the most overbid, but I missed out on DC firms I bid in the low to mid teens.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
To add to the information pot, word on the street last year was that you had to bid Altshuler and Lieff in the top three to get an interview.Anonymous User wrote: -Lieff Cabraser gone by #16
-Altshuler Berzon gone by # 19
Good luck, everyone!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Damn, that's crazy. Though Altshuler did send out an email to collect transcripts for extra interviews, at least.Tangerine Gleam wrote:To add to the information pot, word on the street last year was that you had to bid Altshuler and Lieff in the top three to get an interview.Anonymous User wrote: -Lieff Cabraser gone by #16
-Altshuler Berzon gone by # 19
Good luck, everyone!
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
I don't know much about Irell, but it looks like they didn't get a whole lot of bids, why is that? I expected them to fill up pretty quick.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
This surprised me last year, too. For what it's worth, I don't think it's because people hate Irell or anything (although I know that some people have gone there and then lateraled elsewhere). My guess is that IP-minded folks might be generally more likely to want to practice in the Bay Area.Anonymous User wrote:I don't know much about Irell, but it looks like they didn't get a whole lot of bids, why is that? I expected them to fill up pretty quick.
Also, I remember that the year before my class had EIW, the Irell interviewer was rude to a lot of interviewees, so maybe there is still some residual disinterest after everyone told stories about him/her being a jerk. Perhaps not the most fair way for applicants to evaluate a firm, but this person left an impression nonetheless.
All this aside, if you are interested in litigation in LA, I think Irell is worth interviewing with.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:24 pm
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
Irell is an IP focused firm that is also extremely grade conscious. People who fit that demographic typically want to stay in the Bay Area. People who don't typically don't waste their bids on Irell.Anonymous User wrote:I don't know much about Irell, but it looks like they didn't get a whole lot of bids, why is that? I expected them to fill up pretty quick.
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:03 pm
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
But doesn't Irell do more than IP? The other grade-oriented places (altshuler and wachtell for two) filled up, whereas irell still has half of its schedule open.Staberinde wrote:Irell is an IP focused firm that is also extremely grade conscious. People who fit that demographic typically want to stay in the Bay Area. People who don't typically don't waste their bids on Irell.Anonymous User wrote:I don't know much about Irell, but it looks like they didn't get a whole lot of bids, why is that? I expected them to fill up pretty quick.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
irell definitely does more than IP, they have a really strong white collar practice and there's a lot of securities lit. i think more likely than not the open spots are due to the fact that they are well known for being extremely grade selective, and as stated, the number of people who can meet that cut off and want to be in la from boalt is pretty low.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Boalt EIW 2012
I thought that was awkward last year, too, but it comes in handy if you need to swap times (names are clickable, sends an email).Anonymous User wrote:(2) Does anyone else find it a bit odd that we can see who else is interviewing with a particular firm? I don't really see the merit in that.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login