Are State Clerkships just a lottery? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- BarbellDreams
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
Assuming above median + Journal are state clerkships basically just all about luck? Anything specific to give one an advantage over another?
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
About as much luck as any other job. What school? Also big difference between trial, intermediate, supreme.
Edit: and to your second question, basically anything that would give you an edge for any legal job (knowing someone who is close to the judge, having good writing sample, top grades, etc.)
Edit: and to your second question, basically anything that would give you an edge for any legal job (knowing someone who is close to the judge, having good writing sample, top grades, etc.)
-
- Posts: 428461
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
You looking in PA too, Barbell? edit - accidental anon, this is beach_terror
-
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:26 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
CA ones at Superior Court are actually very competitive because there are so few of them and they only hire at the end of 3L.
Cal. Ct. App. doesn't hire clerks and neither does the Cal. Supreme, although Justice Liu is starting to do so.
Cal. Ct. App. doesn't hire clerks and neither does the Cal. Supreme, although Justice Liu is starting to do so.
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
OP in this thread says he/she got an offer: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 3&t=187869hiima3L wrote:Cal. Ct. App. doesn't hire clerks
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BarbellDreams
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
PA and a few other states I have ties to. I have a close friend who is currently running for state judge so if they actually win it I may just clerk there. *crosses fingers*Anonymous User wrote:You looking in PA too, Barbell? edit - accidental anon, this is beach_terror
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
OP here. Should have clarified...The position is for a staff attorney, but working for a specific judge.ggocat wrote:OP in this thread says he/she got an offer: http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 3&t=187869hiima3L wrote:Cal. Ct. App. doesn't hire clerks
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
I think you can still call it a "clerkship" as used in the vernacular since it's a term appointment for a specific judge. I pointed to your thread because I, like hiima3L, understood that California courts generally did not hire term clerks -- only permanent staff attorneys. Just curious, how common do you think it is for CA appellate judges to hire term clerks?augusta1985 wrote:OP here. Should have clarified...The position is for a staff attorney, but working for a specific judge.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Are State Clerkships just a lottery?
My understanding is that it's extremely rare. The California Courts are essentially using their "staff attorneys" and "habeas/capital attorneys" in lieu of clerks. Same goes for the state supreme court, for reasons I'm unsure of. One thing I might add is that the perks of the federal term clerks seem to be a lot better. If you choose to opt out of the "Leave Act", your vacation time is completely up to the judge you work for. So if you land a cool judge that isn't a taskmaster, they could theoretically give you an unlimited amount of vacation.ggocat wrote:I think you can still call it a "clerkship" as used in the vernacular since it's a term appointment for a specific judge. I pointed to your thread because I, like hiima3L, understood that California courts generally did not hire term clerks -- only permanent staff attorneys. Just curious, how common do you think it is for CA appellate judges to hire term clerks?augusta1985 wrote:OP here. Should have clarified...The position is for a staff attorney, but working for a specific judge.