Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
On Shartsis:
I did a CB with them previously and absolutely would have accepted an offer there (did not get one). I am currently in biglaw in a different market. If you make it to the CB stage w/ Shartsis you'll be alright, b/c you have the grades & the interview was all about personality. Other firms will bite on you even if they do not.
I did a CB with them previously and absolutely would have accepted an offer there (did not get one). I am currently in biglaw in a different market. If you make it to the CB stage w/ Shartsis you'll be alright, b/c you have the grades & the interview was all about personality. Other firms will bite on you even if they do not.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Callback!Anonymous User wrote:Phone screener with the hiring partner of Shartsis next week from mass mail. I like what I hear about them.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Any thoughts on K&E v. Latham (both in the City) for lit? I'll bid them both but the way my list is structured I only have a realistic shot at getting a screener with one of them. I'm having trouble distinguishing them from the outside...
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Awesome, congrats.Anonymous User wrote:Callback!Anonymous User wrote:Phone screener with the hiring partner of Shartsis next week from mass mail. I like what I hear about them.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Have heard bad things about k&e lit...specifically regarding one partner. But this was from a lateral, fwiwAnonymous User wrote:Any thoughts on K&E v. Latham (both in the City) for lit? I'll bid them both but the way my list is structured I only have a realistic shot at getting a screener with one of them. I'm having trouble distinguishing them from the outside...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
West Coast firms have a reputation for lighter hours. Can anyone speak to hours requirements for the major SF/SV lit players (besides Quinn), like MoFo, Cooley, Orrick, GDC, Latham?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Generally Gibson, MoFo, Latham, etc. are on the higher side, i.e. > 2250 hours (and up to 2400+ for K&E and Quinn). Orrick and Bay Area firms (Fenwick, Cooley, etc.) that pay market are around 1950/2000-2200 or so. Of course you can be busy or slow, so that's just a rough guide.Anonymous User wrote:West Coast firms have a reputation for lighter hours. Can anyone speak to hours requirements for the major SF/SV lit players (besides Quinn), like MoFo, Cooley, Orrick, GDC, Latham?
What is the pay scale (say 1-3 year associates) at Coblentz and Lieff?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Thanks for this. Even 2250 doesn't seem that bad compared to NYC, but that's easy to say as a rising 2L.Anonymous User wrote:Generally Gibson, MoFo, Latham, etc. are on the higher side, i.e. > 2250 hours (and up to 2400+ for K&E and Quinn). Orrick and Bay Area firms (Fenwick, Cooley, etc.) that pay market are around 1950/2000-2200 or so. Of course you can be busy or slow, so that's just a rough guide.Anonymous User wrote:West Coast firms have a reputation for lighter hours. Can anyone speak to hours requirements for the major SF/SV lit players (besides Quinn), like MoFo, Cooley, Orrick, GDC, Latham?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
You ever get an offer?Anonymous User wrote:Anyone know anything about Trucker Huss? Have an interview with them and any insight would be appreciated.
- filibuster
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Pretty sure coblentz does not have a summer program
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
I want to do litigation in SF and have an offer at Quinn. What firms is it worth going on other Callbacks for? I know that any firm might be a better "fit" but I specifically mean what firms have better cases, better financial stability/future, better reputation. better lateral options, etc.?
-
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:12 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Get on chambers, it sounds like you definitely need to research this more.
The answer to your question will obviously depend on where you get callbacks, but you should be going on at least a few of them to develop a sense of what you referred to as "fit."
There are several firms that have a strong lit presence in the Bay area, and will give you solid CA exit options. MoFo (SF), Gibson Dunn (SF), Latham (SF), and Boies (Oakland) are a few examples. I've heard uniformly bad things about Quinn in general, so you should see what your other options are.
The answer to your question will obviously depend on where you get callbacks, but you should be going on at least a few of them to develop a sense of what you referred to as "fit."
There are several firms that have a strong lit presence in the Bay area, and will give you solid CA exit options. MoFo (SF), Gibson Dunn (SF), Latham (SF), and Boies (Oakland) are a few examples. I've heard uniformly bad things about Quinn in general, so you should see what your other options are.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Yeah I definitely want to go on at least a few. Many sites are rather opaque and even Chambers is not the best (though helpful). What about OMM, Pillsbury, Jones Day, Cooley, Kirkland?WhiskeynCoke wrote:Get on chambers, it sounds like you definitely need to research this more.
The answer to your question will obviously depend on where you get callbacks, but you should be going on at least a few of them to develop a sense of what you referred to as "fit."
There are several firms that have a strong lit presence in the Bay area, and will give you solid CA exit options. MoFo (SF), Gibson Dunn (SF), Latham (SF), and Boies (Oakland) are a few examples. I've heard uniformly bad things about Quinn in general, so you should see what your other options are.
I've also heard many bad things about Quinn. The people I interviewed with were obviously cool, but that's who they set me up with.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sundance95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
There are rumors regarding Pillsbury's health. Knew a Quinn SF summer who did not like it at all; evidently the junior associate who was in office next to her/his had a habit of weeping in their office with some regularity, which was disconcerting to the summer to say the least.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Jones Day is a great litigation firm, but definitely not boutique. I'm in a different office and on the transactional side so I cannot really speak about exit options, but it was a big-time SF litigator (Bob Pr*fusek) who got me interested in the firm in the first place when I saw him give a presentation about one of his recent cases. Interesting matters for great household name clients.Anonymous User wrote:Yeah I definitely want to go on at least a few. Many sites are rather opaque and even Chambers is not the best (though helpful). What about OMM, Pillsbury, Jones Day, Cooley, Kirkland?WhiskeynCoke wrote:Get on chambers, it sounds like you definitely need to research this more.
The answer to your question will obviously depend on where you get callbacks, but you should be going on at least a few of them to develop a sense of what you referred to as "fit."
There are several firms that have a strong lit presence in the Bay area, and will give you solid CA exit options. MoFo (SF), Gibson Dunn (SF), Latham (SF), and Boies (Oakland) are a few examples. I've heard uniformly bad things about Quinn in general, so you should see what your other options are.
I've also heard many bad things about Quinn. The people I interviewed with were obviously cool, but that's who they set me up with.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
I have a MoFo SF callback coming up, and want corporate work. Is it worth taking them over some of the Silicon Valley big names? What's different about this office versus some of the others in Northern California, and what sort of clients would they be working with on a regular basis?
What advantages would they have over Wilson/Cooley/Fenwick/some of the NY branch offices for someone looking to go in-house at a tech company eventually?
What advantages would they have over Wilson/Cooley/Fenwick/some of the NY branch offices for someone looking to go in-house at a tech company eventually?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Anonymous User wrote:I have a MoFo SF callback coming up, and want corporate work. Is it worth taking them over some of the Silicon Valley big names? What's different about this office versus some of the others in Northern California, and what sort of clients would they be working with on a regular basis?
What advantages would they have over Wilson/Cooley/Fenwick/some of the NY branch offices for someone looking to go in-house at a tech company eventually?
None. MoFo, Wilson, Cooley, Fenwick, Gunderson, Latham are all tops at getting people inhouse.
If your goal is to go inhouse at a big tech company, all of those firms will set you up well (though if your goal is a specific tech company, like Google, you are best served by going to the firm who has them as a client (WSGR) and working in the partner group that regularly has back and forth with Google (Saper)). If your goal is to become GC at a start-up, you are better off at one of Wilson, Cooley, Fenwick and Gunderson. MoFo has a start-up practice, but it isn't even close to these firms.
The SV firms of NY offices are hilarious. They're not nearly as plugged into the ecosystem as the above firms, they work you way harder and they have zero clout around here. You will almost certainly find yourself trying to lateral after one to two years of working at these firms... if you can (we get a ton of resumes from people at these firms).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Thank you, I appreciate that. I'd heard Latham and Davis Polk were two NY branch offices that fared a bit better than the others in SV - is that at all true?Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I have a MoFo SF callback coming up, and want corporate work. Is it worth taking them over some of the Silicon Valley big names? What's different about this office versus some of the others in Northern California, and what sort of clients would they be working with on a regular basis?
What advantages would they have over Wilson/Cooley/Fenwick/some of the NY branch offices for someone looking to go in-house at a tech company eventually?
None. MoFo, Wilson, Cooley, Fenwick, Gunderson, Latham are all tops at getting people inhouse.
If your goal is to go inhouse at a big tech company, all of those firms will set you up well (though if your goal is a specific tech company, like Google, you are best served by going to the firm who has them as a client (WSGR) and working in the partner group that regularly has back and forth with Google (Saper)). If your goal is to become GC at a start-up, you are better off at one of Wilson, Cooley, Fenwick and Gunderson. MoFo has a start-up practice, but it isn't even close to these firms.
The SV firms of NY offices are hilarious. They're not nearly as plugged into the ecosystem as the above firms, they work you way harder and they have zero clout around here. You will almost certainly find yourself trying to lateral after one to two years of working at these firms... if you can (we get a ton of resumes from people at these firms).
And if Silicon Valley firms serve most of the premier public tech companies as well as the start-ups, what does MoFo have left? Would you happen to know which clients they typically work with?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Latham isn't a New York firm. It is an LA firm that relocated its HQ to NY, but it's still very much a national firm and a regional heavyweight. Great brand recognition in Silicon Valley.Thank you, I appreciate that. I'd heard Latham and Davis Polk were two NY branch offices that fared a bit better than the others in SV - is that at all true?
Davis Polk is a whatever in Silicon Valley.
I would lump MoFo in with "Silicon Valley" firms, but caveat that it's more of a law firm that represents blue chip corporations than start-ups. The firms in Silicon Valley rose to fame because the start-ups they represented eventually became blue-chip corporations.And if Silicon Valley firms serve most of the premier public tech companies as well as the start-ups, what does MoFo have left? Would you happen to know which clients they typically work with?
I don't know many of MoFo's clients. I'm pretty sure they do a ton of Intel work, but in general I don't work across from them that much (but I almost exclusively do venture deals, so maybe that's why).
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Thank you!Anonymous User wrote:Latham isn't a New York firm. It is an LA firm that relocated its HQ to NY, but it's still very much a national firm and a regional heavyweight. Great brand recognition in Silicon Valley.Thank you, I appreciate that. I'd heard Latham and Davis Polk were two NY branch offices that fared a bit better than the others in SV - is that at all true?
Davis Polk is a whatever in Silicon Valley.
I would lump MoFo in with "Silicon Valley" firms, but caveat that it's more of a law firm that represents blue chip corporations than start-ups. The firms in Silicon Valley rose to fame because the start-ups they represented eventually became blue-chip corporations.And if Silicon Valley firms serve most of the premier public tech companies as well as the start-ups, what does MoFo have left? Would you happen to know which clients they typically work with?
I don't know many of MoFo's clients. I'm pretty sure they do a ton of Intel work, but in general I don't work across from them that much (but I almost exclusively do venture deals, so maybe that's why).
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Any Kirkland (SF) offers out there? If so, how long was the turnaround from CB to offer?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Yep. 2 days from CB to offer. I think the hiring committee meets on Thursdays.Anonymous User wrote:Any Kirkland (SF) offers out there? If so, how long was the turnaround from CB to offer?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
covington and burling offers??
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Any opinions on Mayer Brown Palo Alto?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk San Francisco - Taking Questions
Bump.Anonymous User wrote:Any opinions on Mayer Brown Palo Alto?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login