3.11 at Penn Bid List Critique

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 273100
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

3.11 at Penn Bid List Critique

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:56 am

.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Wed Jul 04, 2012 8:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273100
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 3.11 at Penn Bid List Critique

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:21 pm

Original anon here; disappointed to see no replies. Is my list just that good or is everyone just too unsure to comment?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273100
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 3.11 at Penn Bid List Critique

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:42 pm

Hey, I'm another Penn student (hovering around median) also with strong Philly ties who is focusing on that market, with NYC being secondary. Overall, your list is solid. However, I would strongly recommend moving Pepper down. They have 80 slots -- for Philly! You could probably bid them 30th and still stand a chance at winning a spot. I'd drop them down and add Saul Ewing somewhere toward the top. With your grades, they should be a firm you make sure you get a screener with.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273100
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: 3.11 at Penn Bid List Critique

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:08 pm

.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.