Page 14 of 15

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:58 pm
by Anonymous User
i know that cooley gave out non-IP CBs.

has anyone heard back from cooley post-CB?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:17 am
by Anonymous User
Any news from:

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
Dorsey & Whitney
Watt Tieder Hoffar & Fitzgerald
Potter Anderson
Stradley Ronon (Philly)
Dechert (Philly)

?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:39 pm
by Anonymous User
Anyone hear anything from Brinks Hofer as of yet?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:40 pm
by Anonymous User
Goodwin Procter cb.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:09 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:Any news from:

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
Dorsey & Whitney
Watt Tieder Hoffar & Fitzgerald
Potter Anderson
Stradley Ronon (Philly)
Dechert (Philly)

?
Myself and one other person I know are both still waiing to hear from Nelson Mullins. You might be that other person afaik.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:55 pm
by Anonymous User
Still waiting to hear from Nelson Mullins as well.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:59 pm
by Anonymous User
Has anyone heard from Foley Lardner DC post OCI screener?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:19 pm
by Anonymous User
Weil DC ding today by snailmail.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:46 pm
by Anonymous User
Anyone here form any gov't screeners?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:34 pm
by Anonymous User
Don't go to school at GW, but Government Accountability Office - OGC, made their offers.

EPA will be a few weeks.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:46 am
by Anonymous User
Any life with 500+ firms in transaction or general lit (non-IP. If you're IP and got a CB, you don't count...)

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:29 pm
by Anonymous User
Paul Hastings NYC offer today via phone. Fist Pump.

Let me clarify. Cartwheel somersault fist pump high-five.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:53 pm
by Anonymous User
Nelson Mullins ding via snail mail. At least that's some news though as opposed to silence.

Just found out something interesting: large firms who haven't sent you a callback or rejection after your screening interview haven't forgotten about you. They put people "on hold." This means that they do one round of callbacks and offers, then another to fill any voids after they see how many spots they have left. So don't get discouraged just yet.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:03 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:Nelson Mullins ding via snail mail. At least that's some news though as opposed to silence.

Just found out something interesting: large firms who haven't sent you a callback or rejection after your screening interview haven't forgotten about you. They put people "on hold." This means that they do one round of callbacks and offers, then another to fill any voids after they see how many spots they have left. So don't get discouraged just yet.
"on hold"? know anything more about that? i'm still waiting on some i had screeners at. i figured it had been so long that it was just a rejection

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:21 pm
by Anonymous User
A recruiter told me thereason I hadn't heard anything was because they have two outstanding offers and only two openings in their summer clasd

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:42 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Nelson Mullins ding via snail mail. At least that's some news though as opposed to silence.

Just found out something interesting: large firms who haven't sent you a callback or rejection after your screening interview haven't forgotten about you. They put people "on hold." This means that they do one round of callbacks and offers, then another to fill any voids after they see how many spots they have left. So don't get discouraged just yet.
"on hold"? know anything more about that? i'm still waiting on some i had screeners at. i figured it had been so long that it was just a rejection
I don't want to say the person's name or firm who told me, but he was on the hiring committee at a large firm that participated in OCI and that I hadn't applied to. I was asking him questions about interviews in general and mentioned that I hadn't heard from one screener, but I knew they had already had callbacks and offers, so it was probably a no.

He said that at his firm, they first extend a round of callbacks and a round of rejections. The people in the middle are put on hold. If they fill all of the available spots with the first round of callbacks and offers, then there is no need to keep the people on hold, so more rejections go out. However, if a few people reject their offers, they will need to do another round of callbacks.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:12 am
by Anonymous User
Thompson Coburn or Shulman Rogers??

I just got a CB from a midsized firm, so there is still hope....

Any mass mailing news? Or resume drop?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:29 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Nelson Mullins ding via snail mail. At least that's some news though as opposed to silence.

Just found out something interesting: large firms who haven't sent you a callback or rejection after your screening interview haven't forgotten about you. They put people "on hold." This means that they do one round of callbacks and offers, then another to fill any voids after they see how many spots they have left. So don't get discouraged just yet.
"on hold"? know anything more about that? i'm still waiting on some i had screeners at. i figured it had been so long that it was just a rejection
I don't want to say the person's name or firm who told me, but he was on the hiring committee at a large firm that participated in OCI and that I hadn't applied to. I was asking him questions about interviews in general and mentioned that I hadn't heard from one screener, but I knew they had already had callbacks and offers, so it was probably a no.

He said that at his firm, they first extend a round of callbacks and a round of rejections. The people in the middle are put on hold. If they fill all of the available spots with the first round of callbacks and offers, then there is no need to keep the people on hold, so more rejections go out. However, if a few people reject their offers, they will need to do another round of callbacks.
haha well here's to hoping people get better offers and reject the firm i'm waiting on ASAP

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:31 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:i know that cooley gave out non-IP CBs.

has anyone heard back from cooley post-CB?
Any updates on Cooley?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:02 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:Thompson Coburn or Shulman Rogers??

I just got a CB from a midsized firm, so there is still hope....

Any mass mailing news? Or resume drop?

Shulman Rogers has started doing their CBs. I had mine over a week ago, and apparently I was one of the earlier CBs. Dunno if that's good or bad or what.

They said they're going to to continue CBs for a few weeks, and I wouldn't hear either way until closer to the end of the month.

GL!

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:33 pm
by Anonymous User
So you think I may still hear form them?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:47 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:So you think I may still hear form them?
Maybe. FWIW, I received my CB invitation a week before the actual CB.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:58 pm
by Anonymous User
Anyone have any word on resume collect firms?

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:35 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:Anyone have any word on resume collect firms?
Got one rejection and one CB.

Re: GW OCI 2012

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:41 am
by Anonymous User
One callback from resume collect. That's about it.